Fast approximate EM induction modeling of metallic and UXO targets using a permeable prism

Journal of Applied Geophysics

Volumn 61, Issue 3-4, 2007, Pages 235-242

  Asten, Michael W ^a   Duncan, Andrew C ^b  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b Electromagnetic Imaging Technology Pty Ltd   (Australia)

Author keywords

Electromagnetic model; EM; Magnetic permeability; UXO

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; GEOMETRY; MAGNETIC PERMEABILITY; MAGNETIC PROPERTIES;

ELECTROMAGNETIC MODEL; INDUCTION MODELING;

GEOPHYSICS;

ALGORITHM; ELECTROMAGNETIC METHOD; MAGNETIC PROPERTY; MODELING; PERMEABILITY;

EID: 33847112388     PISSN: 09269851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2006.05.010     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Barnett C.T. Simple inversion of time domain electromagnetic data. Geophysics 49 (1984) 925-933
2. Bell T., Barrow B., Miller J., and Keiswetter D. Time and frequency domain electromagnetic induction signatures of unexploded ordnance. Subsurface Sensing Technologies and Applications 2 3 (2001) 153-175
3. Brown W.F. Magnetostatic Principles in Ferromagnetism (1962), North Holland, Amsterdam
4. Duncan A.C. Interpretation of down-hole transient EM data using current filaments. Exploration Geophysics 18 (1987) 36-38
5. EMIT. Maxwell 4.0: Modeling, Presentation and Visualization of EM and Electrical Geophysical Data (2005). http://www.emit.iinet.net.au/Maxwell_brochure.PDF. http://www.emit.iinet.net.au/Maxwell_brochure.PDF.
6. Gasperikova E. EM sensors for detection and classification of buried metallic objects. Paper Presented at Partners in Environmental Technology Technical Symposium and Workshop, Washington DC, Dec 2-4, Technical Session B (2003)
7. Grimm R.E. Triaxial modelling and target classification of multichannel multicomponent EM data for UXO discrimination. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics 8 4 (2003) 239-250
8. Jupp D.L.B., and Vozoff K. Stable iterative methods for geophysical inversion. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 42 (1975) 957-976
9. Lamontagne Y. Multiloop II: EM Modelling on the Macintosh (2004). http://geophysics.kos.net/brochures/MultiLoopII_sm.pdf. http://geophysics.kos.net/brochures/MultiLoopII_sm.pdf.
10. Lamontagne Y., Macnae J., and Polzer B. Multiple conductor modelling using program Multiloop. 58th Ann. Mtg. of Soc. Exploration Geophysics, Expanded Abstracts (1998)
11. Osborne J.A. Demagnetizing factors of the general ellipsoid. Physics Review 67 11 (1945) 351-357
12. Pasion, L.R., 1999. Detecting Unexploded Ordnance with Time Domain Electromagnetic Induction. M.Sc. Thesis, University of British Columbia.
13. Pasion L.R., and Oldenburg D.W. A discrimination algorithm for UXO using time domain electromagnetics. Journal of Engineering and Environmental Geophysics 6 2 (2001) 91-102
14. Silvester P., and Omeragic D. Sensitivity of metal detectors to spheroidal targets. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 33 6 (1995) 1331-1335
15. Smith J.T., and Morrison H.F. Estimating equivalent dipole polarizabilities for the inductive response of isolated conductive bodies. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 42 6 (2004) 1208-1214
16. Smith J.T., and Morrison H.F. Approximating spheroid inductive responses using spheres. Geophysics 71 2 (2006) G21-G25
17. Smith J.T., Morrison H.F., and Becker A. Parametric forms and the inductive response of a permeable conducting sphere. Journal of Engineering and Environmental Geophysics 9 4 (2004) 213-216