Comparison of objective and sensory skin irritations of several cosmetic preservatives

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 131-136

  Lee, Eunyoung ^a   An, Susun ^a   Choi, Dongwon ^a   Moon, Seongjoon ^a   Chang, Ihseop ^a  

^a AmorePacific Corporation   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Formulation type; Objective irritation; Preservatives; Sensory irritation

Indexed keywords

2 PHENOXYETHANOL; BUTYL PARABEN; CHLORPHENESIN; COSMETIC; ETHYL PARABEN; FRAGRANCE; METHYL PARABEN; PRESERVATIVE; PROPYL PARABEN;

ADULT; ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MINIMUM INHIBITORY CONCENTRATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PATCH TEST; SKIN IRRITATION; SKIN SENSATION; SKIN TEST; SKIN TOXICITY;

ADULT; ALLERGENS; CHEMISTRY, PHARMACEUTICAL; COSMETICS; DERMATITIS, IRRITANT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATCH TESTS; PRESERVATIVES, PHARMACEUTICAL;

EID: 33846923642     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: 16000536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01001.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Kligman A M. The invisible dermatoses. Arch Dermatol 1991: 127: 1375-1382.
2. Fisher A. Cosmetic actions and reactions: therapeutic, irritant and allergic. Cutis 1980: 26: 22-26.
3. Masashi F. Advanced research of skin sensory stimulation. Fragrance J 1995: 2: 75-84.
4. Lee E Y, An S S, Moon S J, Chang I S. The development of new and sensitive method of subjective irritation and the evaluation of preservatives. Presented at 2nd World Congress of the International Academy of Cosmetic Dermatology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
5. Masahi F, Yuri O, Hitoshi M. Skin sensory stimulation. J Soc Cosmet Chem Japan1989: 22: 229-236.
6. Elder R L. Final report on the safety assessment of methylparaben, ethylparaben, propylparaben and butylparaben. J Am Coll Toxicol 1984: 3: 147-209.
7. Fransway A F. Preservatives. In: Practical Contact Dermatitis. A Handbook for the Practitioner, Guin J D, (ed.): New York, NY, McGraw-Hill, 1995: 539-558.
8. Mary A L. Final report of the safety assessment of phenoxyethanol. J Am Coll Toxicol 1990: 9: 259-277.
9. Wallhausser K H. Antimicrobial preservatives used by the cosmetic industry. In: Cosmetics and Drug Preservation, Kabara J J (ed.): Marcel Dekker, 1984: 605-745.
10. Sasseville D. Hypersensitivity to preservatives. Dermatol Ther 2004: 17: 251-263.
11. Frosch P J, Kligman A M. A method for appraising the stinging capacity of topically applied substances. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1977: 28: 197-209.
12. Issachar N , Gall Y, Borell MT, Poelman MC. pH measurements during lactic acid stinging test in normal and sensitive skin. Contact Dermatitis 1997: 36: 152-155.
13. Basketter D A, Griffiths H A. A study of the relationship between susceptibility to skin stinging and skin irritation. Contact Dermatitis 1993: 29: 185-188.
14. Toshiro S, Hiromi Y, Hiroshi E. Pharmacological studies of stinging caused by parabens, 1990: 14: 9-16.
15. Ashikaga T, Kobayahi H, Okamoto M, Okamoto J, Hagaki H, Toyoda H. Improvement of the stinging test by using unwoven fabric for sample application and a categorical rating scale for scoring of sensory irritation. J Soc Cosmet Chem Japan 2003: 3: 136-141.
16. Christensen M, Kligman A M. An improved procedure for conducting lactic acid stinging tests on facial skin. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1996: 47: 1-11.