Face in chinese, japanese, and u.s. american cultures

Journal of Asian Pacific Communication

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 261-297

  Yabuuchi, Akio ^a  

^a WAKAYAMA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

American; Chinese; Conformity; Face; Japanese; Prestige

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847092657     PISSN: 09576851     EISSN: 15699838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/japc.14.2.05yab     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Abe, K. (1995). Seken towa nanika (What is seken?). Tokyo: Kodansha.
2. Aida, Y. (1970). Nihonjin no ishiki kozo (The structure of Japanese mentality). Tokyo: Kodansha.
3. Benedict, R. (1946)Chrysanthemum and the sword. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
4. Bond, M.H. & Hwang, K. (1986). The social psychology of the Chinese people. In M.H. Bond (ed.). The psychology of the Chinese people. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press (China).
5. Brown, P. & Levinson, S.C. (1978). Universlas in language usage: Politeness phenomenon. In E. Goody (ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Brown, P. & Levinson, S.C. (1987). Politeness: Some universalsin language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Chang, H. & Holt R. (1994). A Chinese perspective on face as inter-relational concern. In S. Ting-Toomey (ed.). The challenge offacework (pp. 95-132).
8. Chomsky, N. (1968). Language and mind. NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.
9. Doi, T. (1971). “Amae” no kozo. (Structure of dependence). Tokyo: Kobundo.
10. Doi, T. (1973). The anatomy of dependence. Tokyo: Kodansha. (English trans. of Doi [1971] by J. Bester).
11. Edward, R., Henkin, L., & Nathan, A.J. (1986). Human rights in contemporary China. NY: Columbia University Press. (Japanese trans. by Y. Saito & I. Korogi. [1990]. Chugoku no jinken: Sono rekishi to shiso to genjitsu to. Tokyo: Yushindo.)
12. Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry. 18, 213-31.
13. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.
14. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face interaction. Garden City, NY: Doubleday
15. Anchor. Goffman [1955] is reprinted in this volume, pp.5-46). (Japanese trans. by Hirose & Yasue [1986] and Asano [2002]. Tokyo: Hosei University Press.)
16. Hamaguchi, E. (1977). “Nihon rashisa” no saihakken (Rediscovery of the “Japanese-ness”). Tokyo: Nihon Keizai Shimbunsha.
17. Hamaguchi, E. (1983). Kanjin-shugi no shakai Nihon (Japan, society of contextual men). Tokyo: Toyo Keizai.
18. Hamaguchi, E. (1998). Nihon kenkyu genron (Principles of Japanese studies). Tokyo: Yuhikaku.
19. Hanazawa, S. (2002). Chugokujin to kimochiyoku tsukiau hoho (How to get along well with Chinese people). Tokyo: Kodansha.
20. Ho, D. Y. (1976). On the concept of face. American Journal of Sociology, 81 (4), 867-84.
21. Ho, D.Y. (1994). Face dynamics: From conceptualization to measurement. In S. Ting-Toomey(ed.). The challenge offacework. (pp.269-305).
22. Hu, H.C. (1944). The Chinese concept of “FACE”. American Anthropologist, 46, 45-64.
23. Hu, W. & Grove, C. (1991). Encountering the Chinese: A guide for Americans (Second Edition). Yarmouth, Maine: Intercultural Press.
24. Ikegami, Y. (1981). “Suru” to “Naru” no gengogaku (Linguistics of “Do” and “Become”). Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.
25. Imada, T. & Sonoda, S. (eds) (1995). Ajia karano shiten (Viewpoints from Asia). Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
26. Inoue, T. (1977). Sekentei no kozo (The structure of sekentei). NHK.
27. Ishizawa, Y. (1998). Nihonjinron Nihonron no keihu. (Genealogy of studies on the Japanese and Japan). Tokyo: Maruzen.
28. Itasaka, G. (1971). Nihonjin no ronri kozo (The structure of Japanese logic). Tokyo: Kodansha.
29. Jiang, H. (2000). Chugokujin no mentsu (Face of the Chinese). Tokyo: Hamano Shoten.
30. Jiang, H. (2001). Chugokujin no mentsu 2. Tokyo: Hamano Shoten.
31. Kamishima, J. (1975). Nihonjin no hasso (The ways of thinking of the Japanese). Tokyo: Kodansha.
32. Kong, J. (1988). Chugokujin to tsukiau ho ho (How to get along with the Chinese). Tokyo: Gakuseisha.
33. Kong, J. (1992). Chugokujin kara mita nihonjin (The Japanese seen from the Chinese). Tokyo: Gakuseisha.
34. Kosaka, J. (ed.). (1994). Chugokugo daijiten (Comprehensive Chinese Dictionary). Tokyo: Kadokawa Shoten.
35. Kunihiro, M. (1979). Eigo shiko to nihongo shiko (English-oriented and Japanese- oriented). Tokyo: Asahi Evening News.
36. Kunihiro, T. (1982). Imiron no hoho (Methodology of semantics). Tokyo: Taishukan shoten.
37. Lin, Y.T. (1939). My country and my people. NY: The John Day Company.
38. Lu, Q. (2001). Konna chugokujin, konna nihonjin (Such Chinese, such Japanese). Nishino-miya: Kanseigakuin University Press. (Originally published in the Japanese language).
