A non-diffusive, divergence-free, finite volume-based double projection method on non-staggered grids

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 53, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1127-1172

  Aprovitola, A ^a   Denaro, F M ^a  

^a SECOND UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES   (Italy)

Author keywords

Approximate projection methods; Exact projection methods; Finite volume methods; Helmholtz Hodge decomposition; Non staggered grids

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE VOLUME METHOD; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; THEOREM PROVING;

APPROXIMATE PROJECTION METHODS; EXACT PROJECTION METHODS; HELMHOLTZ-HODGE DECOMPOSITION; NON-STAGGERED GRIDS;

INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW;

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE VOLUME METHOD; INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; THEOREM PROVING;

EID: 33847071546     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: 10970363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.1368     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Gresho PM. Incompressible fluid dynamics: some fundamental formulation issues. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 1991; 23:413-453.
2. Hodge WVD. The Theory and Application of Harmonic Integrals. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA, 1952.
3. Weil H. The method of orthogonal projection in potential theory. Duke Mathematical Journal 1940; 7:411-444.
4. Ladyzhenskaja OA. The Mathematical Theory of Viscous Incompressible Flow. Gordon and Breach: New York, 1963.
5. Chorin AJ. Numerical solution of the Navier-Stokes equations. Mathematics of Computation 1968; 22:745-762.
6. Temam R. Sur L'approximation de la Solution des Équations de Navier-Stokes par la Méthode de Pas Fractionnaires (II). Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 1969; 33:377-385.
7. Chorin AJ, Marsden JE. A Mathematical Introduction to Fluid Mechanics. Texts in Applied Mathematics, vol. 4. Springer: Berlin, 1990.
8. Denaro FM. On the application of the Helmholtz-Hodge decomposition in projection methods for the numerical solution of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations with general boundary conditions. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2003; 43:43-69.
9. Vinokur M. An analysis of finite-difference and finite-volume formulations of conservation laws. Journal of Computational Physics 1989; 81:1-52.
10. LeVeque RJ. Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2002.
11. Harlow FH, Welch JE. Numerical calculation of time-dependent viscous incompressible flow of fluid with a free surface. Physics of Fluids 1965; 8:2182-2189.
12. Iannelli P, Denaro FM, De Stefano G. A deconvolution-based fourth order finite volume method for incompressible flows on non-uniform grids. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2003; 43:431-462.
13. Chorin AJ. On the convergence of discrete approximations to the Navier-Stokes equations. Mathematics of Computation 1969; 23:341-353.
14. Rider WJ. Approximate projection methods for incompressible flow: implementation, variants and robustness. Technical Report LA-UR-200, Los Alamos National Laboratory, 1995.
15. Sotiropoulos F, Abdallah S. The discrete continuity equation in primitive variable solutions of incompressible flow. Journal of Computational Physics 1991; 95:212-227.
16. Almgren AS, Bell JB, Szymczak WG. A numerical method for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations based on an approximate projection. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 1996; 17:358-369.
17. Minion ML. A projection method for locally refined grids. Journal of Computational Physics 1996; 127:158-178.
18. Martin DF, Colella P. A cell-centered adaptive projection method for the incompressible Euler equations. Journal of Computational Physics 2000; 163:271-312.
19. Guy RD, Fogelson AL. Stability of approximate projection methods on cell-centered grids. Journal of Computational Physics 2005; 203:517-538.
20. Ferziger JH, Peric M. Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics. Springer: Berlin, 2002.
21. Almgren AS, Bell JB, Crutchfield W. Approximate projection methods: Part I. Inviscid analsysis. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 2000; 22(4):1139-1159.
22. Rhie CM, Chow WL. Numerical study of the turbulent flow past an airfoil with trailing edge separation. AIAA Journal 1983; 21:1525-1532.
23. Zang Y, Street RL, Koseff JR. A non-staggered grid, fractional step method for time-dependent incompressible Navier-Stokes equations in curvilinear coordinates. Journal of Computational Physics 1994; 114:18-33.
24. Kim D, Choi H. A second-order time-accurate finite volume method for unsteady incompressible flow on hybrid unstructured grids. Journal of Computational Physics 2000; 162:411-428.
25. Dormy E. An accurate treatment of pressure for collocated variables. Journal of Computational Physics 1999; 151:676-683.
26. Rider WJ. Filtering non-solenoidal modes in numerical solutions of incompressible flows. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2003; 28:789-814.
27. Stevens DE, Chan ST, Gresho P. An approximate projection method for incompressible flows. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2002; 40:1303-1325.
28. Iannelli P, Denaro FM. Analysis of the local truncation error in the pressure-free projection method for the Navier-Stokes equations: a new accurate expression of the boundary conditions. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2003; 42:399-437.
29. Denaro FM. Time-accurate intermediate boundary conditions for large Eddy simulations based on projection methods. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2005; 48:869-908.
30. Brown DL, Cortez R, Minion ML. Accurate projection methods for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Journal of Computational Physics 2001; 168:464-499.
31. Kim J, Moin P. Application of a fractional-step method to incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Journal of Computational Physics 1985; 59:308-323.
32. Sagaut P. Large Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows. An Introduction (2nd edn). Springer: Berlin, 2002.
33. Aprovitola A, Denaro FM. On the application of congruent upwind discretizations for large eddy simulations. Journal of Computational Physics 2004; 194(1):329-343.
34. Perot JB. An analysis of the fractional step method. Journal of Computational Physics 1993; 108:51-58.
35. Abdallah S. Comments on the fractional step method. Journal of Computational Physics 1995; 117:179-180.
36. Perot JB. Comments on the fractional step method. Journal of Computational Physics 1995; 121:190-191.
37. Liu WEJG. Projection method I: Convergence and numerical boundary layers. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 1995; 32(4):1017-1057.
38. Liu WEJG. Projection method II: Godunov-Ryabenki analysis. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 1996; 33(4):1597-1621.
39. Liu WEJG. Finite difference schemes for incompressible flows in the velocity-impulse formulation. Journal of Computational Physics 1997; 130:67-76.
40. Shen J. On error estimates of the projection methods for the Navier-Stokes equations: second-order schemes. Mathematics of Computation 1996; 65:1039-1065.
41. Guermond JL. Un Résultat de Convergence d'Ordre Deux En Temps Pour L'Approximation Des Équations De Navier-Stokes Par Une Technique De Projection Incrémentale. Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis 1999; 33(1):169-189.
42. Wetton BR. Analysis of the spatial error for a class of finite difference methods for viscous incompressibile flows. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 1997; 34:723-755.
43. Wetton BR. Error analysis for Chorin's original projection method with regularization in space and time. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 1997; 34:1683-1697.
44. Strikwerda JC, Lee YS. The accuracy of the fractional step method. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 1999; 37(1):37-47.
45. Sussman M. A second-order coupled level set and volume-of-fluid method for computing growth and collapse of vapour bubbles. Journal of Computational Physics 2003; 187:110-136.