A neural network method for prediction of proteolytic cleavage sites in neuropeptide precursors

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology - Proceedings

Volumn 7 VOLS, Issue , 2005, Pages 2805-2808

  Feng, Liu ^a   Wets, Geert ^a  

^a HASSELT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACIDS; NEUROLOGY; PROBABILITY; PROTEINS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIGNAL FILTERING AND PREDICTION;

AMINO ACID RESIDUES; CLEAVAGE SITES; NEUROPEPTIDE PRECURSORS; PROTEOLYTIC PROCESSING;

NEURAL NETWORKS;

EID: 33846937635     PISSN: 05891019     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Rouille, Y., Duguay, S., Lund, K., Furuta, M., Gong, Q., Lipkind, G., Oliva, A., Chan, S., Steiner, D. Proteolytic processing mechanisms in the biosynthesis of neuroendocrine peptides: the subtilisin-like proprotein convertases. 1995.Front Neuroendocrinol. 16(4):322-61.
2. Elagoz, A., Benjannet, S., Mammarbassi, A., Wickham, L., Seidah, NG. Biosynthesis and cellular trafficking of the convertase SKI-1/S1P: ectodomain shedding requires SKI-1. 2002. J Biol Chem. 277(13):11265-75.
3. Nakagawa, T., Kim, W., Nagahama, M., Hosaka, M., Hatsuzawa, K., XKondoh-Hashiba,K.,Murakami,K. Consensus sequence for precursor processing at mono-arginyl sites. 1992. 267(23),16335-16340.
4. Rholam, M, Brakch, N, Germain, D, Thomas, D., Fahy, C., Boussetta, H., Boileau, G., Cohen, P. Role of amino acid sequences flanking dibasic cleavage sites in precursor proteolytic processing. The importance of the first residue C-terminal of the cleavage site. 1995. Eur J Biochem. 227(3):707-14.
5. Devi, L. Consensus sequence for processing of peptide precursors at monobasic sites. FEBS Letter. 1991, Mar 25;280(2): 189-94.
6. Duckert, P., Brunak, S., Blom, N. Prediction of proprotein convertase cleavage sites. Protein Engineering, Design and Selection, 2004, 17(1). 107-112.
7. Maloof, MA. Learning When Data Sets are unbalanced and When Costs are Unequal and Unknown. 2003. Workshop on Learning from Imbalanced Data Sets ∏.
8. Batista, G., Prati, R., Monard, M. A stuffy of the behaviour of several methods for balancing machine learning training data. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 2004, Volume 6 Issue 1
9. Tomek, I. Two Modifications of CNN. 1976. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Communications SMC-6. 769-772.
10. Wilson,D., Martinez,T. Reduction Techniques for Instance-Based Learning Algorithms. 2000, Machine Learning, 38, 257-286.
11. Chawla, N., Bowyer, K., Hall, L., Kegekmeyer, W. SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique. Journal of Artifical Intelligence, 2002, Research, 16, 321-357.
12. Silvert, W., Baptist, M. Can Neural Networks be used in Data-Poor Situations. Artificial Neuronal Networks; Application to Ecology and Evolution. 1998. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, p. 241-248.
13. Riedmiller, M., Braun, H. A Direct Adative Method for Faster Backpropagation Learning: The RPROP Algorithm. IEEE Intil. Conf. 1993.
14. Schneider, T., Stephens, R. Sequence Logos: A New Way to Display Consensus Sequences. 1990. Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 6097-6100.
15. Thomas, G. Furin at the cutting edge: from protein traffic to embryogenesis and disease. 2002. Mol Cell Biol. 3(10):753-66.
16. Cerstiaens, A., Baggerman, G., Vandingenen,A., Jonckheere H., Luyten, W. and Schoofs L. Mouse peptidomics. 2005, unpublished.