Quantity, controls and functions of large woody debris in Midwestern USA streams

River Research and Applications

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 21-33

  Cordova, Jean Miesbauer ^a,b   Rosi Marshall, E J ^a,c   Yamamuro, A M ^a,d   Lamberti, G A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^b Loyola University ^*  (United States)

^c LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

^d OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Channel shape; Forested streams; Geomorphic function; Large wood; Stream habitat

Indexed keywords

CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY; FLOW PATTERN; FLUVIAL LANDFORM; GEOMORPHOLOGY; STREAM; WATERSHED; WOODY DEBRIS;

EID: 33846921783     PISSN: 15351459     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rra.963     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Bain MB. 1999. Substrate. In Aquatic Habitat Assessment: Common Methods. Bain MB, Stev NJ (eds). American Fisheries Society: MD; 95-104.
2. Beechie TJ, Sibley TH. 1997. Relationships between channel characteristics, woody debris, and fish habitat in northwestern Washington streams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 126: 217-229.
3. Benke AC, Wallace JB. 1990. Woody dynamics in coastal plain blackwater streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 47: 92-99.
4. Benke AC, Henry RL, III, Gillespie DM, Hunter RJ. 1985. Importance of snag habitat for animal production in southeastern streams. Fisheries 10: 8-12.
5. Berg N, Carlson A, Azuma D. 1998. Function and dynamics of woody debris in stream reaches in the Central Sierra Nevada, California. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55: 1807-1820.
6. Beschta RL, Platts WS. 1986. Morphological features of small streams: significance and function. Water Resources Bulletin 22: 369-379.
7. Bilby RE, Bisson PA. 1998. Function and distribution of large woody debris. In River Ecology and Management: Lessons from the Pacific Coastal Region, Naiman RJ, Bilby RE (eds). Springer Verlag: New York; 324-346.
8. Bilby RE, Likens GE. 1980. Importance of organic debris dams in the structure and function of stream ecosystems. Ecology 61: 1107-1113.
9. Bilby RE, Ward JW. 1989. Changes in characteristics and function of woody debris with increasing size of streams in western Washington. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 118: 363-378.
10. Bilby RE, Ward JW. 1991. Characteristics and function of large woody debris in streams draining old-growth, clear-cut, and second-growth forests in southwestern Washington. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48: 2499-2508.
11. Brookshire ENJ, Dwire KA. 2003. Controls on patterns of coarse organic particle retention in headwater streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 22: 17-34.
12. Bryant MD. 1983. The role and management of woody debris in west coast Salmonid nursery streams. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 3: 322-330.
13. Connolly PJ, Hall JD. 1999. Biomass of coastal cutthroat trout in unlogged and previously clear-cut basins in the central Coast Range of Oregon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 5: 890-899.
14. Evans BF, Townsend CR, Crowl TA. 1993. Distribution and abundance of coarse woody debris in some southern New Zealand streams from contrasting forest catchments. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 27: 227-239.
15. Flebbe PA. 1999. Trout use of woody debris and habitat in Wine Spring Creek, North Carolina. Forest Ecology and Management 114: 367-376.
16. Gregory SV, Lamberti GA, Erman DC, Koski KV, Murphy ML, Sedell JR. 1987. Influence of forest practices on aquatic production. In Streamside Management: Forestry and Fishery Interactions, Salo EO, Cundy TW (eds). University of Washington: Seattle WA; 233-255.
17. Gurnell AM, Piegay H, Swanson FJ, Gregory SV. 2002. Large wood and fluvial processes. Freshwater Biology 47: 601-619.
18. Harmon ME, Franklin JF, Swanson FJ, Sollins P, Gregory SV, Lattin JD, Anderson NH, Cline SP, Aumen NG, Sedell JR, Lienkaemper GW, Cromack K, Jr, Cummins KW. 1986. Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Advances in Ecological Research 15: 133-302.
19. Hankin DG, Reeves GH. 1988. Estimating total fish abundance and total habitat area in small streams based on visual estimation methods. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 45: 834-844.
20. Hauer FR, Poole GC, Gangemi JT, Baxter CV. 1999. Large woody debris in bull trout (Salvelinusconfluentus) spawning streams of logged and wilderness watersheds in northwest Montana. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 56: 915-924.
21. Hilderbrand RH, Lemly AD, Dollof CA, Harpster KL. 1997. Effects of large woody debris placement on stream channels and benthic macroinvertebrates. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54: 931-939.
