Rule extraction for glaucoma detection with summary data from stratusOCT

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 244-250

  Huang, Mei Ling ^a   Chen, Hsin Yi ^b   Lin, Jian Cheng ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHIN YI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^b CHINA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHINESE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DEVICE; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPTIC NERVE; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; TAIWAN; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; ASIAN; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DECISION TREE; ETHNOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBER; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; RETINA GANGLION CELL; STANDARD; VISUAL DISORDER; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

ADULT; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DECISION TREES; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBERS; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; TAIWAN; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 33846896731     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.06-0320     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Quigley HA, Addicks EM, Green RW. Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. III. Quantitative correlation of nerve fiber loss and visual field defect in glaucoma, ischemic neuropathy, papilledema, and toxic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982;100:135-146.
2. Sommer A, Katz J, Quigley HA, et al. Clinically detectable nerve fiber layer atrophy precedes the onset of glaucomatous field loss. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:77-83.
3. Greany MJ, Hoffman DC, Garway-Heath DF, et al. Comparisons of optic nerve imaging methods to distinguish normal eyes from those with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:140-145.
4. Sanchez-Galeana C, Bowd C, Blumenthal EZ, et al. Using optical imaging summary data to detect glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2001; 108:1812-1818.
5. Uchida H, Brigatti L, Caprioli J. Detection of structural damage from glaucoma with confocal laser image analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:2393-2401.
6. Wollstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1557-1563.
7. Choplin NT, Lundy DC, Dreher AW. Differentiating patients with glaucoma from glaucoma suspects and normal subjects by nerve fiber layer assessment with scanning laser polarimetry. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:2068-2076.
8. Hoh ST, Greenfield DS, Mistlberger A, et al. Optical coherence tomography and scanning laser polarimetry in normal, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129: 129-135.
9. Cioffi GA, Robin AL, Eastman RD, et al. Confocal laser scanning ophthalmoscope: reproducibility of optic nerve head topographic measurements with the confocal laser scanning ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology. 1993;100:57-62.
10. Zangwill L, Shakiba S, Caprioli J, et al. Agreement between clinicians and a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope in estimating cup/disk ratios. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;119:415-421.
11. Weinreb RN, Shakiba S, Sample PA, et al. Association between quantitative nerve fiber layer measurement and visual field loss in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;120:732-738.
12. Schuman JS, Hee MR, Puliafito CA, et al. Quantification of nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous eyes using optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:586-596.
13. Hoh ST, Ishikawa H, Greenfield DS, et al. Peripapillary nerve fiber layer thickness measurement reproducibility using scanning laser polarimetry. J Glaucoma. 1998;7:712-715.
14. Horn FK, Jonas JB, Martus P, et al. Polarimetric measurement of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in glaucoma diagnosis. J Glaucoma. 1999;8:353-362.
15. Chen HY, Hung PT, Hung TJ. Optical coherence tomography study on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in open angle glaucoma (abstract). Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139(suppl):S53.
16. Hee MR, Izatt JA, Swanson EA, et al. Optical coherence tomography of the human retina. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:325-332.
17. Schuman JS, Hee MR, Arya AV, et al. Optical coherence tomography: a new tool for glaucoma diagnosis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1995;6:89-95.
18. Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science. 1991;254:1178-1181.
19. Gurses-Ozden R, Teng C, Vessani R, et al. Macular and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurement reproducibility using optical coherence tomography (OCT-3). J Glaucoma. 2004;13:238-244.
20. Paunescu LA, Schuman JS, Price LL, et al. Reproducibility of nerve fiber thickness, macular thickness, and optic nerve head measurements using StratusOCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45: 1716-1724.
21. Kononenko I. Machine learning for medical diagnosis: history, state of the art and perspective. Artif Intell Med. 2001;23:89-109.
