Values are a good thing in conservation biology

Conservation Biology

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 18-20

  Noss, Reed F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVOCACY; BIODIVERSITY; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; NATURE CONSERVATION; POLICY DEVELOPMENT; POLICY MAKING;

CONSUMER ADVOCACY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; ETHICS; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; METHODOLOGY; PERSONNEL; POLICY; SCIENCE; SHORT SURVEY; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

COMMUNICATION; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; CONSUMER ADVOCACY; PUBLIC POLICY; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; SCIENCE; SOCIAL VALUES;

EID: 33846997840     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00637.x     Document Type: Short Survey

References (9)

1. Chase, A. 1995. In a dark wood: the fight over forests and the rising tyranny of ecology. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
2. Lach, D., P. List, B. Steel, and B. Shindler. 2003. Advocacy and credibility of ecological scientists in resource decisionmaking: a regional study. BioScience 53:170-178.
3. Leopold, A. 1949. A Sand County almanac. Oxford University Press, New York.
4. Lovejoy, T. 1989. The obligations of a biologist. Conservation Biology 3:329-330.
5. Robertson, D. P., and R. B. Hull. 2001. Beyond biology: toward a more public ecology for conservation. Conservation Biology 15:970-979.
6. Shrader-Frechette, K. 1996. Throwing out the bathwater of positivism, keeping the baby of objectivity: relativism and advocacy in conservation biology. Conservation Biology 10:912-914.
7. Stern, P. C. 2005. Deliberative methods for understanding environmental systems. BioScience 55:976-982.
8. Wallington, T. J., and S. A. Moore. 2005. Ecology, values, and objectivity: advancing the debate. BioScience 55:873-878.
9. Wilson, E. O. 1994. Naturalist. Island Press, Washington, D.C.