A novel mathematical model of the sagittal spine

Spine

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 466-470

  Yang, Benson P ^a,b   Yang, Carina W ^a   Ondra, Stephen L ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Deformity; Model; Sagittal balance; Scoliosis; Spine; Spline

Indexed keywords

AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CERVICAL SPINE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEIGHT; HUMAN; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; INTRARATER RELIABILITY; LUMBAR SPINE; MALE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NORMAL HUMAN; POSITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACRAL SPINAL CORD; SPINE DISEASE; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; THORACIC SPINE; THORACOLUMBAR SPINE; VERTEBRA BODY;

ADULT; AREA UNDER CURVE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SPINE; THORACIC VERTEBRAE;

EID: 33847055767     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000255207.44141.e9     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bernhardt M, Bridwell KH. Segmental analysis of the sagittal plane alignment of the normal thoracic and lumbar spines and thoracolumbar junction. Spine 1989;14:717-21.
2. Itoi E. Roentgenographic analysis of posture in spinal osteoporotics. Spine 1991;16:750-6.
3. Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell KH, et al. Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine 2005;30:682-8.
4. Ondra SL. Spinal deformity: The role of the neurosurgeon. Clin Neurosurg 2002;50:228-38.
5. Jackson RP, Hales C. Congruent spinopelvic alignment on standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers. Spine 2000;25:2808-2815.
6. Jackson RP, Peterson MD, McManus AC, et al. Compensatory spinopelvic balance over the hip axis and better reliability in measuring lordosis to the pelvic radius on standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and patients. Spine 1998;23:1750-67.
7. Swank SM, Mauri TM, Brown JC. The lumbar lordosis below Harrington instrumentation for scoliosis. Spine 1990;15:181-6.
8. Vendantam R, Lenke LG, Keeney JA, et al. Comparison of standing sagittal spinal alignment in asymptomatic adolescents and adults. Spine 1998;23:211-5.
9. Van Royen BJ, Toussaint HM, Kingma I, et al. Accuracy of the sagittal vertical axis in a standing lateral radiograph as a measurement of balance in spinal deformities. Eur Spine J 1998;7:408-12.
10. Gelb DE, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers. Spine 1995;20:1351-8.
11. Jackson RP, McManus AC. Radiographic analysis of sagittal plane alignment and balance in standing volunteers and patients with low back pain matched for age, sex, and size. A prospective controlled clinical study. Spine 1994;19:1611-8.
12. de Boor C. A Practical Guide to Spines. New York, NY: Springer Verlag; 2001.
13. Bethune DD, Broekhoven LH, Kung E, et al. Statistical method for evaluating human thoracolumbar spinal curves in the sagittal plane: A preliminary report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986;67:590-4.
14. Bryant JT, Reid JG, Smith BL, et al. Method for determining vertebral body positions in the sagittal plane using skin markers. Spine 1988;14:258-65.
15. Rajnics P, Pomero V, Templier A, et al. Computer-assisted assessment of spinal sagittal plane radiographs. J Spinal Disord 2001;14:135-42.
16. Horton WC, Brown CW, Bridwell KH, et al. Is there an optimal patient stance for obtaining a lateral 36 radiograph?: A critical comparison of three techniques. Spine 2005;30:427-33.
17. O'Brien MF, Kuklo TR, Blanke KM, et al., eds. Spinal Deformity Study Group Radiographic Measurement Manual. Memphis, TN: Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA; 2004.
18. Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 1989;45:255-68.
19. Lin LI. A note on the concordance correlation coefficient. Biometrics 2000;56.