CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING SYSTEMS FOR STUDENT ASSESSMENT

Studies in Educational Evaluation

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 15-28

  Harlen, Wynne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846904814     PISSN: 0191491X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2007.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. ARG (2004). Testing, motivation and learning. Available from the CPA Office, Institute of Education, University of London and from the ARG website: www.assessment-reform-group.org.
2. ARG (2006). The role of teachers in the assessment of learning. Available from the CPA Office, Institute of Education, University of London and from the ARG website: www.assessment-reform-group.org.
3. ASF (2006). Assessment systems for the future project: Working paper 3. Available on the ARG web site: www.assessment-reform-group.org.
4. Black, P. (2006). Turning purpose into practice in science education. In Wood-Robinson, V. (Ed.), ASE Guide to Secondary Science Education. Hatfield: Association for Science Education.
5. Black, P., Harrison, C, Lee, C, Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning, putting it into practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
6. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2006). The reliability of assessments. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning. London: Sage.
7. DES/WO (1988). Task group on assessment and testing: A report. London: Department of Education and Science and Welsh Office.
8. Dweck, C.S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
9. Gipps, C.V. (1994). Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment. London: Falmer.
10. Harlen, W. (2006). On the relationship between assessment for formative and summative purposes. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 103-118). London: Sage.
11. Harlen, W. (2005). Trusting teachers'judgments: Research evidence of the reliability and validity of teachers' assessment for summative purposes. Research Papers in Education, 20 (3), 245-270.
12. Harlen W., and Deakin Crick R. Testing and motivation for learning. Assessment in Education 10 2 (2003) 169-208
13. Hoge R.D., and Butcher R. Analysis of teacher judgements of pupil achievement levels. Journal of Educational Psychology 76 5 (1984) 777-781
14. Koretz D. Large-scale portfolio assessment in the US: Evidence pertaining to the quality of measurement. Assessment in Education 5 3 (1998) 309-334
15. Lewy, A., & Nevo, D. (Eds.) (1981). Evaluation roles in education. London: Gordon and Breach.
16. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed.). American Council on Education. Washington: Macmillan.
17. Pedulla, J.J., Abrams, L.M., Madaus, G.F., Russell, M.K., Ramos, M.A., & Miao, J. (2003). Perceived effects of state-mandated testing programs on teaching and learning: Findings from a national survey of teachers. Boston College: National Board on Educational Testing and Public Policy.
18. Pollard, A., Triggs, P., Broadfoot, P., McNess, E., & Osborn, M. (2000). What pupils say: Changing policy and practice in primary education. London: Continuum.
19. Reay D., and Wiliam D. "I'll be a nothing": Structure, agency and the construction of identity through assessment. British Educational Research Journal 25 (1999) 343-354
20. Rowe K.J., and Hill P.W. Assessing, recording and reporting students' educational progress: The case for "subject profiles". Assessment in Education 3 (1996) 309-352
21. Smith E., and Gorard S. "They don't give us our marks": The role of formative feedback in student progress. Assessment in Education 12 1 (2005) 21-38
22. Wiliam D. Reliability, validity, and all that jazz. Education 3-13 29 3 (2001) 17-21
23. Wood, R. (1991) Assessment and testing: A survey of research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.