Finally getting closure?: Editorial

International Journal of Clinical Practice

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 355-356

  Finlay, Malcolm ^a   Kapur, Akhil ^a  

^a LONDON CHEST HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; CLIP; DEVICE; EDITORIAL; HEMOSTASIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; SUTURE; VASCULAR CLOSURE DEVICE;

EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEMOSTATIC TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE;

EID: 33847043943     PISSN: 13685031     EISSN: 17421241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.01228.x     Document Type: Editorial

References (6)

1. Koreny M, Riedmuller E, Nikfardjam M et al. Arterial puncture closing devices compared with standard manual compression after cardiac catheterisation. Systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2004; 291: 350-7.
2. Behan M et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing the routine use of an Angio-Seal STS device strategy with conventional femoral haemostasis methods in a district general hospital. Int J Clin Pract 2007; 61: 367-72.
3. Legrand V, Doneux P, Martinez C et al. Femoral access management: comparison between two different vascular closure devices after percutaneous coronary intervention. Acta Cardiol 2005; 60: 482-8.
4. Kim HY, Choo SW, Roh HG et al. Efficacy of femoral vascular closure devices in patients treated with anticoagulant, abciximab or thrombolytics during percutaneous endovascular procedures. Korean J Radiol 2006; 7: 35-40.
5. Hermiller J, Simonton C, Hinohara T et al. Clinical experience with a circumferential clip-based vascular closure device in diagnostic catheterization. J Invasive Cardiol 2005; 17: 504-10.
6. Hoffer EK, Bloch RD. Percutaneous arterial closure devices. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14: 865-85.