The effect of message type on physician compliance with disease reporting requirements

Public Health Reports

Volumn 121, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 703-709

  Brissette, Ian ^a   Gelberg, Kitty H ^a   Grey, Anthony J ^a  

^a NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE TEST; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE REGISTRY; HUMAN; KRUSKAL WALLIS TEST; LEGAL ASPECT; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCUPATIONAL LUNG DISEASE; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; RANDOMIZATION; RANK SUM TEST; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; INFECTION CONTROL; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MOTIVATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STANDARD; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

COMMUNICATION; DISEASE NOTIFICATION; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; MOTIVATION; NEW YORK; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PUBLIC HEALTH;

EID: 33847011407     PISSN: 00333549     EISSN: 14682877     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/003335490612100610     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Azaroff LS, Levenstein C, Wegman DH. Occupational injury and illness surveillance: conceptual filters explain underreporting. Am J Public Health 2002;92:1421-9.
2. Pollack ES, Keimig DG. Counting injuries and illnesses in the workplace: proposals for a better system. Washington: National Academy Press; 1987.
3. Konowitz PM, Petrossian GA, Rose DN. The underreporting of disease and physicians' knowledge of reporting requirements. Public Health Rep 1984;99:31-5.
4. Marier R. The reporting of communicable diseases. Am J Epidemiol 1977;105:587-90.
5. Seixas NS, Rosenman KD. Voluntary reporting system for occupational disease: pilot project, evaluation. Public Health Rep 1986;101:278-82.
6. Cleere RL, Dougherty WJ, Fiumara NJ, Jenike C, Rose NJ. Physician attitudes toward venereal disease reporting. JAMA 1967;202:117-22.
7. Schaffner W, Scott HD, Rosenstein BJ, Byrne EB. Innovative communicable disease reporting. HSMHA Health Rep 1971;86:431-6.
8. Scott HD, Thacher-Renshaw A, Rosenbaum SE, Walters WJ Jr, Green M, Andrews LG, Faich GA. Physician reporting of adverse drug reactions. Results of the Rhode Island Adverse Reaction Reporting Project. JAMA 1990;263:1785-8.
9. Weiss BP, Strassburg MA, Fannin SL. Improving disease reporting in Los Angeles County: trial and results. Public Health Rep 1988;103:415-21.
10. Cunningham MR, Steinberg J, Grev R. Wanting to and having to help: separate motivations for positive mood and guilt induced helping. J Pers Soc Psychol 1980;38:181-92.
11. Bodenheimer T. The American health care system: physicians and the changing medical marketplace. N Engl J Med 1999;340:584-8.
12. Official Compilation of the Codes, Rules and Regulations of the State of New York, Title 10 (Health), Chapter I (State Sanitary Code), Part 22 (Environmental Diseases), Section 22.4 Reporting of Occupational Lung Diseases.
13. Updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems. MMWR Recomm Rep 2001;50(RR13):1-35.
14. Rothenberg R, Bross DC, Vernon TM. Reporting of gonorrhea by private physicians: a behavioral study. Am J Public Health 1980;70:946-7.
15. Mechanic D, McAlpine DD, Rosenthal M. Are patients office visits with physicians getting shorter? N Engl J Med 2001;344:198-204.
16. Schramm MM, Vogt RL, Mamolen M. The surveillance of communicable disease in Vermont: who reports? Public Health Rep 1991;106:95-7.
17. Atkin CK. Theory and principles of media health campaigns. In: Rice RE, Atkin CK, editors. Public communication campaigns. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2001.
18. Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50:1129-36.
19. Edwards W, editor. Utility theories: measurements and applications. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1992.
20. Clark MS. Record keeping in two types of relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol 1984;47:549-57.