Cabralea canjerana subsp. polytricha (Adri. Juss.) Penn (Meliaceae), a dioecious species;Cabralea canjerana subsp. polytricha (Adri. Juss.) Penn. (Meliaceae), uma espécie dióica

Acta Botanica Brasilica

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 167-175

  Fuzeto, Adriana Paula ^a   Barbosa, Ana Angélica Almeida ^a   Lomônaco, Cecília ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF UBERLÂNDIA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Breeding system; Cabralea canjerana; Dioecy; Savanna

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847090891     PISSN: 01023306     EISSN: 1677941X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0102-33062001000200003     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ashton, P. S. 1969. Speciation among tropical forest trees: some deductions in the light of recent evidence. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 1: 155-196.
2. Barreiros, H. D. S. & Souza, D. S. E. 1986. Notas Geográficas e Taxonômicas sobre Cabralea canjerana (Vell.) Mart. no Brasil (Meliaceae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia 46 (1): 17-26.
3. Bawa, K. S. & Opler, P. A. 1978. Why are pistillate in inflorescences of Simarouba glauca eaten less than staminate inflorescence? Evolution 32: 673-678.
4. Bawa, K. S.; Perry, D. R. & Beach, J. H. 1985. Reproductive biology of tropical lowland rain forest trees. I. Sexual systems and incompatibility mechanisms. American Journal of Botany 72: 331-345.
5. Bawa, K. S. 1980. Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 15-39.
6. Bawa, K. S. 1974. Breeding systems of tree species of a lowland tropical community. Evolution 31: 52-36.
7. Beach, J. H. & Bawa, K. S. 1980. Role of pollinators in the evolution of dioecy from distily. Evolution 34: 1138-1142.
8. Bullock, S. H. 1985. Breeding systems in the flora of a tropical dioecious forest. Biotropica 17: 287-301.
9. Charlesworth, B. & Charlesworth, D. 1978. A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. The American Naturalist 112: 975-997.
10. Cruden, R. W. 1988. Temporal dioecism, systematic breadth, associated traits and temporal patterns. Botanical Gazzete 149: 1-15.
11. Freeman, C. D.; Doust, J. L.; El-Keblawy, A.; Kathleen, M. J. & Mcarthur, E. D. 1997. Sexual specialization and inbreeding avoidance in the evolution of dioecy. The Botanical Review 63:(1): 65-92.
12. Givnish, T. J. 1982. Outcrossing versus ecological constraints in the evolution of dioecy. The American Naturalist 119: 849-865.
13. Janzen, D. H. 1977. A note on optimal mate selection by plants. The American Naturalist 111: 365-371.
14. Lloyd, D. G. 1975. The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in angiosperms. Genetica 45: 325-339.
15. Lloyd, D. G. 1982. Selection of combined versus separate sexes in seed plants. The American Naturalist 120: 571-585.
16. Medina, D. M. & Conagin, H. T. M. 1964. Técnica citológica. Instituto Agronômico, Campinas (Publ. 2610)
17. Pennington, T. D.; Styles, B. D. & Taylor, D. A.H. 1981. Meliaceae. Flora Neotropica Monograph 28: 235-244.
18. Renner, S. S. & Ricklefs, R. E. 1995. Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. American Journal of Botany 82: 596-606.
19. Rizzini, C. T. 1977. A germinação de Cabralea polytricha Juss. em confronto com C. laevis C.D.C. (MELIACEAE). Leandra 6-7 (7): 23-33.
20. Rosa, R., Lima; S. C. & Assunção, W. L. 1991. Abordagem preliminar das condições climáticas de Uberlândia. Sociedade & Natureza (5/6): 91-108.
21. Ross, M. D. 1982. Five evolutionary pathways to subdioecy. The American Naturalist 119: 297-318.
22. Snow, A. 1994. Post pollination selection and male fitness in plants. The American Naturalist 144: 69-83.
23. Thomson, J. D. & Barret, S. C. H. 1981. Selection for outcrossing, sexual selection and evolution of dioecy in plants. The American Naturalist 118: 443-449.
24. Willson, M. F. 1994. Sexual selection in plants: perspectives and overview. The American Naturalist 144:13-39.
25. Zar, J. H. 1982. Biostatistical analysis. Pratice Hall, Inc., New Jersey. 718p.