Does stress reactivity or response to amphetamine predict smoking progression in young adults? A preliminary study

Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Volumn 86, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 312-319

  de Wit, Harriet ^a   Vicini, Lisa ^a   Childs, Emma ^a   Sayla, Maliha A ^a   Terner, Jolan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Acute stress; Cortisol; d Amphetamine; Human; Individual differences; Progression; Smoking; Subjective effects

Indexed keywords

AMPHETAMINE; DOPAMINE RECEPTOR STIMULATING AGENT; HYDROCORTISONE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COLLEGE STUDENT; DRUG SELF ADMINISTRATION; DRUG USE; EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART RATE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOOD; NORMAL HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SALIVA LEVEL; SMOKING; STRESS; TRIER SOCIAL STRESS TEST;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BLOOD PRESSURE; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM STIMULANTS; DEXTROAMPHETAMINE; DISEASE PROGRESSION; DOPAMINE; DOPAMINE UPTAKE INHIBITORS; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; EUPHORIA; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; HYDROCORTISONE; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SALIVA; SMOKING; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

ANIMALIA; RODENTIA;

EID: 33847128875     PISSN: 00913057     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2006.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aaron D.J., Dearwater S.R., Anderson R., Olsen T., Krista A.M., and Laporte R.E. Physical activity and the initiation of high-risk health behaviors in adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc 27 (1995) 1639-1645
2. Al'absi M. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical responses to psychological stress and risk for smoking relapse. Int J Psychophysiol 59 (2006) 218-227
3. Alessi S.M., Greenwald M., and Johanson C.E. The prediction of individual differences in response to d-amphetamine in healthy adults. Behav Pharmacol 14 1 (2003) 19-32
4. APA. American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Psychiatry. 4th ed. 1994;APA, APA.
5. Cohen S., and Hamrick N. Stable individual differences in physiological response to stressors: implications for stress-elicited changes in immune related health. Brain Behav Immun 17 6 (2003) 407-414 [Review]
6. Depue R.A., and Collins P.F. Neurobiology of the structure of personality: dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion. Behav Brain Sci 22 3 (1999) 491-517 [discussion 518-69. Rev.]
7. Depue R.A., Luciana M., Arbisi P., Collins P., and Leon A. Dopamine and the structure of personality: relation of agonist-induced dopamine activity to positive emotionality. J Pers Soc Psychol 67 3 (1994) 485-498
8. Deroche V., Piazza P.V., Le Moal M., and Simon H. Individual differences in the psychomotor effects of morphine are predicted by reactivity to novelty and influenced by corticosterone secretion. Brain Res 623 2 (1993) 341-344
9. Escobedo L.G., Marcus S.E., Holtzman D., and Giovino G.A. Sports participation, age at smoking initiation, and the risk of smoking among U.S. high school students. JAMA 269 (1993) 1391-1395
10. Flay B.R., Hu F.B., and Richardson J. Psychosocial predictors of different stages of cigarette smoking among high school students. Prev Med 27 (1998) A9-A18
11. Johanson C.E., and Uhlenhuth E.H. Drug preference and mood in humans: d-amphetamine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 71 (1980) 275-279
12. Kabbaj M. Neurobiological bases of individual differences in emotional and stress responsiveness: high responders-low responders model. Arch Neurol 61 (2004) 1009-1012
13. Kelly TH, Robbins G, Martin CA, Fillmore MT, Lane SD, Harrington NG Rush CR. Individual differences in drug abuse vulnerability: d-amphetamine and sensation seeking status. Psychopharmacology, in press.
14. Kirschbaum C., Pirke K.M., and Hellhammer D.H. The 'Trier Social Stress Test'-a tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting. Neuropsychobiology 28 (1993) 76-81
15. Kirschbaum C., Scherer G., and Strasburger C.J. Pituitary and adrenal hormone responses to pharmacological, physical, and psychological stimulation in habitual smokers and nonsmokers. Clin Investig 72 (1994) 804-810
16. Marinelli M. The many facets of the locomotor response to a novel environment test: theoretical comment on Mitchell, Cunningham, and Mark (2005). Behav Neurosci 119 (2005) 1144-1151
17. Marinelli M., and Piazza P.V. Interaction between glucocorticoid hormones, stress and psychostimulant drugs. Eur J Neurosci 16 (2002) 387-394
18. Martin W.R., Sloan J.W., Sapira J.D., and Jasinski D.R. Physiologic, subjective and behavioral effects of amphetamine, methamphetamine, ephedrine, phenmetrazine and methylphenidate in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther 12 (1971) 245-258
19. McNair D., Lorr M., and Droppleman L. Profile of mood states (1971), Educational and Industrial Testing Service, San Diego
20. Mitchell J.M., Cunningham C.L., and Mark G.P. Locomotor activity predicts acquisition of self-administration behavior but not cocaine intake. Behav Neurosci 119 (2005) 464-472
21. Orlando M., Ellickson P.L., and Jinnett K. The temporal relationship between emotional distress and cigarette smoking during adolescence and young adulthood. J Consult Clin Psychol 69 (2001) 959-970
22. Perkins K.A., Grobe J.E., Fonte C., and Breus M. "Paradoxical" effects of smoking on subjective stress versus cardiovascular arousal in males and females. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 42 (1992) 301-311
23. Piazza P.V., and Le Moal M.L. Pathophysiological basis of vulnerability to drug abuse: role of an interaction between stress, glucocorticoids, and dopaminergic neurons. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 36 (1996) 359-378
24. Piazza P.V., Deminiere J.M., Le Moal M., and Simon H. Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Science 245 (1989) 1511-1513
25. Piazza P.V., Maccari S., Deminiere J.M., Le Moal M., Mormede P., and Simon H. Corticosterone levels determine individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88 (1991) 2088-2092
26. Resnick M.D., Bearman P.S., Blum R.W., Bauman K.E., Harris K.M., Jones J., et al. Protecting adolescents from harm. Findings from the National Longitudinal Study on Adolescent Health. JAMA 278 (1997) 823-832
27. Rohleder N., Wolf J.M., and Kirschbaum C. Glucocorticoid sensitivity in humans-interindividual differences and acute stress effects. Stress 6 (2003) 207-222 [Review]
28. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2004 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings (Office of Applied Studies, NSDUH Series H-28, DHHS Publication No. SMA 05-4062). 2005; Rockville, MD.
29. Suto N., Austin J.D., and Vezina P. Locomotor response to novelty predicts a rat's propensity to self-administer nicotine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 158 (2001) 175-180
30. Webster R.A., Hunter M., and Keats J.A. Personality and sociodemographic influences on adolescents' substance use: A path analysis. Int J Addict 29 (1994) 941-956
31. White T.L., Lott D., and de Wit H. Personality and the subjective effects of acute amphetamine in healthy volunteers. Neuropsychopharmacology 31 (2006) 1064-1074