Ranking the effect of [1A(ax), 1B(eq)] versus [1A(eq), 1B(ax)] cyclohexane ring substitution on the 1H chemical shifts of γ-methylene cyclohexane ring protons using 2,2-disubstituted adamantanes as models

Tetrahedron Letters

Volumn 48, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 2117-2122

  Kolocouris, Antonios ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

2,2 Disubstituted adamantanes; 1H NMR chemical shifts; Axial cyclohexane conformer; Chemical shift difference

Indexed keywords

ADAMANTANE DERIVATIVE; CARBENE; CYCLOHEXANE DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PROTON TRANSPORT; SUBSTITUTION REACTION;

EID: 33847027694     PISSN: 00404039     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2007.01.121     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. See, for example:. Klod S., Koch A., and Kleipenter E. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 (2002) 1506
2. Cuevas G., Juaristi E., and Vela A. THEOCHEM 418 (1997) 231
3. See, for example:. Schleyer P.v.R., Maerker C., Dansfeld A., Jiao H., and Hommes N.J.R.v.E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118 (1996) 6317
4. Abraham R.J., Griffiths L., and Warne M.A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 (1997) 31
5. Sefzik T.H., Turco D., Iuliucci R.J., and Facelli J.C. J. Phys. Chem. A 109 (2005) 1180 and references cited therein
6. The shift occurring on the resonances of a carbon (upfield) and the attached protons (downfield) when a substituent is placed with a γ-gauche arrangement; after the original interpretation, which emphasized the steric interactions between hydrogen atoms and the C(γ) carbon atom (. Eliel E.L., Bailey W.F., Kopp L.D., Willer R.L., Grant D.M., Bertrand R., Christensen K.H., Walling D.K., Duch M.W., Wenkert E., Schell F.M., and Cochran D.W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 97 (1975) 322
7. Grant D.M., and Paul E.G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 86 (1964) 2984
8. ), the stereoelectronic origin of this effect still remains unknown (. Barfield M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117 (1995) 2862 )
9. See, for example:. Lambert J.B., and Takeuchi Y. Org. Magn. Reson. 1 (1969) 345
10. Eliel E.L., Rao V.S., Vierhapper F.W., and Juaristi G.Z. Tetrahedron Lett. (1975) 4339
11. Eliel E.L., and Martin R.J.L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 90 (1968) 682
12. Kleipenter E., Taddei F., and Wacker P. Chem. Eur. J. 9 (2003) 1360
13. Kleipenter E., Rolla N., Koch A., and Taddei P. J. Org. Chem. 71 (2006) 4393
14. See, for example:. Eliel E.L., and Manoharan M. J. Org. Chem. 46 (1981) 1959
15. Engler E.M., Andose J.D., and Schleyer P.v.R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 95 (1973) 8005
16. Belanger-Giarepy F., Brisse F., Harvey P.D., Butler I.S., and Gilson D.F.R. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C 43 (1987) 756
17. van Deursen F.W., and Korver P.K. Tetrahedron Lett. (1967) 8145
18. van Deursen F.W., and Bakker J. Tetrahedron 27 (1971) 4593
19. Abraham R.J., and Fisher J. Magn. Reson. Chem. 23 (1985) 862
20. Duddeck H., Hollowood F., Karim A., and McKervey M.A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 (1979) 360
21. Duddeck H. Top. Stereochem. 16 (1986) 219
22. 3 solution of amine 5 (50 mg) with TFA (two drops) inside the NMR tube and the mixture was left to equilibrate for several weeks before recording the NMR spectra; compounds 7 and 8 were prepared according to Ref. 11a.
23. Between the numerous synthesized aminoadamantane derivatives, 2-alkyl-2-adamantanamines (e.g., compounds 2-5, 7, 8) were the most potent in vitro. For some representative examples see:. Kolocouris N., Kolocouris A., Foscolos G.B., Fytas G., Neyts J., Padalko E., Balzarini J., Snoeck R., Andrei G., and De Clercq E. J. Med. Chem. 39 (1996) 3307
24. Zoidis G., Kolocouris N., Fytas G., Foscolos G.B., Kolocouris A., Fytas G., Karayannis P., Padalko E., Neyts J., and De Clercq E. Antiviral Chem. Chemother. 14 (2003) 155
25. Stylianakis I., Kolocouris A., Kolocouris N., Fytas G., Foscolos G.B., Padalko E., Neyts J., and De Clercq E. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 13 (2003) 1699
26. Kolocouris A., Hansen R., and Broadhurst R.W. J. Med. Chem. 47 (2004) 4975
27. Kolocouris, A.; Broadhurst, R. W.; Zikos, C. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., submitted for publication.
28. 13C spectra of some 2,2-disubstituted adamantanes have been analyzed (. Krishnamurthy V., Iyer P.S., and Olah G.A. J. Org. Chem. 48 (1983) 3373
29. 1H NMR spectra
30. MM3 (J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 11918) and MMFF94 (J. Comp. Chem. 1996, 17, 587) force fields are implemented in pcmodel (version 9.0), Serena Software.
31. 1H correlation experiments a relaxation delay of 2 s was used; 2D NOE phase sensitive experiments were run using a mixing time of 1.5 s.
32. The interaction of groups that are close in space normally results in shielding of the carbon and deshielding of the protons involved. A remarkable demonstration of a steric compression effect is the δ- or ε-effect on the proton chemical shifts in some tetracyclic norbornyl systems, where the repulsion between groups separated by four or five bonds is so severe that the compressed proton appears uncommonly downfield by 3.1-3.5 ppm, but also, the uncompressed proton moves compensatingly upfield by 0.8-0.9 ppm (. Winstein S.P., Carter P., Anet F.A.L., and Bourn A.J.R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 95 (1973) 8005 )
33. Allinger N.L., and Tribble M.T. Tetrahedron Lett. (1971) 3259
34. For example, the chemical shift difference within the 4′,9′-H methylene in the case of 2-adamantanol or 2-t-Bu-adamantane is only ∼0.10 ppm; in these cases axial -OH or -t-Bu groups adopt an equatorial position with respect to the 1′-2′-3′-4′-5′-9′ cyclohexane ring (see Scheme 1, A = H, B = OH or t-Bu).
35. Bushweller C.H. Stereodynamics of Cyclohexane and Substituted Cyclohexanes. Substituent A Values. In: Juaristi E. (Ed). Conformational Behaviour of Six-Membered Rings (1995), VCH, New York 25
36. 3,7]decane protons
37. 1H NMR spectra of compounds 1-19 was striking; this high spectrum resolution is important for the liquid-state NMR measurements focusing on how suitable reporter adamantane derivatives contact with the transmembrane portion of the influenza A M2 protein receptor embedded in lipid bilayers (see, for example, Ref. 12a and also:. Wang J., Schnell J.R., and Chou J.J. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 324 (2004) 212 )
38. Abraham R.J., and Fisher J. Magn. Reson. Chem. 23 (1985) 856-861
39. Kolocouris A., Mikros E., and Kolocouris N. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 (1998) 1701-1708