Teaching students observational methods: Visual studies and visual analysis

Visual Studies

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 29-35

  Ten Have, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847137036     PISSN: 1472586X     EISSN: 14725878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1472586032000100047     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Atkinson, Paul and David Silverman. 1997. “Kundera’s Immortality: the interview society and the invention of the self,” Qualitative Inquiry 3:304–325.
2. Ball, Michael S. and Gregory W. H. Smith. 1992. Analyzing Visual Data. Qualitative Research Methods Series 24. Newbury Park: Sage.
3. Ball, Mike and Greg Smith. 2001. “Technologies of realism? Ethnographic uses of photography and film,” in Paul Atkinson, Amanda Coffey, Sara Delamont, John Lofland and Lyn H. Lofland, eds. Handbook of Ethnography. London: Sage.
4. Coulter, Jeff. 1979. The Social Construction of Mind: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Linguistic Philosophy. London: Macmillan.
5. Coulter, Jeff. 1989. Mind in Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.
6. Emmison, Mike and P. Smith. 2000. Researching the Visual: Images, Objects, Contexts and Interactions in Social and Cultural Inquiry. London: Sage.
7. Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
8. Garfinkel, Harold and Harvey Sacks. 1970. “On formal structures of practical action,” in John C. McKinney and Edward A. Tiryakian, eds. Theoretical Sociology: Perspectives and Developments. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 338–366.
9. Goffman, Erving. 1963. Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: Free Press.
10. Goffman, Erving. 1972. Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
11. Have, Paul ten. 1990. “Methodological issues in conversation analysis,” Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 27(June):23–51.
12. Have, Paul ten. 2002, September. “The notion of member is the heart of the matter: on the role of membership knowledge in ethnomethodological inquiry” [53 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research [on-line journal], 3(3). Available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/fqs-eng.htm.
13. Have, Paul ten. Understanding Qualitative Research and Ethnomethodology. London: Sage (forthcoming).
14. Heath, Christian. 1986. Body Movement and Speech in Medical Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Have, Paul ten. 1997. “The analysis of activities in face to face interaction using video,” in D. Silverman, ed. Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice. London: Sage, 183–200.
16. Heath, Christian and Paul Luff. 2000. Technology in Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Livingston, Eric. 1987. Making Sense of Ethnomethodology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
18. Lynch, Michael. 1993. Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Ryave, A. Lincoln and James N. Schenkein. 1974. “Notes on the art of walking,” in Roy Turner (ed.) Ethnomethodology: Selected Readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 265–274.
20. Silverman, David. 1993. Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. London: Sage.
21. Silverman, David. 2001. Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction, 2nd edn. London: Sage.
22. Zimmerman, Don H. and Melvin Pollner. 1971. “The everyday world as a phenomenon,” in J. D. Douglas, ed. Understanding Everyday Life: Towards a Reconstruction of Sociological Knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 80–103.