Psychological support to defense counterintelligence operations

Military Psychology

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 283-296

  Shumate, Scott ^a   Borum, Randy ^b,c  

^a ARMED FORCES INSTITUTE OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847004042     PISSN: 08995605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327876mp1804_3     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. American Psychological Association. (2005). Report of the presidential task force on psychological ethics and national security. Washington, DC: Author.
2. Borum, R. (2004). Psychology of terrorism. Tampa: University of South Florida.
3. Borum, R. (2006). Approaching truth: Behavioral science lessons on educing information from human sources. In R. Fein (Ed.), Educing information: Science and art in interrogation - Foundations for the future (Intelligence Science Board Study on Educing Information Phase 1 report). Washington, DC: National Military Intelligence College Press.
4. Borum, R., Fein, R., Vossekuil, B., Gelles, M., & Shumate, S. (2004). The role of operational research in counterterrorism. International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, 17, 420-434.
5. Borum, R., & Gelles, M. (2005). The operational and organizational evolution of Al-Qaeda: A behavioral perspective. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23, 467-483.
6. Borum, R., Super, J., & Rand, M. (2003). Forensic assessment for high risk occupations. In A. Goldstein (Ed.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology: Vol. 11. Forensic psychology (pp. 133-148). New York: Wiley.
7. Crawford, K. S., & Bosshardt, M. J. (1993). Assessment of position factors that increase vulnerability to espionage. Monterey, CA: Defense Personnel Security Research Center.
8. Cronin, C. (Ed.). (1998). Military psychology: An introduction. Needham Heights, MA: Simon & Schuster.
9. DoD Directive 5105.67. (2002, February 19). Department of Defense Counterintelligence Field Activity (DoD CIFA). Washington, DC: Department of Defense.
10. Ewing, C., & Gelles, M. (2004). Ethical concerns in forensic consultation regarding national safety and security. Journal of Threat Assessment, 2, 95-107.
11. Executive Order 12333. (1981, December 4). United States Intelligence Activities, Section 3.4(a). EO provisions found in 46 FR 59941, 3 CFR, 1981 Comp., p. 200.
12. Fein, R. (Ed.). (2006). Educing information: Science and art in interrogation - Foundations for the future (Intelligence Science Board Study on Educing Information Phase 1 report). Washington, DC: National Military Intelligence College Press.
13. Gelles, M., Borum, R., & Palarea, R. (2005). Fundamentals of Jihadism: Behavioral considerations for developing and managing counterterrorism sources. Washington, DC: Naval Criminal Investigative Service.
14. Gelles, M., McFadden, R., Borum, R., & Vossekuil, B. (2006). An approach to the interrogation of subjects of al Qa'ida-related investigations: A perspective for law enforcement personnel. In T. Williamson (Ed.), Investigative interviewing: Developments in research, rights and regulation (pp. 23-41). Cullomtpon, England: Willan.
15. Gelles, M., Palarea, R., Arita, A., & Hawkes, C. (2005). Operational assessment in a changing world: A guide for special agents. Washington, DC: Naval Criminal Investigative Service.
16. Graham, J. (2002). What the U.S. military can do to defeat terrorism. Lincoln, NE: Writer's Club Press.
17. Herbig, K. L., & Wiskoff, M. F. (2002). Espionage against the United States by American citizens: 1947-2001. Monterey, CA: Defense Personnel Security Research Center.
18. Johnson, B. (1995). Perennial ethical quandaries in military psychology: Toward American Psychological Association-Department of Defense collaboration. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 281-287.
19. Johnson, B. (2002). Consulting in the military context: Implications of the revised training principles. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 54, 233-241.
20. Kipp, S. (2001). Espionage and the insider. San Francisco: SANS Institute.
21. Kramer, L., Heuer, R., & Crawford, K. (2005). Technological, social, and economic trends that are increasing U.S. vulnerability to insider espionage. Monterey, CA: Defense Personnel Security Research Center.
22. Lowenthal, M. (2003). Intelligence: From secrets to policy. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
23. Matsumoto, D. (Ed.). (2001). The handbook of culture and psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
24. National Security Agency. (2001). Espionage: The threat is real. Washington, DC: Author.
25. Office of the National Counterintelligence Executive. (2005). National Counterintelligence strategy of the United States. Washington, DC: Author.
26. Olson, J. (2001). The ten commandments of Counterintelligence. Studies on Intelligence, 11, 81-87.
27. Page, G. (1996). Clinical psychology in the military: Developments and issues. Clinical Psychology Review, 16, 383-396.
28. Saraswati, T. (Ed.). (2004). Cross-cultural perspectives in human development: Theory, research, and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Shaw, E. D., Ruby, K. G., & Post, J. M. (1998). The insider threat to information systems (Security Awareness Bulletin No. 2-98). Washington, DC: Department of Defense Security Institute.
30. Smith, E. (1990). The spies among us: Trends in military espionage. American Intelligence Journal, 11, 1-3.
31. Thompson, T. (2001). Security and motivational factors in espionage. American Intelligence Journal 20, 47-56.
32. Wettering, F. (2000). Counterintelligence: The broken triad. International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, 13, 265-300.