Ethical criteria for substitute decision-making in people without capacity;Criterios éticos para las decisiones sanitarias al final de la vida de personas incapaces

Revista Espanola de Salud Publica

Volumn 80, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 303-315

  Cantalejo, Inés Ma Barrio ^a,c   Lorda, Pablo Simón ^b  

^a FIBAO   (Spain)

^b ANDALUSIAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Spain)

^c NONE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Advance care planning; Legal guardians; Living hill; Mental competency; Mental incompetency; Proxy; Third party consent

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; LEGAL ASPECT; LIVING WILL; MENTAL CAPACITY; SPAIN; UNITED STATES;

DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; LIVING WILLS; MENTAL COMPETENCY; SPAIN; THIRD-PARTY CONSENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33847019628     PISSN: 11355727     EISSN: 16969820     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Boletín Oficial del Estado. Ley 41/2002, de 14 de noviembre, básica reguladora de la autonomía del paciente y de derechos y obligaciones en materia de información y documentación clínica. BOE del 15/11/2002.
2. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1983. p. 132.
3. a ed. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1994. p. 170-180.
4. Olick RS. Taking Advance Directives Seriously. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, 2001. p. 45-76.
5. Buchanan AE, Brock DW. Deciding for Others. The Ethics of Surrogate Decision - Making. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press 1989; p. 122-134.
6. Simón P y Barrio IM. ¿Quién decidirá por mí? Triacastela, Madrid, 2004. p. 38-41.
7. Paris JJ. Court Intervention and the Diminution of Patient's Rights: The Case of Brother Joseph Fox. NEJM 1980; 303(15):876-8
8. Annas GJ. Quinlan, Saickewicz, and Now Brother Fox. Hastings Cent Rep 1980; (June):20-21.
9. Simón P y Barrio IM. Simón P y Barrio IM. ¿Quién decidirá por mí? Triacastela, Madrid, 2004. p. 26-34.
10. Gafo J. La Eutanasia. Madrid: Temas de Hoy, 1989. p. 32.
11. Baergen R. Revising the Substituted Judgment Standard. J Clin Ethics 1995; 6(1):30-8.
12. Es la que emplean tanto la President's Commission, como Buchanan & Brock, como Beauchamp y Childress.
13. The Multi - Society Task Force on PVS. Medical Aspects of the Persistent Vegetative State (I & II) NEJM 1994; 330(21):1499-1507; 330(22):1572-79.
14. Quinlan Decision and «Right to Die». March 31, 1976 (In the Matter of Karen Ann Quinlan: An Alleged Incompetent) En: Historic Documents of 1976. Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly Inc; 1977. p.197-219.
15. Branson R, Casebeer K, Levine MD, Oden TC, Ramsey P, Capron AM. The Quinlan Decision: Five Commentaries. Hastings Cent Rep 1976; (February):8-19.
16. Healey JM. The Quinlan case and the mass media. Am J Public Health 1976; 66:295
17. Quinlan Decision and «Right to Die». March 31, 1976 (In the Matter of Karen Ann Quinlan: An Alleged Incompetent) En: Historic Documents of 1976. Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly Inc; 1977. p.197-219.
18. Ruiz Navascués R, Reyes Bermúdez MT, Izaguerri Blázquez MT, Romero Galindo MS, Herguido García F, Martín Cuesta AM, Rodríguez Rodríguez OS, Peñacoba Puente C. Historia clínica de valores y creencias de salud. Nure Investigación 2005; 12 (2). Disponible en: www.nureinvestigacion.es/ FICHEROS_ADMINISTRADOR/INV_NURE/Proyecto12.pdf (citada el 22 de enero de 2006).
19. Buchanan AE y Brock DW. Deciding for Others. The Ethics of Surrogate Decision - Making. New York: Cambridge Univ Press 1989; p.120 -1.
20. Sulmasy DP, Terry PB, Weisman CS, Miller DJ, Stallings RY, Vettese MA, Haller KB. The Accuracy of Substituted Judgments in Patients with Terminal Diagnoses. Ann Intern Med 1998: 128:621-9.
21. Gutheil TG, Appelbaum PS. Substituted judgmente: best interest in disguise. Hastings Cent Rp, 1983;13: 9-10.
22. Emanuel EJ. What Criteria Should Guide Decision Makers for Incompetent Patients? Lancet 1988; (January): 170-1.
