Muscimol inactivation of the septo-preoptic complex affects medial forebrain bundle self-stimulation only when directed at the complex's ventrolateral components

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 178, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 98-107

  Waraczynski, Meg ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN WHITEWATER   (United States)

Author keywords

Basal forebrain; Medial forebrain bundle; Rate frequency curve; Reward; Self stimulation

Indexed keywords

4 AMINOBUTYRIC ACID RECEPTOR STIMULATING AGENT; MUSCIMOL; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGONAL BAND OF BROCA; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG RESPONSE; FOREBRAIN; HEMISPHERE; INVALIDITY; MAGNOCELLULAR NUCLEUS; MALE; MEDIAL FOREBRAIN BUNDLE; MENTAL CAPACITY; NONHUMAN; PREOPTIC AREA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; REWARD; SELF STIMULATION; SEPTUM PELLUCIDUM; THALAMUS VENTRAL NUCLEUS;

ANIMALS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; GABA AGONISTS; MALE; MEDIAL FOREBRAIN BUNDLE; MICROINJECTIONS; MUSCIMOL; NEURAL PATHWAYS; PREOPTIC AREA; RATS; RATS, LONG-EVANS; RECEPTORS, GABA-A; SELF STIMULATION; SEPTUM OF BRAIN; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 33846898527     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.12.005     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alheid G.F., and Heimer L. New perspectives in basal forebrain organization of special relevance for neuropsychiatric disorders: the striatopallidal, amygdaloid, and corticopetal components of substantia innominata. Neuroscience 27 (1988) 1-39
2. Alheid G.F., and Heimer L. Theories of basal forebrain organization and the 'emotional motor system'. Prog Brain Res 107 (1996) 461-484
3. Arvanitogiannis A., Flores C., Pfaus J.G., and Shizgal P. Increased ipsilateral expression of Fos following lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation. Brain Res 720 (1996) 148-154
4. Arvanitogiannis A., Flores C., and Shizgal P. Fos-like immunoreactivity in the caudal diencephalon and brainstem following lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation. Behav Brain Res 88 (1997) 275-279
5. Bielajew C. Distribution of cytochrome oxidase in response to rewarding brain stimulation: effect of different pulse durations. Brain Res Bull 26 (1991) 379-384
6. Bushnik T., Bielajew C., and Konkle A.T. The substrate for brain-stimulation reward in the lateral preoptic area. I. Anatomical mapping of its boundaries. Brain Res 881 2 (2000) 103-111
7. Esposito R.U., Porrino L.J., Seeger T.F., Crane A.M., Everist H.D., and Pert A. Changes in local cerebral glucose utilization during rewarding brain stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81 2 (1984) 635-639
8. Flores C., Arvanitogiannis A., and Shizgal P. Fos-like immunoreactivity in forebrain regions following self-stimulation of the lateral hypothalamus and the ventral tegmental area. Behav Brain Res 87 (1997) 239-251
9. Gallistel C.R., Gomita Y., Yadin E., and Campbell K.A. Forebrain origins and terminations of the medial forebrain bundle metabolically activated by rewarding stimulation or by reward-blocking doses of pimozide. J Neurosci 5 (1985) 1246-1261
10. Gallistel C.R., and Leon M. Measuring the subjective magnitude of brain stimulation reward by titration with rate of reward. Behav Neurosci 105 (1991) 913-925
11. Gastard M., Jensen S.L., Martin J.R., Williams E.A., and Zahm D.S. The caudal sublenticular region/anterior amygdaloid area is the only part of the rat forebrain and mesopontine tegmentum occupied by magnocellular cholinergic neurons that receives output from the central division of extended amygdala. Brain Res 957 (2002) 207-222
12. Geisler S., and Zahm D.S. On the retention of neurotensin in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) despite destruction of the main neurotensinergic afferents of the VTA-implications for the organization of forebrain projections to the VTA. Brain Res 1087 (2006) 87-104
