Multiple Measures: Alternative Design and Analysis Models

Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 7-12

  Henderson Montero, Dianne ^a   Julian, Marc W ^b   Yen, Wendy M ^c  

^a Educational Testing Service   (United States)

^b Educational Testing Service   (United States)

^c Educational Testing Service   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Multiple measures; NCLB

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846991359     PISSN: 07311745     EISSN: 17453992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3992.2003.tb00122.x     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Ad Hoc Committee on Confirming Test Results. (2002, March 1). Using the National Assessment of Educational Progress to confirm state test results: a report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Confirming Test Results. Washington, DC: National Assessment Governing Board. Retrieved January 2, 2003, from http://nagb.org.
2. American Educational Research Association. (2000, July) AERA position statement concerning high-stakes testing in preK-12 education [electronic version]. Retrieved March 18, 2002, from http://www.aera.net/about/policy/stakes.htm.
3. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999) Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
4. Educational Testing Service. (2000) ETS standards for quality and fairness. Princeton, NJ: Author.
5. Fact Sheet on H.R. 1. Chairman John Boehner (2001, December 10.) Retrieved March 20, 2002, from House of Representatives website: http://edworkforce.house.gov/issues/107th/education/nclb/accountfact.htm.
6. Gong, B., &Hill, R. (2001, March) Some considerations of multiple measures in assessment and school accountability. Presentation at the Seminar on Using Multiple Measures and Indicators to Judge Schools' Adequate Yearly Progress under Title I (Sponsored by CCSSO & US DOE), Washington, DC.
7. Hambleton, R. K., Jaeger, R. M., Koretz, D., Linn, R. L., Millman, J., &Phillips, S. E. (1995) Review of the measurement quality of the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System, 1991–1994. Office of Educational Accountability, Kentucky General Assembly.
8. Heubert, J. P., &Hauser, R. M. (Eds.). (1999) High stakes: testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
9. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107–110, £115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
10. What's Proficient? (2002, February 20), Education Week.