Computer-aided navigation for correction of glenoid deformity in total shoulder arthroplasty

Techniques in Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 23-28

  Stanley, Rodney J ^a   Edwards, T Bradley ^b   Sarin, Vineet K ^c   Gartsman, Gary M ^b  

^a Northshore Orthopedic and Sports Medicine Center   (United States)

^b Fondren Orthopedic Group   (United States)

^c Kinamed Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer aided; Computer assisted; Glenoid deformity; Glenoid morphology; Navigation; Total shoulder arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; HUMERUS; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; SHOULDER; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT CONTRAINDICATION; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 33847159978     PISSN: 15239896     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BTE.0b013e31802ca571     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Digioia AM III, Jaramaz B, Plakseychuk AY, et al. Comparison of a mechanical acetabular alignment guide with computer placement of the socket. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:359-364.
2. Haaker RG, Stockheim M, Kamp M, et al. Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;433:152.
3. Hopkins AR, Hansen UN, Amis AA, et al. The effects of glenoid component alignment variations on cement mantle stresses in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004;13:668.
4. Neer C. Shoulder Reconstruction. New York, NY: WB Saunders Co, 1990.
5. Levine WN, Djurasovic M, Glasson JM, et al. Hemiarthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis: results correlated to degree of glenoid wear. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1997;6:449-454.
6. Edwards TB, Stanley RJ, Walch G. Influence of glenoid morphology on the results of total shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis. Should Arthroplasty. In press.
7. Farron A, Terrier A, Buchler P. Risks of loosening of a prosthetic glenoid implanted in retroversion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;15:521-526.
8. Walch G, Boulahia A, Boileau P, et al. Primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: clinical and radiographic classification. Acta Orthop Belg. 1998;64(suppl 2):46-52.
9. Walch G, Badet R, Boulahia A, et al. Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:756-760.
10. Friedman RJ, Hawthorne KB, Genez BM. The use of computerized tomography in the measurement of glenoid version. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:1032-1037.
11. Hurley JA, Anderson JE, Dear W, et al. Posterior shoulder instability: surgical versus conservative results with evaluation of glenoid version. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20:396-400.
12. Randelli M, Gambriolo PL. Glenohumeral osteometry by computed tomography in normal and unstable shoulders. Clin Orthop. 1986;208:151-156.
13. Welsch G, Mamisch TC, Kikinis R, et al. CT-based preoperative analysis of scapula morphology and glenohumeral joint geometry. Comput Aided Surg. 2003;8:264-268.
14. Sarin VK, Pilgeram KC, Gartsman GM, et al. Computer assisted total shoulder arthroplasty - a cadaver study. Poster presented at the Annual Symposium of the International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty; September 30, 2005; Kyoto, Japan.