Baseline mapping of Phragmites australis (common reed) in three coastal Mississippi estuarine basins

Southeastern Naturalist

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 747-756

  Peterson, Mark S ^a   Partyka, Melissa L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PHRAGMITES AUSTRALIS;

EID: 33846798113     PISSN: 15287092     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1656/1528-7092(2006)5[747:BMOPAC]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Able, K.W., S.M. Hagan, and S.A. Brown. 2003. Mechanisms of marsh habitat alteration due to Phragmites: Response of young-of-the-year mummichog (Fundulus heteroclitus) to treatment for Phragmites removal. Estuaries 26:484-494.
2. Bart, D., and J.M. Hartman. 2000. Environmental determinants of Phragmites australis expansion in a New Jersey salt marsh: An experimental approach. Oikos 89(1):59-69.
3. Bart, D., and J.M. Hartman. 2002. Environmental constraints on early establishment of Phragmites australis in salt marshes. Wetlands 22:201-213.
4. Burdick, D.M., and R.A. Konisky. 2003. Determinants of expansion for Phragmites australis, common reed, in natural and impacted coastal marshes. Estuaries 26(2B):407-416.
5. Christmas, J.Y. (Ed.). 1973. Cooperative Gulf of Mexico Estuarine Inventory and Study, Mississippi. Mississippi Marine Conservation Commission, Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, Ocean Springs, MS. 434 pp.
6. Hanson, S.R., D.T. Osgood, and D.J. Yozzo. 2002. Nekton use of a Phragmites australis marsh on the Hudson River, New York, USA. Wetlands 22:326-337.
7. Havens, K.J., H. Berquist, and W.I. Priest III. 2003. Common reed grass, Phragmites australis, expansion into constructed wetlands: Are we mortgaging our wetland future? Estuaries 26(2B):417-422.
8. Marks, M., B. Lapin, and J. Randall. 1994. Phragmites australis (P. communis): Threats, management, and monitoring. Natural Areas Journal 14:285-294.
9. Minchinton, T.E., and M.D. Bertness. 2003. Disturbance-mediated competition and the spread of Phragmites australis in a coastal marsh. Ecological Applications 13:1400-1416.
10. Occhipinti-Ambrogi, A., and B.S. Galil. 2004. A uniform terminology on bioinvasions: A chimera or an operative tool? Marine Pollution Bulletin 49:688-694.
11. Peterson, M.S., M.R. Weber, M.L. Partyka, and S.T. Ross. In press. Integrating in situ quantitative geographic information tools and size-specific laboratory-based growth zones in a dynamic river-mouth estuary. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems.
12. Raichel, D.L., K.W. Able, and J.M. Hartman. 2003. The influence of Phragmites (Common Reed) on the distribution, abundance, and potential prey of a resident marsh fish in the Hackensack Meadowlands, New Jersey. Estuaries 26:511-521.
13. Roman, C.T., W.A. Niering, and R.S. Warren. 1984. Salt marsh vegetation change in response to tidal restoration. Environmental Management 8:141-150.
14. Saltonstall, K. 2002. Cryptic invasion by a non-native genotype of the common reed, Phragmites australis, into North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99(4):2445-2449.
15. Saltonstall, K. 2003. Genetic variation among North American populations of Phragmites australis: Implications for management. Estuaries 26:444-451.
16. Warren, R.S., P.E. Fell, J.L. Grimsby, E.L. Buck, G.C. Rilling, and R.A. Fertik. 2001. Rates, patterns, and impacts of Phragmites australis expansion and effects of experimental Phragmites control on vegetation, macroinvertebrates, and fish within tidelands of the lower Connecticut River. Estuaries 24(1):90-107.
17. White, D.A., D.P. Hauber, and C.S. Hood. 2004. Clonal differences in Phragmites australis from the Mississippi River delta. Southeastern Naturalist 3(3):531-544.