Supporting simulation-based decision making with the use of AHP analysis

Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference

Volumn 2005, Issue , 2005, Pages 2042-2051

  Rabelo, Luís ^a   Eskandari, Hamidreza ^a   Shalan, Tarek ^a   Helal, Magdy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROCESS CONTROL; STATISTICS;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHICAL PROCESS (AHP) ANALYSIS; DISCRETE-CONTINUOUS SIMULATION; GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAINS; HIERARCHICAL PROCESS (AHP) ANALYSIS;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 33846694101     PISSN: 08917736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WSC.2005.1574486     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Anthony, N.R., and Govindarajan, G. 1998. Management control systems. Irwin McGraw-Hill
2. Ayers, J. B. 2002. A primer on supply chain management and Supply chain strategies. Making Supply Chain Management Work, Design, Implementation, Partnerships, Technology, and Profits, Ed. Ayers, J. B., Boca Raton, Fla.: CRC Press.
3. Baines, T. S. and Harrison, D. K. 1999. An opportunity for system dynamics in manufacturing system modelling. Production Planning and Control 10(6): 542-552
4. Barton, J.A., Love, D.M., and Taylor, G. D. 2001. Evaluating design implementation strategies using simulation. International Journal of Production Economics, 72(3): 285-299.
5. Bolstroff, P. and Rosenbaum, R. 2003. Supply chain excellence; a handbook for dramatic improvement using the SCOR model. New York AMACOM Books.
6. Forrester, J. 1965. Industrial dynamics. Portland: Productivity Press.
7. Godding, G.W., Sarjoughian, H.S., and Kempf, K.G. 2003. Semiconductor supply network simulation. Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conf, 7-10 Dec 03, New Orleans, LA. Eds. S. Chick, P. J. Sánchez, D. Ferrin, and D. J. Morrice, eds.
8. Gregoriades, A., and Karakostas, B. 2004. Unifying business objects and systems dynamics as a paradigm for developing decision support systems. Decision Support Systems 37(2): 307-311.
9. st System Dynamics Society International Conference, New York, NY, 20-24 July.
10. Hauser, D., and Tadikamalla, P. 1996. The analytic hierarchy process in an uncertain environment: A simulation approach. European Journal of Operational Research 91: 27-37.
11. Huang, S., Sheoran, S, and Keskar, H. 2005. Computer assisted supply chain configuration based on supply chain operations reference (SCOR) model. Computer and Industrial Engineering 48: 377-394.
12. Law, A.M., and Kelton, W.D. 1991. Simulation modelling and analysis. McGraw-Hill.
13. Lee, Y. H., Cho, M. K., Kim, S. J., and Kim, Y. B. 2002. Supply chain simulation with discrete-continuous combined modelling. Computer and Industrial Engineering. 43(1-2): 375-392.
14. Levary, R., Wan, K. 1998. A simulation approach for handling uncertainty in the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 106: 116-122.
15. st System Dynamics Society International Conference. New York, NY, 20-24 July.
16. Lyneis, J.M. 1980. Corporate planning and policy design: A system dynamic approach. The MIT Press
17. Mentzer, J.T. 2004. Fundamentals of supply chain management: twelve drivers of competitive advantage. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
18. Murman, E. 2002. Lean enterprise value: insights from MIT's lean aerospace initiative, New York: Palgrave.
19. Nix, N. W. 2001. The consequences of supply chain management: creating value, satisfaction, and differential advantage. Ed. J. Mentzer, Supply Chain Management, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
20. O'Reilly, J., and Lilegdon, W. R. 1999. Introduction to FACTOR/AIM. Proceedings of the 1999 Winter Simulation Conference, Piscataway, NJ, Eds. P. A. Farrington, H. B. Nembhard, D. Sturrock and G.W. Evans.
21. Poirier, C. and Quinn, F. 2004. How are we doing? a survey of supply chain progress. Supply Chain Management Review Nov/Dec.
22. Rabelo, L., Speller, T., Burns, C., and Meade, P. 2004. Analysis of sustaining growth in a corporation. Management of Technology, Ed. Hosni, Y. and Khalil, T., San Diego, CA: Elsevier Ltd.
23. Rabelo, L., Helal, M., Jones, A. Min, J. 2005. Enterprise simulation: a hybrid system approach. Accepted for publication in the International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing.
24. Rosenbloom, E. S. 1996. A probabilistic interpretation of the final rankings in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research 96: 371-378.
25. Saaty, T. L. 1994. Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with analytic hierarchy process. RWS Publications.
26. Saaty T. L., and Vargas, L.G. 1987. Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 32: 27-37.
27. Sterman, J. 2000. Business dynamics: systems thinking and modelling for a complex world. New York: McGraw Hill.
28. Zahir, M. S. 1991. Incorporating the uncertainty of decision judgments in the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 53: 206-216.
29. Zulch, G., Jonsson, U., and Fischer, J. 2002. Hierarchical simulation of complex production systems by coupling of models. International Journal of Production Economics 77(1): 39-51.