Let us not ignore women's concerns and wishes from developing countries: Commentary

Birth

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 51-52

  Chalmers, Beverley ^a,b  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b RPO Princess   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CESAREAN SECTION; CHILDBIRTH; CHILDBIRTH PLANNING; DEVELOPING COUNTRY; ECONOMIC ASPECT; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MASS MEDIUM; MATERNAL BEHAVIOR; NOTE; OBSTETRICS; PLANNING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC OPINION; VAGINAL DELIVERY; WOMEN'S RIGHTS;

DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LABOR, OBSTETRIC; MATERNAL WELFARE; MEXICO; MOTHERS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POVERTY; PREGNANCY; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; WOMEN'S RIGHTS;

EID: 33847025307     PISSN: 07307659     EISSN: 1523536X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00127.x     Document Type: Note

References (4)

1. Yam EA, Grossman AA, Goldman LA, Garcia SG. Introducing birth plans in Mexico: An exploratory study in a hospital serving low-income Mexicans. Birth 2007;34:42-48.
2. Price MR, Broomberg J. The impact of fee-for-service reimbursement system on the utilization of health services: Part III. A comparison of caesarean section rates in white nulliparous women in the private and public sectors. S Afr Med J 1990;78:136-138.
3. Chalmers B, McIntyre J. South African obstetrician's views on caesarean section. S Afr Med J 1991;82:161-164.
4. Villar J, Valladores E, Wojdyla D, et al. Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: The 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Lancet 2006; May 23 DOI: 1016/S0140-6736(06)68704-7.