Composite materials with viscoelastic stiffness greater than diamond

Science

Volumn 315, Issue 5812, 2007, Pages 620-622

  Jaglinski, T ^a   Kochmann, D ^b   Stone, D ^c   Lakes, R S ^d  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^d University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BARIUM DERIVATIVE; BARIUM TITANATE; TIN; TITANIUM DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

COMPOSITE; DIAMOND; STIFFNESS; VISCOELASTICITY; YOUNG MODULUS;

ARTICLE; MATERIALS; MORPHOLOGY; PARTICLE SIZE; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGIDITY; VISCOELASTICITY; YOUNG MODULUS;

EID: 33846840981     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1135837     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. J. M. T. Thompson, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. A 292, 1 (1979).
2. R. 5. Lakes, Philos. Mag. Lett. 81, 95 (2001).
3. R. 5. Lakes, P. Rosakis, A. Ruina, J. Mater. Sci. 28, 4667 (1993).
4. L. D. Landau, in Collected Papers of L. D. Landau, D. Ter Taar, Ed. (Gordon and Breach/Pergamon, New York, 1965), pp. 193-216.
5. R. Lakes, Science 235, 1038 (1987).
6. A. Yeganeh-Haeri, D. J. Weidner, J. B. Parise, Science 257, 650 (1992).
7. R. H. Baughman, J. M. 5hacklette, A. A. Zakhidov, 5. 5tafstrom, Nature 392, 362 (1998).
8. Within continuum mechanics, there is no size limitation for a constrained object of negative bulk modulus to be stable. Thermodynamics suggests a size-dependent metastability associated with negative compressibility, owing to the nonzero size of atoms and the nonzero temperature. The time scale for such metastability in solids may, however, exceed experimental time scales. Indeed, diamond itself is metastable.
9. J. Van der Waals, thesis, University of Leiden, Netherlands (1873) [English translation, J. R. Rowlinson, Ed. (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1988)].
10. B. Moore, T. Jaglinski, D. S. Stone, R. S. Lakes, Philos. Mag. Lett. 86, 651 (2006).
11. T. A. Mary, J. S. O. Evans, T. Vogt, A. W. Sleight, Science 272, 90 (1996).
12. R. S. Lakes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2897 (2001).
13. R. S. Lakes, W. J. Drugan, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 50, 979 (2002).
14. Z. Hashin, S. Shtrikman, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 11, 127 (1963).
15. R. S. Lakes, T. Lee, A. Bersie, Y. C. Wang, Nature 410, 565 (2001).
16. T. Jaglinski, R. 5. Lakes, Philos. Mag. Lett. 84, 803 (2004).
17. Y. Yang, J. Lan, X Li, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 380, 378 (2004).
18. Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
19. T. Lee, R. 5. Lakes, A. Lal, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 71, 2855 (2000).
20. Z. Hashin, J. Appl. Mech. 29, 143 (1962).
21. B. W. Rosen, Z. Hashin, Int. J. Eng. Sci. 8, 157 (1970).
22. Lord Kelvin (Thomson, W.), Philos. Mag. 26, 414 (1888).
23. E. Cosserat, F. Cosserat, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 126, 1089 (1898).
24. Partial support by N5F and by the N5F Materials Research Science and Engineering Center program is gratefully acknowledged. We thank W. Drugan for stimulating discussions.