The value of specific radiological features in the classification of acetabular fractures

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 89, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 72-76

  Patel, V ^a   Day, A ^b   Dinah, Feroz ^c,d   Kelly, M ^e   Bircher, M ^b  

^a ST HELIER HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b ST GEORGE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c KINGSTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d Edinburgh Royal Infirmary ^*  (United Kingdom)

^e ROYAL INFIRMARY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM FRACTURE; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; HUMAN; JOINT DISLOCATION; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; OBSERVER VARIATION; PELVIS RADIOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ACETABULUM; FRACTURES, BONE; HUMANS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 33846892785     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B1.18069     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Judet R, Judet J, Letournel E. Fractures of the acetabulum: classification and surgical approaches for open reduction. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1964;46-A:1615-46.
2. Letournel E, Judet R. Fractures of the acetabulum. Second ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1993.
3. Swiontkowski MF, Sands AK, Agel J, et al. Interobserver variation in the AO/OTA fracture classification system for pilon fractures: is there a problem? J Orthop Trauma 1997;11:467-70.
4. Letournel E. Acetabulum fractures: classification and management. Clin Orthop 1980;151:81-106.
5. Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, Matta JM. Letournel classification for acetabular fractures: assessment of interobserver and intraobserver reliability. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2003;85-A:1704-9.
6. Petrisor BA, Bhandari M, Orr RD, et al. Improving reliability in the classification of fractures of the acetabulum. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2003;123:228-33.
7. Visutipol B, Chobtangsin P, Ketmalasari B, Pattarabanjird N, Varodompun N. Evaluation of Letournel and Judet classification of acetabular fractures with plain radiographs and three-dimensional computerized tomographic scan. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2000;8:33-7.
8. Saterbak AM, Marsh JL, Turbett T, Brandser E. Acetabular fractures classification of Letournel and Judet: a systematic approach. Iowa Orthop J 1995;15:184-96.
9. Brandser E, Marsh JL. Acetabular fractures: easier classification with a systematic approach. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:1217-28.
10. Tile M. Fractures of the pelvis and acetabulum. Second ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1995.
11. No authors listed. Fracture and dislocation compendium. J Orthop Trauma 1996;10(Supp 1):71-5.
12. Middleton F, Patel VR, Kelly M, et al. Classification of fractures of the acetabulum: does a systematic approach improve reliability? Poster presented at EFORT 6th Congress, Helsinki, Finland, 2003.
13. Muller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P, Schatzker J. The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1990.
14. Fleiss JL. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin 1971;76:378-82.
15. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:59-74.
16. Mayo KA. Fractures of the acetabulum. Orthop Clin North Am 1987;18:43-57.