High frequency immittance for neonates: A normative study

Acta Oto-Laryngologica

Volumn 127, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 49-56

  Swanepoel, De Wet ^a   Werner, Sonia ^a   Hugo, René ^a   Louw, Brenda ^a   Owen, Rina ^a   Swanepoel, André ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Acoustic reflex; High frequency probe tone; Immittance; Middle ear effusion; Middle ear fluid; Neonatal hearing screening; Static peak admittance; Tympanic peak pressure; Tympanometry

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC REFLEX; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FEMALE; GENDER; GROUPS BY AGE; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MIDDLE EAR; NEWBORN; NORMAL HUMAN; NORMAL VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCREENING TEST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TYMPANOMETRY;

ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE TESTS; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; NEONATAL SCREENING; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; REFERENCE VALUES; REFLEX, ACOUSTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33846987163     PISSN: 00016489     EISSN: 16512553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016480600740563     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Mencher GT, DeVoe SJ. Universal newborn screening: a dream realized or a nightmare in the making? Scand Audiol 2001;30(Suppl 53):15-21.
2. Thornton ARD, Kimm L, Kennedy CR, Cafarelli-Dees D. External- and middle-ear factors affecting evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates. Br J Audiol 1993;27:319-27.
3. Keefe DH, Zhao F, Neely ST, Gorga MP, Vohr BR. Earcanal acoustic admittance and reflectance effects in human neonates. I. Predictions of otoacoustic emission and auditory brainstem responses. J Acoust Soc Am 2003;113:389-406.
4. Engel J, Mahler E, Anteunis L, Marres E, Zielhuis G. Why are NICU infants at risk for chronic otitis media with effusion? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2001;57:137-44.
5. Boone RT, Bower CM, Martin PF. Failed newborn hearing screens as presentation for otitis media with effusion in the newborn population. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2005;69:393-7.
6. Hall JW III, Smith SD, Popelka GR. Newborn hearing screening with combined otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem responses. J Am Acad Audiol 2004;15:414-25.
7. Yeo SW, Park SN, Park YS, Suh BD. Effect of middle-ear effusion on otoacoustic emissions. J Laryngol Otol 2002;116:794-9.
8. Koivun P, Uhari M, Laitakari K, Alho OP, Luotonen J. Otoacoustic emissions and tympanometry in children with otitis media. Ear Hear 2000;21:212-7.
9. El-Refaie A, Parker DJ, Bamford JM. Otoacoustic emission versus ABR screening: the effect of external and middle ear abnormalities in a group of SCBU neonates. Br J Audiol 1996;30:3-8.
10. Taylor CL, Brooks RP. Screening for hearing loss and middle-ear disorders in children using TEOAEs. Am J Audiol 2000;9:50-5.
11. Holte L, Margolis RH, Cavanaugh R. Developmental changes in multifrequency tympanograms. Audiology 1991;30:1-24.
12. Hunter LL, Margolis RH. Multifrequency tympanometry: current clinical application. Am J Audiol 1992;1:33-43.
13. McKinley AM, Grose JH, Roush J. Multifrequency tympanometry and evoked acoustic emissions in neonates during the first 24 hours of life. J Am Acad Audiol 1997;8:218-23.
14. Meyer SE, Jardine CA, Deverson W. Developmental changes in tympanometry: a case study. Br J Audiol 1997;31:189-95.
15. Keefe DH, Levi E. Maturation of the middle and external ears: acoustic power-based responses and reflectance tympanometry. Ear Hear 1996;17:361-73.
16. Kei J, Allison-Levick J, Dockray J, Harrys R, Kirkegard C, Wong J, et al. High-frequency (1000 Hz) tympanometry in normal neonates. J Am Acad Audiol 2003;14:21-8.
17. Margolis RH, Bass-Ringdahl S, Hanks WD, Holte K, Zapala DA. Tympanometry in newborn infants - 1 KHz norms. J Am Acad Audiol 2003;14:383-92.
18. Purdy SC, Williams MJ. High frequency tympanometry: a valid and reliable immittance test protocol for young infants? New Zealand Audiological Society Bulletin 2000;10:9-24.
19. Olusanya BO, Luxon LM, Wirz SL. Benefits and challenges of newborn hearing screening for developing countries. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2004;68:287-305.
20. Van Cauwenberge PB, Vinck B, De Vel E, Dhooge I. Tympanometry and click evoked otoacoustic emissions in secretory otitis media: are C-EOAEs consistently absent in B-tympanograms? In: Lim DJ, Bluestone CD, Casselbrandt M, Klein JO, Ogra PL, editors. Recent advances in otitis media. Ontario: BC Decker; 1996. p. 139-41.
21. Sutton GJ, Gleadle P, Rowe SJ. Tympanometry and otoacoustic emissions in a cohort of special care neonates. Br J Audiol 1996;30:9-17.
22. Palmu A, Puhakka H, Rahko T, Takala AK. Diagnostic value of tympanometry in infants in clinical practice. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1999;49:207-13.
23. Owens JJ, McCoy MJ, Lonsbury-Martin BC, Martin GK. Influence of otitis media on evoked otoacoustic emissions in children. Semin Hear 1992;13:53-6.
24. Sprague BH, Wiley TL, Goldstein R. Tympanometric and acoustic-reflex studies in neonates. J Speech Hear Res 1985;28:265-72.
25. Wiley TL, Oviat DL, Block MG. Acoustic immittance measures in normal ears. J Speech Hear Res 1987;330:161-70.