39. Matsumoto, M. (2000). Eigo wa kakutogi da: Musashi ga eigo ni chosen sureba (English is a martial art: If Musashi challenges English). Tokyo: Chikuma Shobo.
40. Matsumura, A. (ed.). (1998). Daijisen. Tokyo: Shogakkan.
41. Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42. Midooka, K. (1990). Characteristics of Japanese-style communication. Media, Culture, and Society, 12 (pp.477-89).
43. Miyanaga, K. (1991). The creative edge: Individualism in Japan. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
44. Mori, M. (1971). “Na” to “Haji” no bunka (The cultures of “name” and “shame”). Tokyo: Kodansha.
45. Morisaki, S. & Gudykunst, W. B. (1994). Face in Japan and the United States. In S. Ting-Toomey (ed.). The challenge offacework (pp.47-93).
46. Munakata, T. (ed.). (2000). Hataraku hitotachino sutoresu sabaibaru: ijime, risutora, sekuhara (Stress survival of working people: bullying, firing, and sexual harassment). Tokyo: Akashi Shoten.
47. Nakamura, O. (ed.). (1994). Nihon to chugoku, kokogachigau (Japan and China, Here are the differences). Tokyo: Tokuma Shoten.
48. Nakane, C. (1967). Tate shakai no ningen kankei. (Human relations in the vertical society). Tokyo: Kodansha.
49. Nakane, C. (1970). Japanese society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. (English trans. ofNakane [1967]).
50. Nakane, C. (1972). Tekio no joken (Conditions for adjustment). Tokyo: Kodansha.
51. Naotsuka, R. (1980). Obeijin ga chinmoku surutoki (When the westerners get lost for words). Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.
52. Niimura, I. (ed.). (1990). Kojien. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
53. Omura, R. (1953). Noson no sekentei (Sekentei of agricultural villages). Toyo bunka, 12.
54. Qiu, Y. (1996). Chugokujin to nihonjin (The Chinese and the Japanese). Tokyo: Chuokoron-sha.
55. Rice, J., Kaji, S., & Hama, N. (1999). Nihonjin no makkana honto (Stark truths of the Japanese). Tokyo: MacMillan Language House.
56. Sakaguchi, R. (1986). Ijime to hansabetsu no kyoiku (Education against bullying and discrimination). Tokyo: Akashi Shoten.
57. Sengoku, T & Ding, Q. (1992). Chugokujin no kachikan: Social values and life styles in China today. Tokyo: Simul Press.
58. Shang, Y. (ed.). (1992). Chunichi jiten (Chinese-Japanese dictionary). Tokyo: Shogakkan.
59. Smith, P.B. & Bond, M.H. (1999). Social psychology across cultures (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
60. Song, W. & Todo, Y. (eds) (1987). Nicchu jiten (Japanese-Chinese dictionary). Tokyo: Shogakkan.
61. Sonoda, S. (2001). Chugokujin no shinri to kodo (The psychology and behavior ofthe Chinese people). Tokyo: NHK.
62. Sueda, K. (1993). Chugokujin ga motsumentsu no gainen to nihonjin tono comyunikeshon (The concept of mien-tzu the Chinese have and their communication with the Japanese). Nenpo Shakaigaku Honshu, 6 (pp. 191-202).
63. Summers, D.(eds). (1995). Longman dictionary of contemporary English, 3rd edition. Essex, England: Longman.
64. Tajima, E. (2001). “Chugokujin” toyu ikikata: Kotoba ni miru nicchu bunka hikaku (The ways of living as Chinese: A comparison between Japanese and Chinese cultures reflected in the languages). Tokyo: Shueisha.
65. Ting-Toomey, S. (ed.). (1994). The challenge offacework. Albany: State University of New York Press.
66. Ting-Toomey, S., Gao, G., Trubisky, P., Yang, Z., Kim, H., Lin, S., & Nishida, T. (1991). Culture, face maintenance, and styles of handling interpersonal conflict: A study in Five cultures. International Journal of Conflict Management, 2 (4) (pp.275-96).
67. Tsai, H. Y. (1996). Concept of‘mein tzu’ (face). in East Asian societies: The case of Taiwanese and Japanese. In H. Grad, A. Blanco, and J. Georgas (eds), Key issues in cross-cultural psychology, Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.
68. Tsuchiya, H. (1998). Chugoku no jinken to ho: Rekishi, genzai, soshite tenbo (Human rights and laws in China: Past, present and future). Tokyo: Akashi Shoten.
69. Vygotsky, L.S. (1962). Thought and language. E. Hanfmann and G. Vakar (trans.) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
70. Watanabe, S. & Hiraizumi, W. (1978). Eigo kyoiku daironso (A heated debate on English education). Tokyo: Bungei shunju.
71. Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf, J.B. Carroll (ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
72. Wierzbicka, A. (1991). Japanese keywords and core cultural values. Language in Society, 20 (pp.333-85).
73. Wierzbicka, A. (1991). Cross-Cultural pragmatics: The semantics of human interactions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
74. Wolferen, K. (1994). Ningen o kohuku ni shinai nihon to yu shisutemu (Japan as a system which never makes people happy). Tokyo: Mainichi Shimbunsha. (Published originally in the form ofJapanese translation).
75. Yabuuchi, A. (2002). Politeness revisited: An examination of alternative systems to Brown and Levinson’s. JACETBulletin, 35 (pp.41-55).