Spelling consistency affects reading in young dutch readers with and without dyslexia

Annals of Dyslexia

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 271-300

  Bosman, Anna M T ^a   Vonk, Wietske ^b   Van Zwam, Margriet ^b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Dyslexia; Reading; Resonance models; Spelling; Spelling consistency; Visual word perception

Indexed keywords

CHILD; DYSLEXIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NETHERLANDS; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REACTION TIME; READING; REVIEW; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

CHILD; DYSLEXIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NETHERLANDS; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; READING; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 33846892964     PISSN: 07369387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11881-006-0012-4     Document Type: Review

References (79)

1. Andrews, S. (1982). Phonological receding: Is the regularity effect consistent? Memory & Cognition, 10, 565-575.
2. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
3. Backman, J., Bruck, M., Hebert, M., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1984). Acquisition and use of spelling-sound information in reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 114-133.
4. Backman, J. E., Mamen, M., & Ferguson, H. B. (1984). Reading level design: Conceptual and methodological issues in reading research. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 560-568.
5. Barry, C., & Seymour, P. H. K. (1988). Lexical priming and sound-to- spelling contingency effects in nonword spelling. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 5-40.
6. Bosman, A. M. T., & de Groot, A. M. B. (1991). De ontwikkeling van woordbeelden bij beginnende lezers en spellers [The development of orthographic images of beginning readers and spellers]. Pedagogische Studien, 68, 199-215.
7. Bosman, A. M. T., & de Groot, A. M. B. (1996). Phonologic mediation is fundamental to reading: Evidence from beginning readers. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 715-744.
8. Bosman, A. M. T., & Mekking, A. J. (2006). Statistical analysis of the bidirectional inconsistencies of spelling and sound in Dutch. Manuscript in preparation.
9. Bosman, A. M. T., van Leerdam, M., & de Gelder, B. (2000). The /O/ in OVER is different from the /O/ in OTTER: Phonological effects in Dutch students with and without dyslexia. Developmental Psychology, 36, 817-825.
10. Bosman, A. M. T., & Van Orden, G. C. (1997). Why spelling is more difficult than reading. In C. A. Perfetti, L. Rieben, & M. Fayol, (Eds.), Learning to spell (pp. 173-194). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Brus, B. T., & Voeten, M. J. M. (1973). Een-minuut test [One-minute test]. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Berkhout.
12. Brysbaert, M. (1996). Word frequency affects naming latency in Dutch with age of acquisition controlled. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 8, 185-193.
13. Clark, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335-359.
14. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
15. Davies, R. A. I., & Weekes, B. S. (2005). Effects of feedforward and feedback consistency on reading and spelling in dyslexia. Dyslexia, 11, 233-252.
16. de Groot, A. M. B. (1989). Representational aspects of word imageability and word frequency as assessed through word association. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 824-845.
17. del Prado Martín, F. M., Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Schreuder, R., de Jong, N. H., & Baayen, R. H. (2005). Changing places: A cross-language perspective on frequency and family size in Dutch and Hebrew. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 496-512.
18. Farrar, W. T., & Van Orden, G. C. (2001). Errors as multistable response options. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 5, 223-265.
19. Frost, R. (1998). Towards a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 71-99.
20. Galaburda, A. M., Sherman, G. F., Rosen, G. D., Aboitiz, F., & Geschwind, N. (1985). Developmental dyslexia: Four consecutive patients with cortical anomalies. Annals of Neurology, 18, 222-233.
21. Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 674-691.
22. Goswami, U., Ziegler, J. C., Dalton, L., & Schneider, W. (2003). Nonword reading across orthographies: How flexible is the choice of reading units? Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 235-247.
23. Griffiths, Y. M., & Snowling, M. J. (2002). Predictors of exception word and nonword reading in dyslexic children: The severity hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 34-43.
24. Grossberg, S., & Stone, G. O. (1986). Neural dynamics of word recognition and recall: Attentional priming, learning, and resonance. Psychological Review, 93, 46-74.
25. Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106, 491-528.
26. Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). Are there orthographic impairments in phonological dyslexia? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 71-92.
27. Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111, 662-720.
28. Holligan, C., & Johnston, R. S. (1988). The use of phonological information by good and poor readers in memory and reading tasks. Memory & Cognition, 16, 522-532.
29. Holmes, V. M., & Ng, E. (1993). Word-specific knowledge, word-recognition strategies, and spelling ability. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 230-257.
30. Jared, D. (1997). Spelling-sound consistency affects the naming of high-frequency words. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 505-529.
31. Jared, D. (2002). Spelling-sound consistency and regularity effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 723-750.
32. Jared, D., McRae, K., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). The basis of consistency effect in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 687-715.
33. Kawamoto, A. H., & Zemblidge, J. (1992). Pronunciation of homographs. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 349-374.
34. Kreiner, D. S., & Gough, P. B. (1990). Two ideas about spelling: Rules and word-specific memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 103-118.
35. Lacruz, I., & Folk, J. R. (2004). Feedforward and feedback consistency effects for high-nd low-frequency words in lexical decision and naming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 1261-1284.
36. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
37. Metsala, J. L., Stanovich, K. E., & Brown, G. D. A. (1998). Regularity effects and the phonological deficit model of reading disabilities: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 279-293.
38. Monsell, S. (1991). The nature and locus of word frequency effects in reading. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading. Visual word recognition (pp. 148-197). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Pecher, D. (2001). Perception is a two-way junction: Feedback semantics in word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 545-551.
