Attributes of independent project reviews in nasa

EMJ - Engineering Management Journal

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 3-10

  Sauser, Brian J ^a  

^a STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Independent reviews; Project reviews

Indexed keywords

AEROSPACE ENGINEERING; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS;

ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT; INDEPENDENT REVIEWS; PROJECT REVIEWS;

PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

EID: 33846877361     PISSN: 10429247     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10429247.2006.11431707     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Beilin, E., and N.N. Dubler, “The Quality Improvement - Research Divide and the Need for External Oversight,” American Journal of Public Health, 91:9 (2001), pp. 1512-17.
2. Bergquist, M., J. Ljungberg, and U. Lundh-Snis, “Practicing Peer Review in Organizations: A Qualifier for Knowledge Dissemination and Legitimization,” Journal of Information Technology, 16 (2001), pp. 99-112.
3. Bodner, S., and C. Paine, “When Peer Review Fails: Problems with a Giant Laser Project,” Nature, 407 (2000), p. 129.
4. Brass, D.J., J. Galaskiewicz, H.R. Greve, and T. Wenpin, “Taking Stock of Networks and Organizations: A Multilevel Perspective,” Academy of Management Journal, 47:6 (2004), pp. 795-817.
5. Burt, R., Structural Holes, Harvard University Press (1992).
6. CAIB, Columbia Accident Investiation Board Report, Nationa Aeronautics and Space Administration (2003).
7. CPMR, “Center for Program/Project Management Research,” in Research Announcement 01-RA 04-01, p. 8; Columbia, MD: USRA (2004).
8. Cross, R., and J.N. Cummings, “Tie and Network Correlates of Individual Performance in Knowedge-Intensive Work,” Academy of Manageent Journal, 47:6 (2004), pp. 928-37.
9. Denzin, N., The Research Act, Prentice Hall (1984).
10. Eisenhardt, K.M., “Building Theories from Case Study Research,” Academy of Magaement Review, 14:4 (1989), pp. 532-50.
11. Gillham, B., Case Study Research Methods, Continuum (2000).
12. Griner, C.S., and W.B. Keegan, Enhancing Mission Success—A Framework for the Future: A Report by the NASA Chief Engineer and the NASA Integrated Action Team, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (2000).
13. Keil, M., and D. Robey, “Turning Around Troubled Software Projects: An Exploratory Study of the Deescalation of Commitment to Failing Courses of Action,” Journal of Magaement Information Systems, 15:4 (1999), pp. 63-87.
14. Landers, J., “Peer Review of Corps Projects Called for in House Bill,” Civil Engineer (2003), pp. 10-11.
15. NASA, NASA Program and Project Management Processes and Requirements, NPD 7120.5C, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (2005, March 22).
16. Rogers, W.J., Report of the Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident, National Aeronatucis and Space Administration (1986).
17. Shapira, P., J. Youtie, and D.J. Roessner, “Current Practices in the Evaluation of U.S. Industrial Moderniazation Programs,” Research Policy, 25 (1996), pp. 185-214.
18. Shenhar, A.J., “Real Life Project Analysis—Guidelines,” Stevens Institute of Technology (1999).
19. Stake, R., The Art of Case Research, Sage Publications (1995).
20. Yin, R.K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage Publications (1994).