Micronutrient availability in fresh and aged Douglas fir bark

HortScience

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 152-156

  Buamscha, M Gabriela ^a   Altland, James E ^b   Sullivan, Daniel M ^a   Horneck, Donald A ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Annual vinca; Catharanthus roseus; Composted yard debris; Container substrate; Media; Micromax; Pseudotsuga menziesii

Indexed keywords

COMPOSTING; NUTRITION; PLANTS (BOTANY); WOOD;

COMPOSTED YARD DEBRIS; CONTAINER SUBSTRATES; MICROMAX;

FORESTRY;

COMPOSTING; FORESTRY; NUTRITION; PLANTS; PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII; WOOD;

CATHARANTHUS ROSEUS; MENTHA X PIPERITA; PSEUDOTSUGA; PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII; VINCA;

EID: 33846804138     PISSN: 00185345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.42.1.152     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Altland, J.E., C.H. Gilliam, J.H. Edwards, G.J. Keever, D.C. Fare, and J.L. Sibley. 2002. Rapid determination of nitrogen status in annual vinca. J. Environ. Hort. 20:189-194.
2. Bollen, W.B. 1969. Properties of tree barks in relation to their agricultural utilization. USDA For. Serv. Res. Paper PNW 77.
3. Broschat, T.K. and H.M. Donselman. 1985. Extractable Mg, Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu from a peat-based container medium amended with various micronutrient fertilizers. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 110:196-200.
4. Buamscha, G., J. Altland, D. Sullivan, and D. Horneck. 2005. Chemical and physical properties of Douglas fir bark used in container production. SNA Res. Conf. Vol. 50:29-32.
5. Gavlak, R., D. Horneck, R. Miller, and J. Kotuby-Amacher. 2003. Soil, plant, and water reference methods for the Western Region. 2nd Ed. WCC-103 Publication, Fort Collins, Colo.
6. Handreck, K. and N. Black. 2002. Growing media for ornamental plants and turf. Univ. of New South Wales Press Ltd., Sydney.
7. Harkin, J.M. and J. W. Rowe. 1971. Bark and its possible uses. USDA. For. Serv. For. Prod. Lab. Madison, Wis. Res. Note FPL-0.91.9 Mar. 2005. 〈http://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/ fplrn/fplrn091.pdf〉.
8. Mills, H.A. and J.B. Jones. 1996. Plant analysis handbook II. MicroMacro Publishing, Athens, Ga.
9. Niemiera, A.X. 1992. Micronutrient supply from pine bark and micronutrient fertilizers. HortScience 27:272.
10. Rose, M.A. and H. Wang. 1999. Comparison of micronutrient sources for container Rhododendron. HortTechnology 9:220-224.
11. SAS Institute. 1982. SAS user's guide and SAS statistical procedures. SAS Inst., Cary, N.C.
12. Svenson, S.E. and W.T. Witte. 1992. Ca, Mg, and micronutrient nutrition and growth of pelargonium in pine bark amended with composted hardwood bark. J. Environ. Hort. 10:125-129.
13. Thomas, P.A. and J.G. Latimer. 1995. Nutrient charge, composition of media and nitrogen form affect growth of vinca. J. Plant Nutr. 18:2127-2134.
14. Tisdale, S.L., W.L. Nelson, and J.D. Beaton. 1985. Soil fertility and fertilizers, Fourth ed., Macmillan, N.Y.
15. Warncke, D.D. 1986. Analyzing greenhouse growth media by the saturation extraction method. HortScience 21:223-225.
16. Warncke, D. 1998. Recommended test procedure for greenhouse growth media, p. 34-37. In: W.C. Dahnke (ed.), Recommended chemical soil test procedures for the North Central region. North Central Reg. Res. Pub. No. 221. Miss. Agr. Expt. Stat. SB 1001.
17. Wilkins, H.F. 1988. University of Minnesota - Tissue analysis standards. Minnesota St. Florist Bulletin. Vol. 37, No 6.
18. Wright, A.N., A.X. Niemiera, J.R. Harris, and R.D. Wright. 1999. Preplant lime and micronutrient amendments to pine bark affect growth of seedlings of nine container-grown tree species. HortScience 34:669-673.