22. House R, Crispin V. 1990. Economic analyses of the value of large woody debris as salmonid habitat in coastal Oregon streams. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Technical Note T/N OR-7. January 1990.
23. Hubbs CL, Greeley JR, Tarzwell CM. 1932. Methods for the improvement of Michigan trout streams. Bulletin of the Institute for Fisheries Research No. 1.
24. Hyatt T, Naiman RJ. 2001. The residence time of large woody debris in the Queets River, Washington, USA. Ecological Applications 11: 191-202.
25. Johnson LB, Breneman DH, Richards C. 2003. Macroinvertebrate community structure and function associated with large wood in low gradient streams. River Research and Applications 19: 199-218.
26. Jones JB, Smock LA. 1991. Transport and retention of particulate organic matter in two low-gradient headwater streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 10: 115-126.
27. Keim RF, Skaugset AE, Bateman DS. 2002. Physical aquatic habitat II. Pools and cover affected by large woody debris in three Western Oregon streams. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22: 151-164.
28. Lamberti GA, Gregory SV. 1996. Transport and retention of CPOM. In Methods in Stream Ecology, Hauer FR, Lamberti GA (eds). Academic Press: San Diego, CA; 217-229.
29. Martin DJ. 2001. The influence of geomorphic factors and geographic region on large woody debris loading and fish habitat in Alaska coastal streams. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 21: 429-440.
30. Martin DJ, Benda LE. 2001. Patterns of instream wood recruitment and transport at the watershed scale. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 130: 940-958.
31. McHenry ML, Shott E, Conrad RH, Grette GB. 1998. Changes in the quantity and characteristics of large woody debris in streams of the Olympic Peninsula, Washington, U.S.A. (1982-1993). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55: 1395-1407.
32. O'Connor Environmental Inc. 2000. Garcia River large woody debris in stream monitoring. Accessed online December 19, 2002. http://www.fire.ca.gov/CDFBOFDB/pdfs/garcia_LWD_final.pdf>.
33. Ralph SC, Poole GC, Conquest LL, Naiman RJ. 1994. Stream channel morphology and woody debris in logged and unlogged basins of western Washington. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 51: 37-51.
34. Reeves GH, Everest RH, Sedell JR. 1993. Diversity of juvenile anadromous salmonid assemblages in coastal Oregon basins with different levels of timber harvest. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 122: 309-317.
35. Roni P, Quinn TP. 2001. Effects of wood placement on movements of trout and juvenile coho salmon in natural and artificial stream channels. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 130: 675-685.
36. Rosgen D. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology: Pagosa Springs, CO; 352.
37. Stevenson NJ, Mills KE. 1999. Streambank and shoreline condition. In Aquatic Habitat Assessment: Common Methods, Bain MB, Stevenson NJ (eds). American Fisheries Society: Bethesda, MD; 115-124.
38. Sullivan K, Lisle TE, Dolloff CA, Grant FE, Reid LM. 1987. Stream channels: the link between forests and fishes. In Streamside Management: Forestry and Fishery Interactions, Salo EO, Cundy TW (eds). UW-Seattle: Seattle, WA; 39-97.
39. Swanson FJ, Gregory SV, Sedell JR, Campbell AG. 1982. Land-water interactions: the riparian zone. In Analysis of Coniferous Forest Ecosystems in the Western United States, Edmonds RL (ed.). Hutchinson Ross Publishing Co.: Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania; 267-291.
40. Thornton KW, Holbrook SP, Stolte KL, Landy RB. 2000. Effects of forest management practices on Mid-Atlantic streams. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 63: 31-41.
41. Triska FJ. 1984. Role of wood debris in modifying channel geomorphology and riparian areas of a large lowland river under pristine conditions: a historical case study. Internationale Vereinigung fur Theorerische und Angewandte Limnologie 22: 1876-1892.
42. Wallace JB, Benke AC. 1984. Quantification of woody habitat in subtropical coastal plain streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 41: 1643-1652.
43. Webster JR, Covich AP, Tank JL, Crockett TV. 1994. Retention of coarse organic particles in streams in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 13: 140-150.
44. Wing MG, Skaugset A. 2002. Relationships of channel characteristics, land ownership, and land use patterns to large woody debris in western Oregon streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59: 796-807.
45. Young KA, Hinch SG, Northcote TG. 1999. Status of resident coastal cutthroat trout and their habitat twenty-five years after riparian logging. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 19: 901-911.