Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Equine Patient: A Comparison of High- and Low-Field Systems

Clinical Techniques in Equine Practice

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 37-45

  Werpy, Natasha M ^a  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

equine; field strength; magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

EQUIDAE;

EID: 33847027332     PISSN: 15347516     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.ctep.2006.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Bushberg J.T. Nuclear magnetic resonance, in The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging. (ed 2) vol 1 (2002), Lippincott, Philadelphia, PA 373-467
2. Tucker R.L. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in equine musculoskeletal conditions. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 17 (2001) 145-157
3. Ziedses des Plantes B.G., and Koster K. Letter to the editor. Eur J Radiol 20 (1995) 156-158
4. Rutt B.K., and Lee D.H. The impact of field strength on image quality in MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 6 (1996) 57-62
5. Peterfy C.G., Roberts T., and Genant H.K. Dedicated extremity MR imaging: an emerging technology. Radiol Clin North Am 35 (1997) 1-19
6. Hoult D.I., Chen C.N., and Sank V.J. The field dependence of NMR imaging. Magn Reson Med 3 (1986) 722-746
7. Boska M.D., Hubesch B., Meyerhoff D.J., et al. Comparison of P-31 MRS and H-1 MRI at 1.5 and 2.0 T. Magn Reson Med 13 (1990) 228-238
8. Shellock F.G. Guide to MR Procedures and Metallic Objects: Update 2000. (ed 6) (2000), Williams & Williams Healthcare, Philadelphia, PA, Lippincott
9. Barnett M.J. MR diagnosis of internal derangements of the knee: effect of field strength on efficacy. Am J Radiol 161 (1993) 115-118
10. Taouli B., Zaim S., Peterfy C., et al. Rheumatoid arthritis of the hand and wrist: comparison of three imaging techniques. Am J Radiol 182 (2003) 937-943
11. Kladny B., Gluckert K., Swoboda B., et al. Comparison of low-field (0.2 Tesla) and high-field (1.5 Tesla) magnetic resonance imaging of the knee joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 114 (1995) 281-286
12. Rand T., Imhof H., Turetschek K., et al. Comparison of low field (0.2T) and high field (1.5T) MR imaging in the differentiation of torned from intact menisci. Eur J Radiol 30 (1999) 22-27
13. Denoix J.M. The Equine Distal Limb: An Atlas of Clinical Anatomy and Comparative Imaging (2000), Manson Publishing, London 1-373