What stands and develops between creative and critical thinking?. Argumentation?

Thinking Skills and Creativity

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 10-18

  Glassner, Amnon ^a   Schwarz, Baruch B ^b  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

^b HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Creative thinking; Critical reasoning

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847150057     PISSN: 18711871     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2006.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Belenky M.F. Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice and mind (1986), Basic Books, New York
2. Berg C.A. Knowledge of strategies for dealing with everyday problems from childhood to adolescence. Developmental Psychology 25 (1989) 607-618
3. Ennis R.H. Critical thinking: A streamlined conception. Teaching Philosophy 14 1 (1991) 5-25
4. Ennis R.H. Critical thinking (1996), Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice-Hall
5. Facione P.A., and Facione N.C. The California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CCTDI). Test administration manual (1992), California Academic Press, Millbrae, CA
6. Glassner A., and Schwarz B.B. The antilogos ability to evaluate information supporting moral arguments. Learning and Instruction 15 (2005) 353-375
7. Harris, R. (1998). Introduction to creative thinking. In www.virtualsalt.com.
8. Jacobs J.E., and Klaczynski P. The development of judgment and decision making during childhood and adolescence. Current Directions in Psychological Science 13 4 (2002) 145-149
9. In: Kahneman D., Slovic P., and Tversky A. (Eds). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (1980), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA
10. Klaczynski P.A. Bias in adolescents' everyday reasoning and its relationship with intellectual ability, personal theories, and self-serving motivation. Developmental Psychology 33 (1997) 273-283
11. Klaczynski P.A. Motivated scientific biases, epistemological beliefs, and theory polarization: A two-process approach to adolescent cognition. Developmental Psychology 33 (2000) 273-283
12. Kokis J.V., Macpherson R., Toplak M.E., West R.F., and Stanovich K.E. Heuristic and analytic processing: Age trends and associations with cognitive abilities and cognitive styles. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 83 (2002) 26-52
13. Kuhn D. The skills of argument (1991), Cambridge University Press, New York
14. Kuhn D. How do people know?. Psychological Science 12 1 (2001) 1-8
15. Lord C.G., Ross L., and Lepper M.R. Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effect of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 11 (1979) 2098-2109
16. Nisbett R., and Ross L. Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment (1980), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
17. Paul R. Dialogical thinking: Critical thought essential to the acquisition of rational knowledge and passions. In: Baron J., and Stenberg R. (Eds). Teaching thinking skills-Theory and practice (1987), W.H. Freeman and Company
18. Paul R. Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world (1990), Santa Rosa, CA, Foundation for Critical Thinking
19. Perkins D.N. The nature and nurture of creativity. In: Jones B.F., and Idol L. (Eds). Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (1990), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
20. Schwarz B.B., and Glassner A. The blind and the paralytic: Supporting argumentation in everyday and scientific issues. In: Andriessen J., Baker M., and Suthers D. (Eds). Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (2003), Kluwer Academic Publishers 227-260
21. Siegel H. Educating reason (1988), Routledge, New York
22. Stanovich K. Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning (1999), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
23. Stein N.L., and Miller C.A. A theory of argumentative understanding: Relationships among position preference, judgments of goodness, memory and reasoning. Argumentation 7 2 (1993) 183-204
24. Toplak M.E., and Stanovich K.E. The domain specificity and generality of disjunctive reasoning: Searching for a generalizable critical thinking skill. Journal of Educational Psychology 94 1 (2002) 197-209
25. Torrance E.P. The Torrance test of creative thinking (1966), Scholastic Testing Service, Bensenville, IL
26. Voss J.F., and Van Dyke J.A. Argumentation in psychology: Background comments. Discourse Processes 32 2-3 (2001) 89-111
27. Walters K.S. Critical thinking, rationality, and the vulcanization of students. Journal of Higher Education 61 4 (1990) 448-467