23. Zweibel NR, Cassel CK. Treatment Choices at the End of Life: A Comparison of Decisions by Older Patients and Their Physician - Selected Proxies. Gerontologist 1989; 29:615-21.
24. Seckler AB, Meier DE, Mulvihill M, Cammer Paris BE. Substituted Judgment: How Accurate Are Proxy Predictions? Ann Intern Med 1991; 115(2):92-8.
25. Uhlman RF, Pearlman RA, Cain KC. Physicians' and Spouses' Predictions of Elderly Patients' Treatment Preferences. J Gerontology 1988; 43:115-121.
26. Pearlman RA, Uhlman RF, Jecker NS. Spousal Understanding of Patient Quality of Life: Implications for Surrogate Decisions. J Clin Ethics 1992; 3(2):114-21.
27. Hare J, Pratt C, Nelson C. Agreement Between Patients and Their Self - Selected Surrogates on Difficult Medical Decisions. Arch Intern Med 1992; 152:1049-54.
28. Gerety M, Chiodo LK, Kanten DN, Tuley MR, Cornell JE. Medical Treatment Preferences of Nursing Home Residents: Relationship to Function and Concordance with Surrogate Decision - Makers. J Am Geriatr Soc 1993; 41:953-60.
29. Sulmasy DP, Haller K, Terry PB. More Talk, Less Paper: Predicting the Accuracy of Substituted Judgments. Am J Med 1994; 96:432-8.
30. Jacob DA. Family Members' Experiences with Decision Making for Incompetent Patients in the ICU: A Qualitative Study. Am J Crit Care. 1998; 7(1):30-6.
31. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1983. p. 134-5.
32. Simón P y Barrio IM. ¿Quién decidirá por mí? Triacastela, Madrid, 2004: p. 41-5.
33. Annas GJ. Nonfeeding: Lawful Killing in CA, homicide in NJ. Hastings Cent Rep 1983: (December):19-20.
34. Annas GJ. When Procedures Limit Rights: From Quinlan to Conroy. Hastings Cent Rep 1985; (April):24-26.
35. Curran WJ. Defining Appropriate Medical Care: Providing Nutrients and Hydration for the Dying. NEJM 1985; 313(15):940-2.
36. a ed. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1994; pp.174-6.
37. Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division. In the Matter of Claire C. Conroy. En: Beauchamp TL, Walters LeRoy. Contemporary Issues in Bioethics. 4th ed. Belmont: Wadsworth Pub Co 1994:452-4.
38. Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Essex County. In the Matter of Claire C. Conroy. En: Beauchamp TL, Walters LeRoy. Contemporary Issues in Bioethics. 4th ed. Belmont: Wadsworth Pub Co, 1994. p. 450-2.
39. Supreme Court of New Jersey. In the Matter of Claire C. Conroy. 486 A. 2d 1209 - 1250 (NJ 1985).
40. Buchanan AE & Brock DW. Deciding for Others. The Ethics of Surrogate Decision - Making. New York: Cambridge Univ Press; 1989. p. 122-5.
41. Kopelman LM. The Best - Interest Standard as Threshold, Ideal, and Standard of Reasonableness. J Med Philos 1997: 22:271-89.
42. a ed. en inglés). Barcelona: Paidós; 1995. p. 386-7.
43. Emanuel EJ. A Communal Vision of Care for Incompetent Patients. Hastings Cent Rep 1987 (October / November): 15- 20.
44. Emanuel LL, Emanuel EJ. Decisions at the End of Life: Guided by Communities of Patients. Hastings Cent Rep 1993; 23(5):6-14.
45. Lindeman Nelson J & Lindeman Nelson H. Guided by Intimates. Hastings Cent Rep 1993; 23(5):14-5.
46. Drane JF, Coulehan JL. The Best - Interest Standard: Surrogate Decision Making and Quality of Life. J Clin Ethics 1995; 6(1): 20-9.
47. Engel GL. The Need for a New Medical Model: A Challenge for Biomedicine. Science 1977; 196:129-35.
48. Boletín Oficial del País Vasco. Decreto 270/2003, de 4 de noviembre, por el que se crea y regula el Registro vasco de voluntades anticipadas. BOPV del 28/11/2003.
49. Boletín Oficial de La Rioja. Ley 9/2005, de 30 de septiembre, reguladora del documento de instrucciones previas en el ámbito de la sanidad de La Rioja. BOR del 06/10/2005
50. Boletín Oficial del Estado. LEY 3/2005, de 8 de julio, de información sanitaria y autonomía del paciente de Extremadura. BOE del 05/08/2005.
51. Boletín Oficial de la Región de Murcia. Decreto 80/2005, de 8 de julio, por el que se aprueba el reglamento de instrucciones previas y su registro en la Región de Murcia. BORM del 19/07/2005.