Laparoscopic augmentation cystoplasty: A comparison between native ileum and small intestinal submucosa in the porcine model

BJU International

Volumn 99, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 628-631

  Wang, David S ^a,c   Anderson, David A ^b   Fretz, Peter C ^b   Nguyen, Thai T ^b   Winfield, Howard N ^b  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HOSPITALS AND CLINICS   (United States)

^c BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Augmentation; Cystoplasty; Laparoscopy; SIS

Indexed keywords

ALLOGRAFT; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ANESTHESIA; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ASCITES; BLADDER CAPACITY; BLADDER RECONSTRUCTION; CYSTOMETRY; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; ILEUM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE TRANSPLANTATION; LAPAROSCOPIC AUGMENTATION CYSTOPLASTY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; NONHUMAN; OPERATION DURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SMALL INTESTINE MUCOSA; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SWINE;

ANIMALS; CYSTECTOMY; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; INTESTINAL MUCOSA; LAPAROSCOPY; MODELS, ANIMAL; SWINE; URINARY BLADDER; URINARY BLADDER DISEASES; URINARY DIVERSION;

EID: 33846912050     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06662.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. McDougal WS. Metabolic complications of urinary intestinal diversion. J Urol 1992; 147: 1199-208
2. Nurse DE, Mundy AR. Assessment of the malignant potential of cystoplasty. Br J Urol 1989; 64: 489-92
3. Nurse DE, McInerney PD, Thomas PJ, Mundy AR. Stones in enterocystoplasties. Br J Urol 1996; 77: 684-7
4. Duel BP, Gonzalez R, Barthold JS. Alternative techniques for augmentation cystoplasty. J Urol 1998; 159: 998-1005
5. Barrett DM, Donovan MG. Prosthetic bladder augmentation and replacement. Semin Urol 1984; 2: 167-75
6. Fishman IJ, Flores FN, Scott FB, Spjut HJ, Morrow B. Use of fresh placental membrane for bladder reconstruction. J Urol 1987; 138: 1291-4
7. Prasad B, Tyagi RP. Experimental cystoplasty in dogs using formalin preserved buffalo dura mater. Zentralbl Veterinarmed A 1980; 27: 479-84
8. Kambic H, Kay R, Chen JF, Matsushita M, Harasaki H, Zilber S. Biodegradable pericardial implants for bladder augmentation: a 2.5-year study in dogs. J Urol 1992; 148: 539-43
9. Calvano CJ, Moran ME, Parekh A, Desai PJ, Cisek LJ. Laparoscopic augmentation cystoplasty using the novel biomaterial Surgisis: small-intestinal submucosa. J Endourol 2000; 14: 213-7
10. Badylak SF, Kropp B, McPherson T, Liang H, Snyder PW. Small intestinal submucosa: a rapidly resorbed bioscaffold for augmentation cystoplasty in a dog model. Tissue Eng 1998; 4: 379-87
11. Knapp PM, Lingeman JE, Sigel YI, Badylak SF, Demeter RJ. Biocompatibility of small-intestinal submucosa in urinary tract as augmentation cystoplasty graft and injectable suspension. J Endourol 1994; 8: 125-30
12. Kropp BP, Eppley BL, Prevel CD et al. Experimental assessment of small intestinal submucosa as a bladder wall substitute. Urology 1995; 46: 396-400
13. Elliott SP, Meng MV, Anwar HP, Stoller ML. Complete laparoscopic ileal cystoplasty. Urology 2002; 59: 939-43
14. Rackley RR, Abdelmalak JB. Laparoscopic augmentation cystoplasty. Surgical technique. Urol Clin North Am 2001; 28: 663-70
15. Portis AJ, Elbahnasy AM, Shalhav AL et al. Laparoscopic augmentation cystoplasty with biodegradable grafts in an animal model. J Urol 2000; 164: 1405-11
16. Gill IS, Rackley RR, Meraney AM, Marcello PW, Sung GT. Laparoscopic enterocystoplasty. Urology 2000; 55: 178-81
17. Paterson RF, Lifshitz DA, Beck SD et al. Multilayered small intestinal submucosa is inferior to autologous bowel for laparoscopic bladder augmentation. J Urol 2002; 168: 2253-7