A combination of serial resistances and concentration polarization models along the membrane in ultrafiltration of pectin and albumin solutions

Separation and Purification Technology

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 18-27

  Neggaz, Y ^a   Vargas, M Lopez ^b   Dris, A Ould ^a   Riera, F ^b   Alvarez, R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TECHNOLOGIE DE COMPIÈGNE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OVIEDO   (Spain)

Author keywords

Concentration polarization model; Mass transfer controlled regime; Pressure controlled regime; Regime transition; Ultrafiltration

Indexed keywords

LAMINAR FLOW; MASS TRANSFER; POLARIZATION; PRESSURE; PROTEINS; ULTRAFILTRATION;

CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION MODEL; MASS-TRANSFER-CONTROLLED REGIME; REGIME TRANSITION; RESISTANCE; TRANSMEMBRANE PRESSURES;

LIQUID MEMBRANES;

EID: 33846814960     PISSN: 13835866     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2006.08.017     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Hanemaaijer J.H., Robbertsen T., Boomgaard Van den Th., and Gunnink J.W. Fouling of ultrafiltration membranes. The role of protein adsorption and salt precipitation. J. Membr. Sci. 40 (1989) 199-217
2. Ricq L., Pierre A., Reggiani J.C., Zaragoza-Piqueras S., Pagetti J., and Daufin G. Effects of proteins on electrokinetic properties of inorganic membranes during ultra- and microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 114 (1996) 27-38
3. Bowen W.R., and Hughes D.T. Properties of microfiltration membranes. Part 2. Adsorption of bovine serum albumin at aluminium oxide membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 51 (1990) 189-200
4. Kelly S.T., and Zydney A.L. Effects of intermolecular thiol-disulfide interchange reactions on BSA fouling during microfiltration. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 44 (1994) 972-982
5. Kelly S.T., and Zydney A.L. Mechanisms of BSA fouling during microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 107 (1995) 115-127
6. Güell C., and Davis R.H. Membrane fouling during microfiltration of protein mixtures. J. Membr. Sci. 107 (1996) 269-284
7. Prádanos P., Hernandez A., Calvo J.I., and Tejerina F. Mechanisms of protein fouling in cross-flow ultrafiltration through an asymmetric inorganic membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 114 (1996) 115-126
8. Blatt W.F., David A., Michaels A.S., and Nelsen L. Solute Polarization and Cake Formation in Membrane Ultrafiltration: Causes, Consequences and Control Techniques, Membrane Science and Technology. Flin Ed. (1970), Plenum Press, New York pp. 47-97
9. Belfort G., Davis R.H., and Zydney A.L. The behaviour of suspensions and macromolecular solutions in crossflow microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 96 (1994) 1-58
10. Trettin D.R., and Doshi M.R. Limiting flux in ultrafiltration of macromolecular solutions. Chem. Eng. Commun. 4 (1980) 507-522
11. Lojkin M.H., Field R.W., and Howell J.A. Crossflow microfiltration of cell suspensions: a review of models with emphasis on particle size effects. Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng. 70 Part C (1992) 149-164
12. Romero C.A., and Davis R.H. Transient model of crossflow microfiltration. Chem. Eng. Sci. 45 (1990) 13-25
13. Zydney A.L., and Colton C.K. A concentration polarization model for the filtrate flux in cross-flow microfiltration of particulate suspensions. Chem. Eng. Commun. 47 (1989) 1-21
14. Eckstein E.C., Bailey D.G., and Shapiro A.H. Self-diffusion of particles in shear flow of suspension. J. Fluid. Mech. 79 (1979) 615-622
15. Nakao S.I., Nomura T., and Kimura S. Characteristics of macromolecular gel layer formed on ultrafiltration tubular membrane. AIChE J. 25 (1979) 615-622
16. Karode S.K. A method for prediction of the gel concentration in macromolecular ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 171 (2000) 131-139
17. Porter M.C. Concentration polarization with membrane ultrafiltration. Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 11 (1972) 234-248
18. Blumenkrantz N., and Asboe-Hansen G. New method for quantitative determination of uronic acids. Anal. Biochem. 54 (1973) 484-489
19. Charcosset C., and Choplin L. Ultrafiltration of non-Newtonian fluids. J. Membr. Sci. 115 (1996) 147-160
20. 3 suspensions under varying conditions. J. Membr. Sci. 175 (2000) 267-283
21. Ould-Dris A., Jaffrin M.Y., Si-Hassen D., and Neggaz Y. Effect of cake thickness and particle polydispersity on prediction of permeate flux in microfiltration of particulate suspensions by a hydrodynamic diffusion model. J. Membr. Sci. 164 (2000) 211-227
22. Bacchin P. A possible link between critical and limiting flux for colloidal systems: consideration of critical deposit formation along a membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 228 (2004) 237-241
23. Bacchin P., Si-Hassen D., Starov V., Clifton M.J., and Aimar P. A unifying model for concentration polarization, gel-layer formation and particle deposition in cross-flow membrane filtration of colloidal suspensions. Chem. Eng. Sci. 57 (2002) 77-91
24. Howell J.A. Sub-critical flux operation of microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 107 (1995) 165-171