New applications for information fusion and soil moisture forecasting

2005 7th International Conference on Information Fusion, FUSION

Volumn 2, Issue , 2005, Pages 1622-1628

  Khalil, Abedalrazq ^a   Kashif Gill, M ^a   McKee, Mac ^a  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FORECASTING; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MOISTURE; SOILS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

BAYESIAN LEARNING; DATA FUSION; RELEVANCE VECTOR MACHINE (RVM); SOIL MOISTURE; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE (SVM);

INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

EID: 33847118178     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICIF.2005.1592050     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Allen, P.B., and J. W. Nancy, 1991. Hydrology of the Little Washita River Watershed, Oklahoma: Data and analyses. ARS-90, USDA-ARS-NAWQL, Durant, OK.
2. ASCE Task Committee on Application of the Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology, 2000. Artificial neural networks in hydrology II: Hydrologic applications. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE, 5(2):124-137.
3. Asefa, T., M. W. Kemblowski, G. Urroz, M. McKee, and A. Khalil, 2004. Support vectors-based groundwater head observation networks design. Water Resources Research, 40 (11): W11509, 0.1029/2004WR003304.
4. Baghdadi, N., S. Gaultier, and C. King, 2002. Retrieving surface roughness and soil moisture from synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data using neural networks. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 28, 5, pp. 701-711.
5. Berger, J. O., 1985. Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis. 2nd Ed., Springer, New York.
6. David, R. L., and M. J. Gregory, 1999. Evaluating the use of "goodness-of-fit" measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resources Research, 35 (1), 233-241.
7. Jackson, T. J., 1997. Southern Great Plains 1997 (SGP97) Hydrology Experiment Plan, Available at http://hydrolab.arsusda.gov/~tjackson, access data (January 15, 2005).
8. Kecman, V., 2001. Learning and Soft Computing: Support Vector Machines, Neural Networks, and Fuzzy Logic Models. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
9. Khalil, A. F., Almasri, M. N., McKee, M., Kaluarachchi, J. J., 2005. Applicability of statistical learning algorithms in groundwater quality modeling. Water Resources Research, 41 (5), W05010, doi:10.1029/2004WR003608..
10. Kunstmann, H., W. Kinzelbach, and T. Siegfried, 2002. Conditional first-order second moment method and its application to the quantification of uncertainty in groundwater modeling. Water Resources Research, 38(4): 1035.
11. Li, Y., C. Campbell, and M. Tipping, 2002. Bayesian automatic relevance determination algorithms for classifying gene expression data. Bioinformatics, 18 (10), 1332-1339.
12. Liong, S. and C. Sivapragasam, 2002. Flood stage forecasting with support vector machines. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 38(1):173-186.
13. MacKay, D. J., 1992. Bayesian interpolation. Neural Computation, 4 (3), 415-447.
14. MacKay, D., 2003. Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms. Cambridge University Press.
15. Mather, J. K., 1974. Climatology Fundamentals and Applications. McGraw-Hill, New York, 151-153.
16. Mukherjee, S., E. Osuna, and F. Girosi, 1997. Nonlinear prediction of chaotic time series using support vector machines. Proceedings of IEEE Workshops on Neural Network for Signal Processing, Amelia Island, FL.
17. Schmugge, T. J., P.E. O'Neill, and J. R. Wang, 1986. Passive microwave soil moisture research. IEEE Transaction on Geosciences and Remote Sensing, 24, pp. 12-22.
18. Schölkopf, B. and A. J. Smola, 2002. Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
19. Tipping, M., 2000. The relevance vector machine. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 12, edited by S. Solla, T. Leen, and K.-R. Muller, pp. 652-658, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
20. Tipping, M.E., 2001. Sparse Bayesian learning and the relevance vector machine. Journal of Machine Learning, 1:211-244.
21. Vapnik, V., 1995. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer, New York.
22. Vapnik, V., 1998. Statistical Learning Theory. Wiley, New York.
23. Wahba, G., 1985. A comparison of GCV and GML for choosing the smoothing parameter in the generalized spline-smoothing problem. The Annals of Statistics, 4:1378-1402.
24. Willmott, C. J., 1984. On the evaluation of model performance in physical geography. In G. L. Gaile and C. J. Willmott (Eds.), Spatial Statistics and Models, pp. 443-460 Dordrecht, Holland.
25. Yu, X.Y., 2004. Support vector machine in chaotic hydrological time series forecasting. PhD Dissertation, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
26. Yu, X.Y, S.Y. Liong, and V. Babovic, 2004. EC-SVM approach for real time hydrologic forecasting. Journal of Hydroinformatics 6:209-223.