Paradigms and paradoxes of agricultural risk governance

International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 444-457

  Suder, Gabriele ^a   Gillingham, David W ^b  

^a SKEMA BUSINESS SCHOOL   (France)

^b Institute for Clean Growth and Future Mobility   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Ambiguity; Error model; Mutual trust governance; Risk management; Top down governance

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847023005     PISSN: 14668297     EISSN: 17415241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/IJRAM.2007.011992     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Consumers in Europe Group (Ed) (1998) The Consumer and the Common Agricultural Policy, London.
2. Council Directive 81/851/EC of 28 September 1981: as amended by 90/676/EEC and 93/40/EEC, on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to veterinary medicinal products.
3. Council Directive 90/167/EC of 26 March 1990, laying down the conditions governing the preparation, placing on the market and use of medicated feedingstuffs in the community.
4. Council Directive 96/22/EC of 29 April 1996, concerning the prohibition on the use in stockfarming of certain substances having a hormonal or thyrostatic action and of beta-agonists, and repealing Directives 81/602/EEC, 88/146/EEC and 88/299/EEC.
5. Council Directive 96/23/EC of 29 April 1996, on measures to monitor certain substances and residues thereof in live animals and animal products and repealing Directives 85/358/EEC and 86/469/EEC and Decisions 89/187/EEC and 91/664/EEC.
6. Denis-Lempereur, J. (2000) 'Opinion publique et securité environnementale', La Revue Internationale et Stratégique, 39, August.
7. Dunning, J.H. (Ed) (1993) The Theory of Transnational Corporations, The United Nations Library on Transnational Corporations, London and New York: Routledge.
8. Gillingham, D.W., Blanco, J. and Lewko, J. (1997) 'An integrated model of error management', Disaster Prevention and Management, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp.186-190.
9. Hériard Dulreiul, G. et al. (2002) 'A report of trust-net on risk governance - lessons learned', Journal of Risk Research, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp.83-95.
10. Kogut, B. (1985) 'Designing global strategies: profiting from operational flexibility', Sloan Management Review, Vol. 26, pp.27-38.
11. Shaluf et al. (2003) Disaster Prevention and Management, Vol. 12, No. 1.
12. Slovic, P. (2000) The Perception of Risk, London: Earthscan.
13. Suder, G. (2004) '...and piglet, tool', ECCH Case Study, University of Cranfield.
14. ATTAC (2002) Trade Policy Review: The European Union, Geneva: World Trade Organisation.
15. Boniface, P. (Ed) (2002) L'Année Stratégique 2001 - Analyse des Enjeux Stratégiques, Démographiques et Economiques, Paris: Editions Michalons.
16. Buchner, M., Loeckx, M. and Salomon, B. (2001) Gesundheitsrisiko Schweinefleisch. Die Kriminellen Praktiken in der Tierhaltung, Wien: Czernin Verlag.
17. Chevallier, D. (2000) 'La transparence et la sécurité sanitaire de la filière alimentaire en France', Paris: Rapport Parlementaire (Parliament Report).
18. Commission of the European Communities (1997) 'White Paper for a community strategy and action plan', Brussels, COM (97)599.
19. Commission of the European Communities (1998) 'Commission decision 98/139/EC of 4 February 1998: laying down certain detailed rules concerning on-the-spot checks carried out in the veterinary field by commission experts in the Member States'.
20. Commission of the European Communities (1999) 'White Paper on food safety', COM (99)719.
21. Commission of the European Communities (2000a) The Trustnet Framework: A New Perspective on Risk Governance, Brussels: DGRT.
22. Commission of the European Communities (2000b) Healthy Food for Europe's Citizens, Luxembourg.
23. Commission of the European Communities (2001) 'Amended proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and the Council', COM (2001)475.
24. Dake, K. (1992) 'Myths of nature: culture and the social construction of risk', Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 48, pp.21-27.
25. DEFRA (Ed) (2002) An Overview of Agricultural Policy, London.
26. Fessenden-Raden, J., Fitchen, J.M. and Heath, J.S. (1987) 'Providing risk information in communities: factors influencing what is heard and accepted', Science Technology and Human Values, Vol. 12, pp.94-101.
27. FVO (2001) Final report of a mission carried out in Germany from 07/05/01 to 18/05/02, DG SANCO (2001) MR Final, SANCO/3267/2001, Brussels.
28. GD SANCO/3267/2001 (08.08.2001) Berichtsentwurf des Lebensmittel - und Veterinäramtes der Europäischen Kommission über den Inspektionsbesuch zur Bewertung der Rückstandskontrolle in lebenden Tieren und tierischen Erzeugnissen in Deutschland vom 07.05.-18.05.2001, Report.
29. Grant, W. (2002) WynGrant's Common Agricultural Policy Page, Warwick.
30. Hériard Dulreiul, G. (1997) L'Accéptabilité du Risque Entre Choix Individuel et Construction Sociale, Paris: Annales des Mines, pp.67-75.
31. Horlick-Jones, T., Georgiou, I., Ravetz, J. and Lofstede, R. (2000) 'Decision supports for organisational risk management by problem structuring', Health, Risk and Society, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp.141-165.
32. Institut de Protection et de Sureté Nucleaire (1999) Protection des Risques et de la Securite 1999: Resultats du Sondage d'Octobre 1999, Paris: IPSN.
33. Mars, G. and Weir, D.H.T. (2000) Risk Management, Dartmouth, London, New York: Ashgate.
34. Retterer, S. (2000) Tracabilité et Protection Alimentaire, Toulon: University of Toulon.