Verbalism in the narrative language of children who are blind and sighted

Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness

Volumn 99, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 413-425

  Rosel, Jesús ^a   Caballer, Antonio ^a   Jara, Pilar ^a   Oliver, Juan Carlos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT JAUME I   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; BLINDNESS; COGNITION; CONGENITAL DISORDER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NARRATIVE; SCHOOL CHILD; SOCIAL INTERACTION; VERBALIZATION; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT;

EID: 33846700409     PISSN: 0145482X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0145482x0509900704     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bentler, P. M. (2004). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
2. Bonge, D. R., Schuldt, W. J., & Harper, Y. Y. (1992). The experimenter as fixed effect fallacy. Journal of Psychology, 126, 477-486.
3. Cutsforth, T. D. (1932). The unreality of words to the blind. Teachers Forum, 4, 86-89.
4. Cutsforth, T. D. (1951). The blind in school and society. New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
5. Demott, R. M. (1972). Verbalism and affective meaning for blind, severely visually impaired and normally sighted children. New Outlook for the Blind, 66, 1-8.
6. Dokecki, P. R. (1966). Verbalism and the blind: A critical review of the concept and the literature. Exceptional Children, 32, 525-532.
7. Dunlea, A. (1989). Vision and the emergence of meaning: Blind and sighted children's early language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Dunn, G., Everitt, B., & Pickles, A. (1993) Modelling covariances and latent variables using EQS. London: Chapman & Hall.
9. Gleitman, L. (1990). The structural sources of verb meanings. Language Acquisition, 1(1), 3-55.
10. Harley, R. K. (1963). Verbalism among blind children. New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
11. Henri, P. (1948). Cécité et verbalisme [Blindness and verbalism]. Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique, 41, 216-240.
12. Kaplan, D. (2000). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Kemter, P. (1999). Concept formation and spatial perception in blind persons. Rehabilitation, 38(1), 27-32.
14. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
15. Landau, B. (1997). Language and experience in blind children: Retrospective and prospective. In V. Lewis & G. M. Collis (Eds.), Blindness and psychological development in young children. Leicester, England: British Psychological Society.
16. Landau, B., & Gleitman, L. R. (1985). Language and experience: Evidence from the blind child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. Maruyama, G. M. (1998). Basics of structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. McGinnis, A. R. (1981). Functional linguistic strategies of blind children. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 5, 210-214.
19. Mills, A. E. (Ed.). (1983). Language acquisition in the blind child: Normal and deficient. London: Croom Helm.
20. Monti, E. (1983). Verbalism in young blind children. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 77(2), 61-63.
21. Mueller, R. O. (1998). Basic principles of structural equation modeling. New York: Springer.
22. Mulford, R. (1988). First words of the blind child. In M. D. Smith & J. L. Locke (Eds.), The emergent lexicon: The child's development of a linguistic vocabulary. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
23. Nolan, C. Y. (1960). On the unreality of words on the blind. New Outlook for the Blind, 54, 100-102.
24. Pérez-Pereira, M., & Castro, J. (1997). Language acquisition and the compensation of visual deficit: New comparative data on a controversial topic. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15, 439-459.
25. Pérez-Pereira, M., & Conti-Ramsden, G. (1999). Language development and social interaction in blind children. Hove, England: Psychology Press.
26. Raykov, T., & Penev, S. (2001). The problem of equivalent structural equation models: An individual residual perspective. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27. Rencher, A. C. (1995). Methods of multivariate analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
28. Rosenthal, R. (1967). Covert communication in the psychological experiment. Psychological Bulletin, 67, 356-367.
29. Satorra, A. (2001). Goodness of fit testing of structural equation models with multiple group data and nonnormality. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software.
30. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. Von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399-419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Sheldrake, R. (2001). Experiments on the sense of being stared at: The elimination of possible artefacts. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 65, 122-137.
32. SPSS. (1999). SPSS base 10.0 syntax reference guide. Chicago: Author.
33. Stevens, J. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Allyn & Bacon.
35. Thinus-Blanc, C., & Gaunet, F. (1997). Representation of space in blind persons: Vision as a spatial sense? Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 20-41.
36. Tuldava, J. (1998). Investigating causal relations in language with the help of path analysis. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 5, 256-261.
37. Ullman, J. B. (2001). Structural equation modeling. In B. G. Tabachnick & L. S. Fidell (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics (pp. 653-771). New York: Allyn & Bacon.
38. von Tetzchner, S., & Martinsen, H. (1980). A psycholinguistic study of the language of the blind: I. Verbalism. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 7, 49-61.
39. Warren, D. H. (1994). Blindness and children: An individual differences approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. Williams, L. J., Bozdogan, H., & Aiman-Smith, L. (1996). Inference problems with equivalent models. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41. Yuan, K. H., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A unified approach to multigroup structural equation modeling with nonstandard samples. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 35-56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42. Zeppuhar, M. E., & Walls, R. T. (1998). Knowledge of concept prototypes of students who are blind or have low vision. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 92, 812-822.