13. Hunt G.E., and McGregor I.S. Rewarding brain stimulation induces only sparse Fos-like immunoreactivity in dopaminergic neurons. Neuroscience 83 (1998) 501-515
14. Kornetsky C., Huston-Lyons D., and Porrino L.J. The role of the olfactory tubercle in the effects of cocaine, morphine, and brain-stimulation reward. Brain Res 541 (1991) 75-81
15. Martin J.H. Autoradiographic estimation of the extent of reversible inactivation produced by microinjection of lidocaine and muscimol in the rat. Neurosci Lett 127 (1991) 160-164
16. Murray B., and Shizgal P. Physiological measures of conduction velocity and refractory period for putative reward-relevant MFB axons arising in the rostral MFB. Physiol Behav 59 (1996) 427-437
17. Nakahara D., Ishida Y., Nakamura M., Kuwahara I., Todaka K., and Nishimori T. Regional differences in desensitization of c-Fos expression following repeated self-stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle in the rat. Neuroscience 90 (1999) 1013-1020
18. Paxinos G., and Watson C. The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. 4th ed. (1998), Academic Press, San Diego
19. Porrino L.J., Esposito R.U., Seeger T.F., Crane A.M., Pert A., and Sokoloff L. Metabolic mapping of the brain during rewarding self-stimulation. Science 224 (1984) 306-309
20. Prado-Alcala R., Streather A., and Wise R.A. Brain stimulation reward and dopamine terminal fields. II. Septal and cortical projections. Brain Res 301 (1984) 209-219
21. Rompre P.P. Psychostimulant-like effects of central microinjection of neurotensin on brain stimulation reward. Peptides 16 (1995) 1417-1420
22. Rompre P.P., Bauco P., and Gratton A. Facilitation of brain stimulation reward by mesencephalic injections of neurotensin-(1-13). Eur J Pharmacol 211 (1992) 295-303
23. Rompre P.P., and Boye S.M. Opposite effects of mesencephalic microinjections of cholecystokinin octapeptides and neurotensin-(1-13) on brain stimulation reward. Eur J Pharmacol 232 (1993) 299-303
24. Rompre P.P., and Gratton A. Mesencephalic microinjections of neurotensin-(1-13) and its C-terminal fragment, neurotensin-(8-13), potentiate brain stimulation reward. Brain Res 616 (1993) 154-162
25. Shizgal P., Schindler D., and Rompre P.P. Forebrain neurons driven by rewarding stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle in the rat: comparison of psychophysical and electrophysiological estimates of refractory periods. Brain Res 499 (1989) 234-248
26. Sonnenschein B., Conover K., and Shizgal P. Growth of brain stimulation reward as a function of duration and stimulation strength. Behav Neurosci 117 (2002) 978-994
27. Waraczynski M. Basal forebrain knife cuts and medial forebrain bundle self-stimulation. Brain Res 438 (1988) 8-22
28. Waraczynski M. Lidocaine inactivation demonstrates a stronger role for central versus medial extended amygdala in medial forebrain bundle self-stimulation. Brain Res 962 (2003) 180-198
29. Waraczynski M. The central extended amygdala network as a proposed circuit underlying reward valuation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 30 (2006) 472-496
30. Waraczynski M., and Demco C. Lidocaine inactivation of the ventral pallidum affects responding for brain stimulation reward more than it affects the stimulation's reward value. Behav Brain Res 173 (2006) 288-298
31. Yadin E., Guarini V., and Gallistel C.R. Unilaterally activated systems in rats self-stimulating at sites in the medial forebrain bundle, medial prefrontal cortex, or locus coeruleus. Brain Res 266 (1983) 39-50
32. Zaborszky L., Pang K., Somogyi J., Nadasdy Z., and Kallo I. The basal forebrain corticopetal system revisited. Ann NY Acad Sci 877 (1999) 339-367
33. Zahm D.S. The evolving theory of basal forebrain functional-anatomical 'macrosystems'. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 30 (2006) 148-172
34. Zahm D.S., Grosu S., Williams E.A., Qin S., and Berod A. Neurons of origin of the neurotensinergic plexus enmeshing the ventral tegmental area in rat: retrograde labeling and in situ hybridization combined. Neuroscience 104 (2001) 841-851