Remediation of petroleum-contaminated sites through simulation of a DPVE-aided cleanup process: Part 2. Remediation design

Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 367-387

  Huang, Y F ^a   Huang, G H ^b,c   Xiao, H N ^d,e   Chakma, A ^f   Lin, Q G ^c   Xu, H ^b  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b NORTH CHINA ELECTRIC POWER UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF REGINA   (Canada)

^d SOUTH CHINA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

^f UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

DPVE aided; Groundwater pollution; Remediation design; Western Canada

Indexed keywords

AQUIFERS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTAMINATION; CRUDE PETROLEUM; GROUNDWATER POLLUTION; VACUUM;

REMEDIATION DESIGN; VACUUM EXTRACTION; WESTERN CANADA;

BIOREMEDIATION;

EID: 33847104617     PISSN: 15567036     EISSN: 15567230     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15567030600904460     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Brendon, D. 1995. REMTEC: Site remediation treatment technology database. Proceedings of 5th Annual Symposium on Groundwater and Soil Remediation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
2. Christ, J. A., Goltz, M. N., and Huang, J. 1999. Development and application of an analytical model to aid design and implementation of in situ remediation technologies. J. Contaminant Hydrol. 37:295-317.
3. Freeman, H. M., and Harris, E. F. 1995. Hazardous Waster Remediation: Innovative Treatment Technologies. Lancaster, PA: Technomic Publishing Co., Inc.
4. Huang, Y. F., Li, J. B., Huang, G. H., Chakma, A., and Qin, X. S. 2003. Integrated simulation-optimization approach for real-time dynamic modeling and process control of surfactant-enhanced remediation at petroleum-contaminated sites. Practice Periodical Hazardous, Toxic, Radioactive Waste Manag. 7:95-105.
5. Huang, Y. F., Huang, G. H., Chakma, A., Maqsood, I., Chen, B., Li, J. B., and Yang, Y. P. 2006. Remediation of petroleum-contaminated sites through simulation of a DPVE-aided cleanup process: Part 1. Model development. Energy Sources, Part A 29:347-365.
6. Johnson, R. L., Johnson, P. C., Amerson, I. L., Johnson, T. L., Bruce, C. L., Leeson, A., and Vogel, C. M. 2001. Diagnostic tools for integrated in situ air sparging pilot tests. Bioremed. J. 5:283-298.
7. Lamberti, A., and Nissi, E. 2005. A multivariate approach for the analysis of spatially correlated environmental data. J. Environ. Informatics 5:9-16.
8. Lenhard, R. J., and Parker, J. C. 1987. Measurement and prediction of saturation-pressure relationships in three-phase porous media systems. J. Contaminant Hydrol. 1:407-424.
9. Liu, L. 2005. Modeling for surfactant-enhanced groundwater remediation processes at DNAPLs-contaminated sites. J. Environ. Informatics 5:42-52.
10. Liu, L., Hao, R. X., and Cheng, S. Y. 2003. A possibilistic analysis approach for assessing environmental risks from drinking groundwater at petroleum-contaminated sites. J. Environ. Informatics 2:31-37.
11. Loncar, A. F., Weston, R. F., Engbert, E. G., and Wujcik, W. 1994. Remediation technologies screening matrix and reference guide. 2nd International Symposium and Exhibition on Environmental Contamination in Central and Eastern Europe, 493-494.
12. Maqsood, I., Huang, G. H., and Huang, Y. F. 2004. A groundwater monitoring design through site characterization, numerical simulation and statistical analysis: A North American case study. J. Environ. Informatics 3:1-23.
13. McGovern, T., Guerin, T. F., Horner, S., and Davey, B. 2002. Design, construction and operation of a funnel and gate in-situ permeable reactive barrier for remediation of petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater. Water, Air, Soil Pollution 136:11-31.
14. Medd, S., Teterault, M., and Biggar, K. 1993. R.M.C. site remediation screening guide. Environmental Engineering Conference V1:171-178.
15. Miller, C. T., Hill, L. E. H., and Moutier, M. 2000. Remediation of DNAPL-contaminated subsurface systems using density-motivated mobilization. Environ. Sci. Tech. 34:719-724.
16. Mylopoulos, Y. A., Theodosiou, N., and Mylopoulos, N. A. 1999. A stochastic optimization approach in the design of an aquifer remediation under hydrogeologic uncertainty. Water Res. Manag. 13:335-351.
17. Nyer, E. K. 1998. Groundwater and Soil Remediation: Practical and Strategies. Chelsea, MI: Ann Arbor Press.
18. Powell, D. M. 1994. Selecting innovative cleanup technologies: EPA resources. Chem. Eng. Prog. May:33-41.
19. Rizzo, D. M., and Dougherty, D. E. 1996. Design optimization for multiple management period groundwater remediation. Water Resources Res. 32:2549-2562.
20. Roy F. Weston, Inc., and University of Massachusetts. 1990. Remedial Technologies for Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Chelsea, MI: Lewis Publishers, Inc.
21. Sawyer, C. S., Ahlfeld, D. P., and King, A. J. 1995. Groundwater remediation design using a three-dimensional simulation model and mixed-integer programming. Water Resources Res. 31:1373-1385.
22. SERM (Saskatchewan Environment and Resource Management). 1999. Risk Based Corrective Actions for Petroleum Contaminated Sites, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada: Province of Saskatchewan.
23. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 1997. Analysis of selected enhancements for soil vapor extraction, EPA-542-R-97-007. Washington, DC: Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (5102G).
24. WTIC (Water Technology International Corporation). 1997. REMTEC: Site Remediation Treatment Technology Database. Burlinton, Ontario, Canada: Water Technology International Corporation.