SOA does not reveal the absolute time course of cognitive processing in fast priming experiments

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 321-335

  Tzur, Boaz ^a   Frost, Ram ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

Luminance; Masked priming; Phonological computation; SOA; Visual word recognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847122928     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Berent I., and Perfetti C.A. Roses are reezes: the two cycles of phonological assembly in English. Psychological Review 102 (1995) 146-184
2. Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2001). The time-course of morphological, phonological and semantic processes in reading Modern Standard Arabic. Proceedings of the Twenty Third Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society Edinburgh, Scotland, pp. 138-143.
3. Brysbaert M. Prelexical phonological coding of visual words in Dutch: automatic after all. Memory & Cognition 29 (2001) 765-773
4. Coltheart M., Rastle K., Perry C., Langdon R., and Zeigler J. A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review 108 (2001) 204-256
5. Di Lollo V., von Muhlenen A., Enns J.T., and Bridgeman B. Decoupling stimulus duration from brightness in metacontrast masking: data and models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 30 (2004) 733-745
6. Dominguez A., Segui J., and Cuetos F. The time course of inflexional morphological priming. Linguistics 40 (2002) 235-259
7. Ferrand L., and Grainger J. Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: evidence from masked nonword priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 45A (1992) 353-372
8. Ferrand L., and Grainger J. The time course of orthographic and phonological code activation in early phases of visual word recognition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 31 (1993) 119-122
9. Ferrand L., and Grainger J. Effects of orthography are independent of phonology in masked form priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 47A (1994) 365-382
10. Forster K.I. Form-priming with masked primes: the best-match hypothesis. In: Coltheart M. (Ed). Attention & performance XII (1987), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 127-146
11. Forster K.I. The pros and cons of masked priming. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 27 (1998) 203-233
12. Forster K.I., and Davis C. Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 10 (1984) 680-698
13. Frost R. Phonological computation and missing vowels: mapping lexical involvement in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21 (1995) 398-408
14. Frost R. Towards a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: true issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin 123 (1998) 71-99
15. Frost R., Ahissar M., Gottesman R., and Tayeb S. Are phonological effects fragile? The effect of luminance and exposure duration on form priming and phonological Priming. Journal of Memory and Language 48 (2003) 346-358
16. Frost R., Forster K.I., and Deutsch A. What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew: a masked priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23 (1997) 829-856
17. Grainger J., and Ferrand L. Masked orthographic and phonological priming in visual word recognition and naming: cross-task comparisons. Journal of Memory and Language 35 (1996) 623-647
18. Hadani I., Meiri A.Z., and Guri M. The effect of exposure duration and luminance on the 3-dot hyperacuity task. Vision Research 24 (1984) 871-874
19. Hood D.C., and Finkelstein M.A. Sensitivity to light. In: Boff K., Kaufman L., and Thomas J. (Eds). Handbook of perception and human performance Vol. 1 (1986), Wiley-Interscience, New York 5.1-5.6
20. Jacobs A.M., Grainger J., and Ferrand L. The incremental priming technique: a method for determining within-condition priming effects. Perception & Psychophysics 57 (1995) 1101-1110
21. Lukatela G., Frost S., and Turvey M.T. Phonological priming by masked nonword primes in the lexical decision task. Journal of memory and Language 39 (1998) 666-683
22. Lukatela G., and Turvey M.T. Visual access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 123 (1994) 107-128
23. Lukatela G., and Turvey M.T. Visual access is initially phonological: 2. Evidence from associative priming by homophones and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 123 (1994) 331-353
24. Michaels C.F., and Turvey M.T. Central sources of visual masking: Indexing structures supporting seeing at a single brief glance. Psychological Research 41 (1979) 1-61
25. Perfetti C.A., Bell L.C., and Delaney S.M. Automatic (prelexical) phonetic activation in silent word reading: evidence from backward masking. Journal of Memory and Language 27 (1988) 59-70
26. Rastle K., and Brysbaert M. Masked phonological priming effects in English: are they real? Do they matter?. Cognitive Psychology 53 (2006) 97-145
27. Sperling G. Information retrieval from two rapidly consecutive stimuli: a new analysis. Perception & Psychophysics 9 (1971) 89-91
28. Tan L.H., and Perfetti C.A. Phonological and associative inhibition in the early stages of English word identification: evidence from backward masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 59-69
29. Turvey M.T. On peripheral and central processes in vision: inferences from an information-processing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli. Psychological Review 80 (1973) 1-52
30. Van Orden G.C., Pennington B.F., and Stone G.O. Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review 97 (1990) 488-522
31. Verstaen A., Humphreys G.W., Olson A., and d'Ydewalle G. Are phonemic effects in backward masking evidence for automatic prelexical phonemic activation in visual word recognition?. Journal of Memory and Language 34 (1995) 335-356