Neural network model for liquefaction potential in soil deposits using Turkey and Taiwan earthquake data

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 521-540

  Hanna, Adel M ^a   Ural, Derin ^b   Saygili, Gokhan ^c  

^a Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (Canada)

^b ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

General regression neural networks; GRNN; Kocaeli earthquake; Liquefaction; Standard penetration test; Taiwan earthquake

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKES; ITERATIVE METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NEURAL NETWORKS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

GENERAL REGRESSION NEURAL NETWORK; TAIWAN; TURKEY;

SOIL LIQUEFACTION;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; EARTHQUAKE EVENT; LIQUEFACTION; MODEL; PENETRATION TEST; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRESS-STRAIN RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 33846833664     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Seed S.B., and Idriss I.M. Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. J Soil Mech Found Div 97 9 (1971) 1249-1273
2. Seed H.B., Tokimatsu K., Harder L.F., and Chung R. Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations. J Geotech Eng ASCE 111 12 (1985) 861-878
3. Tokimatsu K., and Yoshimi Y. Empirical correlation of soil liquefaction based on SPT N-value and fines content. Soils Found 23 4 (1983) 56-74
4. Berrill J.B., and Davis R.O. Energy dissipation and seismic liquefaction of sands: revised model. Soils Found 25 2 (1985) 106-118
5. Youd T.L., Idriss I.M., Andrus R.D., Arango I., Castro G., Christian J.T., et al. Liquefaction resistance of soils: summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 127 10 (2001) 817-833
6. Fausett L. Fundamentals of neural networks: architectures, and applications (1994), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
7. Goh A.T.C. Empirical design in geotechnics using neural networks. Geotechnique 45 4 (1995) 709-714
8. Teh C.L., Wong K.S., Goh A.T.C., and Jaritngam S. Predicting settlement of shallow foundations using neural networks. J Comput civil Eng 11 2 (1997) 129-138
9. Abu Keifa M.A. General regression neural networks for driven piles in cohesionless soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng Div ASCE 124 12 (1998) 1177-1185
10. Kim BT, Kim YS. Lateral load-deflection modeling of group pile using artificial neural networks. Proceedings of the International Deep Foundation Congress, Orlando, FL, 2002.
11. Shanin M.A., Maier H.R., and Jaska M.B. Predicting settlement of shallow foundations using neural networks. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng Div ASCE 128 9 (2002) 785-793
12. Hanna A.M., Morcous G., and Helmy M. Efficiency of pile groups driven in cohesionless soil using artificial neural network. Can Geotech J 41 6 (2004) 1241-1249
13. Goh A.T.C. Seismic liquefaction potential assessed by neural networks. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng Div ASCE 120 9 (1995) 1467-1480
14. Goh A.T.C. Neural network modeling of CPT seismic liquefaction data. J Geotech Eng 122 1 (1996) 70-73
15. Ural DN, Saka H. Liquefaction assessment by neural networks. Elect J Geotech Eng 1998; 〈http://geotech.civen.okstate.edu/ejge/ppr9803/index.html〉.
16. Juang C.H., Chen C.J., and Tien Y.-M. Appraising cone penetration test based liquefaction resistance evaluation methods: artificial neural network approach. Can Geotech J 36 (1999) 443-454
17. Juang C.H., Chen C.J., Jiang T., and Andrus R.D. Risk-based liquefaction potential evaluation using standard penetration tests. Can Geotech J 37 (2000) 1195-1208
18. Goh A.T.C. Probabilistic neural network for evaluating seismic liquefaction potential. Can Geotech J 39 (2002) 219-232
19. Scawthorn C. Earthquakes of 1999. In: Euro conference on global change and catastrophe risk management: earthquake risks in Europe, Laxenburg, Austria, 2000.
20. Bakir B.S., Sucuoglu H., and Yilmaz T. An overview of local site effects and the associated building damage in Adapazari during the 17 August 1999 Izmit earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92 1 (2002) 509-526
21. Risk Management Solutions Inc. Event report: Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake. CA, USA, 2000.
22. PEER. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research, 2002 〈http://peer.berkeley.edu〉.
23. Stewart JP, Chu DB, Lee S, Tsai JS, Lin PS, Chu BL, et al. Liquefaction and non-liquefaction from 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake. In: Beavers JE. editor. Technical council on lifeline earthquake engineering, Monograph no. 25, 2001. p.1021-30.
24. Flood I., and Kartam N. Neural networks in civil engineering. I: principles and understanding. J Comput Civil Eng ASCE 8 2 (1994) 131-148
25. Ghaboussi J. Potential applications of neuro-biological computational models in geotechnical engineering. In: Pande GN, Pietruszezak S. editors. Numerical models in geotechnics. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Balkema; 1992. p. 543-55.
26. Hammerstrom D. Working with neural networks. IEEE Spectrum 46-53 Process 4 2 (1993) 4-22
27. Specht D.F. A general regression neural network. IEEE Trans Neural Network 2 6 (1991) 568-576
28. Wasserman PD. Advanced methods in neural network. Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1993. p. 147-58.
29. Specht D.F. Probabilistic neural networks. IEEE Trans Neural Networks 3 1 (1990) 109-118
30. Specht D.F. Fuzzy logic and neural network handbook: chapter 3-probabilistic and general regression neural networks (1996), McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., New York
31. Boulanger R.W. High overburden stress effects in liquefaction analyses. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 129 12 (2003) 1071-1082
32. Seed RB, Cetin KO, Moss RES, Kammerer A, Wu J, Pestana JM, et al. Recent advances in soil liquefaction engineering: a unified and consistent framework. In: Keynote address, 26th annual geotechnical spring seminar, Los Angeles Section of the Geo Institute, American Society of Civil Engineers, H.M.S, Queen Mary, Long Beach, CA, USA, 2003.
33. Dobry R., Ladd R.S., Yokel F.Y., Chung R.M., and Powell D. Prediction of pore water pressure buildup and liquefaction of sands during earthquakes by the cyclic strain method. NBS Build Sci Ser 138, US Dept Commerce 152 (1982)
34. Dobry R, Stokoe KH, Ladd RS, Yound TL. Liquefaction susceptibility from S wave velocity. In: ASCE national convention, St. Louis, MO, USA, 26-31 October 1981, preprint 81-544.
35. Finn WDL, Ledbetter RH, Wu G. Liquefaction in silty soils: design and analysis. Ground failures under seismic conditions. Geotechnical Special Publication 44. New York: ASCE; 1994; p. 51-76.
36. Rauch AF. EPOLLS: An empirical method for prediciting surface displacements due to liquefaction-induced lateral spreading in earthquakes. PhD. dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1997.
37. Hardin B.O., and Drnevich V.P. Shear modulus and damping in soil: measurement and parameter effects. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 98 (1972) 603-624
38. Frederick MD. NeuroSHELL 2 user's manual-version 3.0. USA: Ward Systems Group, Inc.; 1996.
39. Andrus RD, Stokoe KH. Liquefaction resistance based on shear wave velocity. In: Proceedings of the NCEER workshop on evaluation of liquefaction resistance in soils. Technical report NCEER-97-0022, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 1997. p. 89-128.