Analysis of melody roots in Hungarian folk music using self-organizing maps with adaptively weighted dynamic time warping

Applied Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 35-55

  Juhász, Zoltán ^a  

^a RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR TECHNICAL PHYSICS AND MATERIALS SCIENCE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DATABASE SYSTEMS; FUNCTION EVALUATION;

DYNAMIC TIME WARPING; ETHNOMUSICOLOGY; HUNGARIAN FOLK MUSIC;

SELF ORGANIZING MAPS;

EID: 33847091739     PISSN: 08839514     EISSN: 10876545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08839510600940116     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bartók, B. 1924. The Hungarian Folk Song. Budapest: Rózsavölgyi és Társa.
2. Bartók, B. and Z. Kodály. 1951-1997. Corpus Musicae Popularis Hungaricae l-X, Budapest: Academiai Kiado, Balassi Kiado.
3. Bod, R. 2001a, Memory-based models of melodic analysis: Challenging the Gestalt principles. Journal of New Music Research 31:27-37
4. Bod, R. 2001b. Probabilistic grammars for music. In Proceedings of the BNAJC 2001, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
5. De Poli, G. and P. Prandoni. 1996. Sonological models for timbre characterisation. Journal of New Music Research 26(2):170-197.
6. Dobszay, L. and J. Szendrei. 1992. Catalogue of Hungarian Folksong Types. Budapest: Akadémia.
7. Járdányi, P. 1974. Experiences and results in systematizing hungarian folksongs. In: Studia Musicologica XXII, 17-20. Budapest: Academiai: Kiado.
8. Jarvinen, T., P. Toiviainen, and J. Louhivuori. 1999. Classification and Categorisation of Musical Styles with Statistical Analysis and Self-Organising Maps. In Proceedings of the AISB Symposium on Musical Creativity, Edinburgh: The Society For the study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behavior, p. 54-57.
9. Juhász, Z. 2000. A model of variation in the music of a Hungarian ethnic group. Journal of New Music Research 29(2):159-172.
10. Juhász, Z. 2002. The structure of an oral tradition: Mapping of Hungarian folk music to a metric space. Journal of New Music Research 31(1) :295-310.
11. Juhász, Z. 2004. Segmentation of Hungarian folk songs using an entropy-based learning system. Journal of New Music Research 33(1):5-15.
12. Keogh, E. and M. Pazzani. 2001. Dynamic time warping with higher order features. In Proceedings of the SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, Chicago, IL, USA.
13. Kohonen, T. 1995. Self-Organising Maps. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
14. Krumhansl, C. L., Y. Louhivouri, P. Toiviainen, T. Jarvinen, and T. Ecrola. 1999. Melodic expectation in Finnish spiritual hymns: Convergence of statistical, behaviora, and computational approaches. Musk Perception 17(2):151-195.
15. Krumhansl, C. L., P. Toivanen, T. Eerola, P. Toiviainen, T. Jarvinen, and Y. Louhivouri. 2000. Cross-cultural music cognition: Cognitive methodology applied to North Sami yoiks. Cognition 76:13-58.
16. Leman, M. 2000. An auditory model of the role of short-term memory in probe-tone ratings. Music Perception 17(4):481-509.
17. Lord, A. 1960. The Singer of Tales. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Studies in Comparative Literature.
18. Myers, C. S. and L. R. Rabiner. 1981. A comparative study of several dynamic time-warping algorithms for connected word recognition. The Bell System Technical Journal 60(7):1389-1409.
19. Nettl, B. 1983. The Study of Ethnomusicology. Twenty-Nine Issues and Concepts. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
20. Sachira, D. and R. Milan. 1997. Dynamic programming approach to time normalized similarity evaluation of melodical structures. In Proceedings of the Meeting of the Study Group on Computer Aided Research in Musicology, pages 36-41, Dolná Krupá, Slovak Academy of Sciences.
21. Sandell, G. J. and W. L. Martens. 1997. Perceptual evaluation of principal component based synthesis of musical timbre. In Proceedings of the Meeting of the Study Group on Computer Aided Research in Musicology, Dolná Krupá, Slovakia.
22. Toiviainen, P. 1996. Optimizing auditory images and distance metrics for self-organizing timbre maps. Journal of New Music Research 25:1-30.
23. Toiviainen, P. 2000. Symbolic AI versus connectionism in music research. In: Readings in Music and Artificial Intelligence, ed. E. Mirinda, Amsterdam Holland: Harwood Academic Publishers.
24. Toiviainen, P. and T. Eerola. 2001. A method for comparative analysis of folk music based on musical feature extraction and neural networks. In Proceeding of the VII International Symposium on Systematic and Comparative Musicology III International Conference on Cognitive Musicology, pages 41-45, Jyvaskyla, Finland.
25. Toiviainen, P., M. Kaipainen, and J. Louhivuori. 1995. Musical timbre: Similarity ratings correlate with computational feature distances. Journal of New Music Research 24:282-298.
26. Vicsi, K., M. Mattila, and P. Berényi. 1990. Continuous speech recognition using different methods. Acustica 71:152.