Context sampling descriptive assessment: A pilot study of a further approach to functional assessment

Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 127-130

  Garbutt, Nathalie ^a,d   Furniss, Frederick ^b,c  

^a Leeds Older People's Psychology and Therapies Service   (United Kingdom)

^b Hesley Group   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^d Acad Unit of Psychiat/Behav Sci   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Context sampling descriptive assessment; Problem behaviour; Severe intellectual disabilities; Structured descriptive assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846971933     PISSN: 13602322     EISSN: 14683148     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2006.00317.x     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Anderson C. M. & Long E. S. (2002) Use of a structured descriptive assessment methodology to identify variables affecting problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 35, 137-154.
2. Freeman K. A., Anderson C. M. & Scotti J. R. (2000) A structured descriptive methodology: increasing agreement between descriptive and experimental analyses. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities 35, 55-66.
3. Hodge K., Hall S. & Oliver C. (2001) Distinguishing between Social Positive and Automatic Reinforcement in Descriptive Analyses of Problem Behaviour. Paper presented at the First International ABA Conference, Venice, Italy.
4. Lerman D. & Iwata B. A. (1993) Descriptive and experimental analyses of variables maintaining self-injurious behaviour. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 26, 293-319.
5. Vollmer T. R. & Smith R. G. (1996) Some current themes in functional analysis research. Research in Developmental Disabilities 17, 229-249.
6. Vollmer T. R., Borrero J. C., Wright C. S., Van Camp C. & Lalli J. S. (2001) Identifying possible contingencies during descriptive analyses of severe behavior disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 34, 269-287.