Mothers' accounts of screening newborn babies in Wales (UK)

Midwifery

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 59-65

  Parsons, Evelyn P ^a   King, Janet T ^b   Israel, Janet A ^c   Bradley, Don M ^d  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL GWENT HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c LLANDOUGH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF WALES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MATERNAL BEHAVIOR; METHODOLOGY; MOTHER; NEWBORN; NEWBORN SCREENING; NURSE ATTITUDE; NURSE PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; POSTNATAL CARE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED KINGDOM; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MATERNAL BEHAVIOR; MOTHERS; NARRATION; NEONATAL SCREENING; NURSE'S ROLE; NURSE-PATIENT RELATIONS; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; POSTNATAL CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; WALES;

EID: 33846783194     PISSN: 02666138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2006.05.008     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. De Wert G.M. Neonatal screening: dynamics and ethics. Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde 149 (2005) 2841-2843
2. Department of Health. Changing Childbirth (1993), HMSO, London
3. Department of Health. Department of Health Reference Guide to Consent for Examination and Treatment (2001), Department of Health, London
4. Department of Health. A Year of Transition, A Year of Reform (2006), Department of Health, London
5. Faulder C. Whose Body Is It? The Troubling Issue of Informed Consent (1985), Virago, London
6. Geller G., Strauss M., Bernhardt B., and Holtzman N. Decoding Informed Consent: Insights from Women Regarding Breast Cancer Susceptibility Testing. Hastings Centre Report March-April 1997 (1997) 28-33
7. Green, J.M., Hewison, J., Bekker, H.L., et al., 2004. Psychosocial aspects of genetics screening of pregnant women and newborns: a systematic review. Health Technology Assessment 8.
8. Kass N., Sugarman J., Faden R., and Schoch-Spana M. Trust: The Fragile Foundation of Contemporary Bio-medical Research. Hastings Centre Report 26 5 (1996) 25-29
9. Kirkham M., and Stapleton H. Informed choice in maternity care: an evaluation of evidence based leaflets. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (2001), York Publishing Services, York
10. Michie S., Smith D., and Marteau T. Prenatal tests: how are women deciding?. Prenatal Diagnosis 19 (1999) 743-748
11. Murphy E. 'Breast is best': infant feeding decisions and maternal deviance. Sociology of Health and Illness 21 (1999) 187-208
12. Parsons E.P., Clarke A.J., Hood K., et al. Newborn screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a psychosocial study. Archives of Disease in Childhood 86 (2002) F91-F95
13. th edn (2003), Nature Publishing Group, London
14. Parsons E.P., and Bradley D.M. Newborn screening Wales: a review. Welsh Paediatric Journal 19 (2003) 48-53
15. Schutz A. On phenomenolgy and social relations (1970), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
16. Schutz A., and Luckmann B. The Structure of the Life World (1974), London, Heineman
17. UK Newborn Screening Programme Centre. Newborn blood spot screening in the UK: policies and standards (2005), UK Newborn Screening Programme Centre, London
18. WAG. Welsh Assembly Government Signposts 2: Putting Public and Patient Involvement into Practice in Wales (2003), Crown Copyright, London