40. Peereman, R., Content, A., & Bonin, P. (1998). Is perception a two-way street? The case of feedback consistency in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 151-174.
41. Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Coltheart, M. (2002). How predictable is spelling? Developing and testing metrics of phoneme-grapheme contingency. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 897-915.
42. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. E. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular designs. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
43. Plaut, D. C., & Shallice, T. (1993). Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 377-500.
44. Pugh, K., Rexer, K., & Katz, L. (1994). Evidence for flexible coding in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 807-825.
45. Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (2003). A further look at the "Language-as- fixed-effect fallacy". Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57(3), 141-151.
46. Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Schrijnemakers, J. M. C., & Gremmen, F. (1999). How to deal with "The langauge-as-fixed-effect fallacy": Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 416-426.
47. Rack, J. P., Snowling, M. J., & Olson, R. K. (1992). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 28-53.
48. Reitsma, P., & Vinke, J. (1986). Individuele verschillen in direct en indirect lezen [Individual differences in direct and indirect reading]. In P. Reitsma, A. G. Bus, & W. H. J. van Bon (Eds.), Leren lezen en spellen: Ontwikkeling en problemen (pp. 80-85). Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
49. Rodd, J., Gaskell, G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2002). Making sense of semantic ambiguity: Semantic competition in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 245-266.
50. Rodd, J., Gaskell, G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2004). Modelling the effects of semantic ambiguity in word recognition. Cognitive Science, 28, 89-104.
51. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, D. J. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
52. Seidenberg, M. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1979). Orthographic effects in rhyme monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 546-554.
53. Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M. A., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 383-404.
54. Staphorsius, G., Krom, P. S. H., & de Geus, K. (1988). Frequenties van woordvormen en letterposities in jeugdliteratuur [Frequencies of word forms and letter positions in youth literature]. Arnhem, the Netherlands: Cito.
55. Stone, G. O. (1994). Combining connectionist and symbolic properties in a single process. In S. D. Lima, L. Corigan, & G. K. Iverson (Eds.), The reality of linguistic rules (pp. 417-444). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
56. Stone, G. O., Vanhoy, M., & Van Orden, G. C. (1997). Perception is a two-way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 337-359.
57. Taraban, R., & McClelland, J. L. (1987). Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 608-631.
58. Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 107-136.
59. van den Bos, K. P., Spelberg, H. C. L., Scheepstra, A. J. M., & de Vries, J. R. (1994). De Klepel: Een test voor de leesvaardigheid van pseudowoorden. [De Klepel: A test for pseudoword reading skill]. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Berkhout.
60. Vanhoy, M., & Van Orden, G. C. (2001). Pseudohomophones and word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 29, 522-529.
61. van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Bus, A. G. (1994). Meta-analytic confirmation of the nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia. Reading Research Quarterly, 29, 266-275.
62. Van Orden, G. C., Bosman, A. M. T., Goldinger, S. D., & Farrar, W. T. (1997). A recurrent network account of reading, spelling, and dyslexia. In J. W. Donahoe & V. Packard Dorsel (Eds.), Neural network models of cognition: A biobehavioral foundation (pp. 522-538). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers.
63. Van Orden, G. C., & Goldinger, S. D. (1994). Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1269-1291.
64. Van Orden, G. C., & Goldinger, S. D. (1996). Phonologic mediation in skilled and dyslexic reading. In C. H. Chase, G. D. Rosen, & G. F. Sherman (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia: Neural, cognitive, and genetic mechanisms (pp. 185-223). Timonium, MD: York Press.
65. Van Orden, G. C., Holden, J. G., Podgornik, M. N., & Aitchison, C. S. (1999). What swimming says about reading: Coordination, context and homophone errors. Ecological Psychology, 11, 45-79.
66. Van Orden, G. C., & Kloos, H. (2005). The question of phonology and reading. In M. J. Snowling, & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 61-78). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
67. Van Orden, G. C., Pennington, B. F., & Stone, G. O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review, 97, 488-522.
68. Vellutino, F. R., & Scanlon, D. M. (1989). Some prerequisites for interpreting results from reading-level matched designs. Journal of Reading Behavior, 21, 361-385.
69. Waters, G. S., Bruck, M., & Seidenberg, M. (1985). Do children use similar processes to read and spell words? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 511-530.
70. Wike, E. L., & Church, J. D. (1976). Comments on Clark's "The language-as-fixed-effects fallacy." Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 249-255.
71. Wimmer, H. (1996). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: Evidence from children learning to read German. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61, 80-90.
72. Zecker, S. G. (1991). The orthographic code: Developmental trends in reading-disabled and normally-achieving children. Annals of Dyslexia, 41, 178-192.
73. Zecker, S. G., Tanenhaus, M. K., Alderman, L., & Siqueland, L. (1986). Lateralization of lexical codes. Brain and Language, 29, 372-389.
74. Ziegler, J. C., & Ferrand, L. (1998). Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 683-689.
75. Ziegler, J. C., Ferrand, L., & Montant, M. (2004). Visual phonology: The effects of orthographic consistency on different auditory word recognition tasks. Memory & Cognition, 32, 732-741.
76. Ziegler, J. C., Jacobs, A. M., & Stone, G. O. (1996). Statistical analysis of the bidirectional inconsistency of spelling and sound in French. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 28, 504-515.
77. Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., Ma-Wyatt, A., Ladner, D., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2003). Developmental dyslexia in different languages: Language-specific or universal? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 169-193.
78. Ziegler, J. C., Montant, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (1997). The feedback consistency effect in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 533-554.
79. Ziegler, J. C., Stone, G. O., & Jacobs, A. M. (1997). What is the pronunciation for -ough and the spelling for /u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 29, 600-618.