Neonatal mortality for low-risk women by method of delivery [3]

Birth

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 101-102

  MacDorman, Marian F ^a   Declercq, Eugene ^a   Menacker, Fay ^a   Malloy, Michael H ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASPHYXIA; BIRTH; BIRTH CERTIFICATE; CESAREAN SECTION; ELECTIVE SURGERY; HUMAN; LABOR COMPLICATION; LETTER; NEWBORN MORTALITY; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

APGAR SCORE; CAUSE OF DEATH; CESAREAN SECTION; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT MORTALITY; INFANT, NEWBORN; PREGNANCY; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33847060026     PISSN: 07307659     EISSN: 1523536X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00155_3.x     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. MacDorman MF, Declerq E, Menacker F, Malloy MH. Infant and neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to women with "no indicated risk," United States, 1998-2001 birth cohorts. Birth 2006;33(3):175-182.
2. Gamble JA, Creedy DK. Women's request for a cesarean section: A critique of the literature. Birth 2000;27(4):256-263.
3. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD Health Data 2005, A Comparative Analysis of 30 Countries. Paris, France: Author, June, 2005.