Reply to discussions of “Editorial—The peer review system: Prospects and challenges

Hydrological Sciences Journal

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 357-363

  Kundzewicz, Z W ^a,b   Koutsoyiannis, D ^c  

^a POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (Poland)

^b POTSDAM INSTITUTE FOR CLIMATE IMPACT RESEARCH   (Germany)

^c NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846788530     PISSN: 02626667     EISSN: 21503435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1623/hysj.51.2.357     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. AAAS Office of Public Programs. 2006. Science editorial statement concerning stem cell manuscripts by Woo Suk Hwang et al http://www.sciencemag.org/sciext/hwang2005/science_statement.pdf.
2. Armstrong, J. S., 1982. Barriers to scientific contributions:the author's formula. Behavioral and Brain Sci., 5 (2):197–199. http://ideas.repec.org/p/wpa/wuwpgt/0502057.html
3. Chong, S., and Normile, D., 2006. Stem cells:how young Korean researchers helped unearth a scandal…. Science, 311 (5757):22–25. doi:10.1126/science.311.5757.22
4. Couzin, J., 2006. Stem cells:…and how the problems eluded peer reviewers and editors. Science, 311 (5757):23–24. doi:10.1126/science.311.5757.23
5. Dobbs, D., 2006. “ Trial and Error ”. In New York Times 15 January 2006
6. Ioannidis, J. P. A., 2005. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med., 2 (8):124
7. Kundzewicz, Z. W., and Koutsoyiannis, D., 2005. Editorial—The peer-review system:prospects and challenges. Hydrol, Sci. J., 50 (4):577–590.
8. Makropoulos, C., Butler, D., and Maksimovic, C., 2006. Discussion of:“Editorial—The peer-review system:prospects and challenges” by Z. W. Kundzewicz & D. Koutsoyiannis. Hydrol, Sci. J., 50 (4):577–590.
9. Hydrol. Sci. J., 51 (2) 350–351. (this issue)
10. Pannell, D. J., 2002. Prose, psychopaths and persistence:personal perspectives on publishing. Can. J. Agric. Economics, 50 (2):101–116.
11. Pannell, D. J., 2006. Discussion of:“Editorial—The peer-review system:prospects and challenges” by Z. W. Kundzewicz & D. Koutsoyiannis. Hydrol, Sci. J., 50 (4):577–590.
12. Hydrol. Sci. J., 51 (2) 352–353. (this issue)
13. Parlange, M. B., Berkowitz, B., Porporato, A., Torgersen, T., and Tyler, S. W., 2005. Editorial:future of. Water Resources Research. Water Resour. Res., 41:W01001 doi:10.1029/2004WR003899
14. Roth, K., Savenije, H., and Sivapalan, M., 2005. Editorial. Hydrol. Earth System Sci., 9:1–2.
15. Schumann, A., 2006. Discussion of:“Editorial—The peer-review system:prospects and challenges” by Z. W. Kundzewicz & D. Koutsoyiannis (. Hydrol, Sci. J., 50 (4):577–590. Hydrol. Sci. J.51(2), 354 (this issue)
16. Wong, T. S. W., 2006. Discussion of:“Editorial—The peer-review system:prospects and challenges” by Z. W. Kundzewicz & D. Koutsoyiannis (. Hydrol, Sci. J., 50 (4):577–590. Hydrol. Sci. J.51(2), 355–356 (this issue)