Fuzzy multi-criteria analysis approach for the evaluation and classification of cognitive performance factors in flexible manufacturing systems

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1101-1118

  Eraslan, E ^a   Kurt, M ^b  

^a BASKENT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b GAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Cognitive mapping; Cognitive performance factors; Flexible manufacturing systems; Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (AHP); Performance measurement

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; DECISION MAKING; FUZZY CONTROL; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; MAPPING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

ABSTRACT FACTORS; COGNITIVE MAPPING; COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE; COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE FACTORS; FUZZY ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP); PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT;

FLEXIBLE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS;

EID: 33847028845     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: 1366588X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207540600654483     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Axelrod, R., Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites, 1976 (Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ).
2. Brezocnik, M., Balic, J. and Brezocnik, Z., Emergence of intelligence in next-generation manufacturing systems. Robot. Comput.-lntegr. Manuf, 2003, 19, 55-63.
3. Deng, H., Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison. Int. J. Approx. Reason., 1999, 21, 215-231.
4. Eden, C. and Ackerman, F., Cognitive mapping expert views for policy analysis in the public sector. Eur. J. Oper., 2004, 152(3), 615-630.
5. Eraslan, E. and Kurt, M., A fuzzy multi-criteria analysis approach for assessing the performance of modern manufacturing systems, in Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering, 2005, pp. 605-610.
6. Hodgkinson, G.P., Maule, A.J. and Bown, N.C., Causal cognitive mapping in the organizational strategy field; a comparison of alternative elicitation procedures. Organiz. Res. Meth., 2004, 7(1), 3-26.
7. Hollnagel, E., Extended cognition and the future of ergonomics. Theoret. Issue. Ergonom. Sci., 2001, 2(3), 309-315.
8. Lang, S.Y.T., Dickinson, J. and Buchal, R.A., Cognitive factors in distributed design. Comput. Ind., 2000, 48, 89-98.
9. Morray, N., Identifying mental models of complex human-machine systems. Int. J. Ind. Ergonom., 1998, 22, 293-297.
10. Pervin, L.A., Personality, p. 507, 1984 (Wiley: New York).
11. Rauterberg, M., A method of quantitative measurements of cognitive complexity, in Human-Computer Interaction: Tasks and Organization, pp. 295-307, 1992 (CUD Publishing: Rome).
12. Rauterberg, M., Schluep, S. and Fjeld, M., How to model behavioural and cognitive complexity in human-computer interaction with Petri nets, in IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication, 1997, pp. 320-325.
13. Saaty, T.L., The Analytical Hierarchy Process, 1980 (McGraw-Hill: New York).
14. Saaty, T.L., The analytic hierarchy and analytic network processes, in Conference Notes of ISAHP, 1999, Kobe, Japan.
15. Suwingnjo, P., Bititci, U.S. and Carrie, A.S., Quantitative models for performance measurement system. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 2000, 64, 231-241.
16. Tang, K., Koubek, R.J., Lighter, N.J. and Salvendy, G., Development and validation of a theoretical model for cognitive skills acquisition. Int. J. Ind. Ergonom., 1999, 24, 25-38.
17. Tegarden, D.P. and Sheetz, S.D., Group cognitive mapping: a methodology and system for capturing and evaluating managerial and organizational cognition. Omega, 2003, 31(2), 113-125.
18. Zhang, Q., Vonderembse, M.A. and Lim, J., Manufacturing flexibility: defining and analysing relationships among competence, capability, and customer satisfaction. J. Oper. Manag., 2003, 21, 173-191.