22. Wetter T. Lessons learnt from bringing knowledge-based decision support into routine use (editorial). Artif Intell Med. 2002;24:195-203.
23. Burgansky-Eliash Z, Wollstein G, Chu T, et al. Optical coherence tomography machine learning classifiers for glaucoma detection: a preliminary study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:4147-4152.
24. Huang ML, Chen HY. Development and comparison of automated classifiers for glaucoma diagnosis using Stratus optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:4121-4129.
25. Manassakorn A, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Caprioli J. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic disk algorithms with optical coherence tomography to detect glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:105-115.
26. Caprioli J, Park HJ, Ugurlu S, et al. Slope of the peripapillary nerve fiber layer surface in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998; 39:2321-2328.
27. Lee RCT, Slagle JR, Blum H. A Triangulation method for the sequential mapping of points from N-space to two-space. IEEE Trans Comp. 1977;26:288-292.
28. Pykett CE. Improving the efficiency of Sammon's nonlinear mapping by using clustering archetypes. Electron Lett. 1978;14:799-800.
29. Kohonen T. Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biol Cybern. 1982;43:59-69.
30. Somervuo P, Kohonen T. Self-organizing maps ad learning vector quantization for feature sequences. Neur Process Lett. 1999;10: 151-159.
31. Tokutaka H, Yoshihara K, Fujimura K et al. Application of self-organizing maps (som) to auger electron spectroscopy (aes). Surf Interface Anal. 1999;27:783-788.
32. Oja E, Kaski S, eds. Kohonen Maps. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V.; 2003.
33. Andreas R. Automatic Labeling of Self-Organizing Maps: Making a Treasure- Map Reveal its Secrets. Proceedings of the 3rd Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PA-KDD '99) Bejing, China: 1999, April, 26-28.
34. Chen HY, Huang ML. Discrimination between normal and glaucomatous eyes using Stratus optical coherence tomography in Taiwan Chinese subjects. Graefe Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005; 243:894-902.
35. Wollsten G, Ishikawa H, Wang J, et al. Comparison of three optical coherence tomography scanning areas for detection of glaucomatous damage. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:39-43.
36. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, et al. Influence of disease severity and optic disc size on the diagnostic performance of imaging instruments in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:1008-1015.
37. Leung CK, Chan WM, Yung WH. Comparison of macular and peripapillary measurements for the detection of glaucoma: an optical coherence tomography study. Ophthalmology. 2005;112: 391-400.
38. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, et al. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements for glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:44-55.
39. Goldbaum MH, Sample PA, Chan K, et al. Comparing machine learning classifiers for diagnosing glaucoma from standard automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:162-169.
40. Sample PA, Goldbam MH, Chan K, et al. Using machine learning classifiers to identify glaucomatous change earlier in standard visual fields. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:2660-2665.
41. Sample PA, Chan K, Boden C, et al. Using unsupervised learning with variational bayesian mixture of factor analysis to identify patterns of glaucomatous visual field defects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:2596-2605.
42. Zangwill LM, Chan K, Bowd C, et al. Heidelberg retina tomograph measurements of the optic disc and parapapillary retina for detecting glaucoma analyzed by machine learning classifiers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:3144-3151.
43. Bowd C, Medeiros FA, Zhang Z, et al. Relevance vector machine and support vector machine classifier analysis of scanning laser polarimetry retinal nerve fiber layer measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:1322-1329.
44. Yan S, Abidi SS, Artes PH. Analyzing sub-classification of glaucoma via SOM based clustering of optic nerve images. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2005;116:483-488.
45. Tielsch JM, Katz J, Quigley HA, et al. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement in measurements of optic disc characteristics. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:350-356.
46. Arnalich-Montiel F, Munoz-Negrete FJ, Rebolleda G, et al. Cup-to-disc ratio: agreement between slit-lamp indirect ophthalmoscopic estimation and stratus optical coherence tomography measurement. Eye. Published online May 5, 2006.
47. Arthur SN, Aldridge AJ, De Leon-Ortega J, et al. Agreement in assessing cup-to-disc ratio measurement among stereoscopic optic nerve head photographs, HRT II, and StratusOCT. J Glaucoma. 2006;15:183-189.
48. Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Sources of bias in studies of optic disc and retinal nerve fiber morphology. Br J Ophthalmol. 1988; 82:986.
49. Bourne PR, Medeiros FA, Bowd C, et al. Comparability of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements of optical coherence tomography instruments. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46: 1280-1285.