Arthroscopic versus open acromioplasty: A systematic review

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 455, Issue , 2007, Pages 64-71

  Barfield, L Cole ^a   Kuhn, John E ^a  

^a Vanderbilt Sports Medicine Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACROMION; ADULT; ANALGESIA; CLINICAL STUDY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MUSCLE STRENGTH; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANGE OF MOTION; ROTATOR CUFF RUPTURE; SCORING SYSTEM; SHOULDER ARTHROSCOPY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WORK RESUMPTION; ARTHROSCOPY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; INJURY; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; ROTATOR CUFF; RUPTURE; SHOULDER;

ACROMION; ARTHROSCOPY; HUMANS; PAIN MEASUREMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; ROTATOR CUFF; RUPTURE; SHOULDER JOINT;

EID: 33846810983     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31802f5436     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Burkhead WZ, Habermeyher P. The rotator cuff: a historical review of our understanding. In: Burkhead WZ, ed. Rotator Cuff Disorders. Philadelphia, PA: Williams & Wilkins; 1996:3-20.
2. Checroun A, Dennis M, Zuckerman J. Open versus arthroscopic decompression for subacromial impingement: a comprehensive review of the literature from the last 25 years. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 1998;57:145-151.
3. Ellman H. Arthroscopic subacromial decompression. Arthroscopy. 1987;3:173-181.
4. Husby T, Haugstvedt JR, Brandt M, Holm I, Steen H. Open versus arthroscopic subacromial decompression: a prospective, randomized study of 34 patients followed for eight years. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003;74:408-417.
5. Ingvarsson T, Hagglund G, Johnsson R. Anterior acromioplasty: a comparison of two techniques. Int Orthop. 1996;20:290-292.
6. Kirkley A, Griffin S, Dainty K. Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder. Arthroscopy. 2003;19:1109-1120.
7. Kuhn JE, Blasier RB. Measuring outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty. Semin Arthroplasty. 1995;6:245-264.
8. Lindh M, Norlin R. Arthroscopic subacromial decompression versus open acromioplasty: a two year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;290:174-176.
9. Mayer D. Essential Evidence Based Medicine. Cambridge University Press: New York; 2004.
10. Neer CS II. Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972;54:41-50.
11. Neer CS II. Shoulder Reconstruction. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1990.
12. Neviaser RJ, Neviaser TJ. Lesions of musculotendinous cuff of shoulder: diagnosis and management. Instr Course Lect. 1981;30:239-257.
13. Nicholson GP. Arthroscopic acromioplasty: a comparison between workers' compensation and non-workers' compensation populations. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:682-689.
14. Norlin R. Arthroscopic subacromial decompression versus open acromioplasty. Arthroscopy. 1989;5:321-323.
15. Sachs RA, Stone ML, Devine S. Open vs. arthroscopic acromioplasty: a prospective randomized study. Arthroscopy. 1994;10:248-254.
16. Spangehl M, Hawkins R, McCormack RG, Loomer R. Arthroscopic versus open acromioplasty: a prospective, randomized blinded study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:101-107.
17. Spindler KP, Kuhn JE, Dunn W, Matthews CE, Harrell FE, Dittus RS. Reading and reviewing the orthopaedic literature: a systematic, evidence based medicine approach. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005;13:220-229.