Business communication in Belf

Business Communication Quarterly

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 55-59

  Kankaanranta, Anne ^a   Louhiala Salminen, Leena ^a  

^a HELSINKI SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846988565     PISSN: 10805699     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/108056990707000109     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. Barrett, D. J. (2006). Strong communication skills a must for today's leaders. Handbook of Business Strategy, 7, 385-390.
2. Campbell, C. P. (1998). Rhetorical ethos: A bridge between high-context and low-context cultures? In S. Niemeier, C. P. Campbell, & R. Dirven (Eds.), The cultural context in business communication (pp. 31-47). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
3. Kankaanranta, A. (2000). What makes the reader tick? Business professionals' reactions to first year business students' writing. In M. Charles & H. Kangasharju (Eds.), New orientations and developments: Business communication research and teaching working papers (pp. 153-179). Helsinki, Finland: Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration.
4. Kankaanranta, A. (2005). "Hej Seppo, could you pls comment on this!" - Internal email communication in lingua franca English in a multinational company. Retrieved October 2, 2006, from http://ebooks.jyu.fi/ solki/9513923207.pdf
5. Lesznyak, A. (2002). From chaos to the smallest common denominator: Topic management in English lingua franca communication. In K. Knapp & C. Meierkord (Eds.), Lingua franca communication (pp. 163-194). Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
6. Louhiala-Salminen, L. (2002). The fly's perspective: Discourse in the daily routine of a business manager. English for Specific Purposes, 21, 211-231.
7. Munter, M. (2006). Guide to managerial communication: Effective business writing and speaking. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8. Rogers, P. S., & Rymer, J. (2001). Analytical tools to facilitate transitions into new writing contexts: A communicative perspective. Journal of Business Communication, 28, 112-152.