The structure and function of research ethics committees in Africa: A case study

PLoS Medicine

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 0026-0031

  Kass, Nancy E ^a   Hyder, Adnan Ali ^a   Ajuwon, Ademola ^b   Appiah Poku, John ^c   Barsdorf, Nicola ^d   Elsayed, Dya Eldin ^e   Mokhachane, Mantoa ^f   Mupenda, Bavon ^g   Ndebele, Paul ^h   Ndossi, Godwin ⁱ   Sikateyo, Bornwell ^j   Tangwa, Godfrey ^k   Tindana, Paulina ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN   (Nigeria)

^c KOMFO ANOKYE TEACHING HOSPITAL   (Ghana)

^d UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU NATAL   (South Africa)

^e ALZAIEM ALAZHARI UNIVERSITY   (Sudan)

^f UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND   (South Africa)

^g Tropical Institute of Community Health and Development in Africa   (Kenya)

^h Medical Research Council of Zimbabwe   (Zimbabwe)

ⁱ Tanzania Food and Nutrition Centre   (Tanzania)

^j University of Yaounde ^*

^k MINISTRY OF HEALTH   (Ghana)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFRICA; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION; ARTICLE; BIOETHICS; HUMAN; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; RESEARCH ETHICS; STANDARD;

AFRICA; BIOETHICS; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; ETHICS, CLINICAL; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMANS;

EID: 33846685968     PISSN: 15491277     EISSN: 15491676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040003     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. World Medical Association (2000) Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Edinburgh: World Medical Association.
2. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (1991) International guidelines for ethical review of epidemiological studies. Geneva: Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences.
3. Indian Council of Medical Research (2000) Ethical guidelines on biomedical research involving human subjects. New Delhi: Indian Council of Medical Research.
4. Thailand Ministry of Public Health Ethics Committee (1995) Rule of the medical council on the observance of medical ethics. Thailand: Ministry of Public Health.
5. National Consensus Conference on Bioethics and Health Research in Uganda (1997) Guidelines for the conduct of health research involving human subjects in Uganda.
6. 45 CFR 46 (1991) Federal policy for the protection of human subjects. Fed Regist 56: 28003-28018.
7. (1996) Final report of advisory committee on human radiation experiments. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Kass N, Dawson L, Loyo-Berrios N (2003) Ethical oversight of developing country research: Results of a survey of US investigators. IRB: Ethics and Human Research 25: 1-10.
9. Goldman J, Katz M (1982) Inconsistency and institutional review boards. JAMA 248: 197-202.
10. Ceci S, Peters D, Plotkin J (1985) Human subjects review, personal values, and the regulation of social science research. Am Psychol 40: 994-1002.
11. Schreier BA, Stadler HA (1992) Perspectives of research participants, psychologist investigators, and institutional review boards. Percept Mot Skills 74: 1067-1072.
12. Silverman H, Hull SC, Sugarman J (2001) Variability among institutional review boards' decisions within the context of a multicenter trial. Crit Care Med 29: 235-241.
13. Stair TO, Reed CR, Radeos MS, Koski G, Camargo CA (2001) Variation in institutional review board responses to a standard protocol for a multicenter clinical trial. Acad Emerg Med 8: 636-641.
14. Hirshon JM, Krugman SD, Witting MD, Furuno JP, Limcangco MR, et al. (2002) Variability in institutional review board assessment of minimal-risk research. Acad Emerg Med 9: 1417-1420.
15. McWilliams R, Hoover-Fong J, Hamosh A, Beck S, Beaty T (2003) Problematic variation in local institutional review of a multicenter genetic epidemiology study. JAMA 290: 360-366.
16. While AE (1996) Research ethics committees at work: The experience of one multi-location study. J Med Ethics 22: 352-355.
17. Redshaw ME, Harris A, Baum JD (2004) Research ethics committee audit: Differences between committees. J Med Ethics 22: 78-82.
18. Ahmed AH, Nicholson KG (1996) Delays and diversity in the practice of local research ethics committees. J Med Ethics 22: 263-266.
19. Cohen JM, Hedberg WB (1980) The annual activity of a university IRB. IRB 2: 5-6.
20. US Department of Health and Human Resources/Office of the Inspector General (1998) Institutional review boards: A system in jeopardy. Overview and recommendations.
21. National Bioethics Advisory Commission (2001) Ethical and policy issues in research involving human participants. Available: http://www.georgetown.edu/ research/nrcbl/nbac/human/oversumm.html. Accessed 19 December 2006.
22. Institute of Medicine (2002) Responsible research: A systems approach to protecting research participants. Washington (D. C.): National Academy Press.
23. Mfutso-Bengo J, Taylor H (2002) Ethical jurisdictions in biomedical research. Trends Parasitol 18: 231.
24. Love RR, Fost N (2003) A pilot seminar on ethical issues in clinical trials for cancer researchers in Vietnam. IRB 25: 8-10.
25. Hyder A, Wali S, Khan A, Teoh N, Kass N, et al. (2004) Ethical review of health research: a perspective from developing country researchers. J Med Ethics 30: 68-72.
26. Arda B (2000) Evaluation of research ethics committees in Turkey. J Med Ethics 26: 459-461.
27. Macpherson CC (2001) Ethics committees, research ethics: Beyond the guidelines. Developing World Bioeth 1: 57-68.
28. Elsayed DE (2004) The current situation of health research and ethics in Sudan. Developing World Bioeth 4: 154-159.
29. Rivera R, Ezcurra E (2001) Composition and operation of selected research ethics review committees in Latin America. IRB 23: 9-12.
30. Coker R, McKee M (2001) Ethical approval for health research in central and eastern Europe: An international survey. Clinical Medicine 1: 197-199.
31. WHO South East Asian Regional Office (2002) Ethics in health research. New Delhi: World Health Organization.
32. Kirigia JM, Wambebe C, Baba-Mousa A (2005) Status of national research bioethics committees in the WHO African region. BMC Medical Ethics 6.
33. Fogarty International Center (2005) International Bioethics Education and Career Development Award. Available: http://www.fic.nih.gov/programs/ training_grants/bioethics/index.htm. Accessed 19 December 2006.
34. US Department of Health and Human Resources (2006) Office for Human Research Protections. Available: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp. Accessed 19 December 2006.
35. Bell H, Whiton J, Connelly S (1998) Evaluation of NIH implementation of Section 491 of the Public Health Service Act, Mandating Program of Protection for Research Subjects.
36. Hayes GJ, Hayes SC, Dykstra T (1995) A survey of university Institutional Review Boards: Characteristics, policies, and procedures. IRB 17: 1-6.
37. US Department of Health and Human Resources/Office of the Inspector General (1998) Institutional review boards: A time for reform.
38. US Department of Health and Human Resources/Office of the Inspector General (2000) Protecting human research subjects: Status of recommendations.
39. Bliwise R (1999) Managing a medical makeover. Duke Magazine 85.
40. DeVries RG, Forsberg CP (2002) What do IRBs look like? What kind of support do they receive? Account Res 9: 199-216.
41. Kilama WL (2003) Equipping Africa's researchers for global collaboration. Science and Development Network.
42. Forum for African Medical Editors (2004) FAME editorial guidelines. Available: http://www.who.int/tdr/networking/fame/fame_guidelines.htm. Accessed 19 December 2006.
43. Central African Journal of Medicine (2006) Author guidelines. Available: http://www.ajol.info/submissions.php?jid=52. Accessed 19 December 2006.
44. World Health Organization (2000) Operational Guidelines for ethical committees that review biomedical research. Geneva: World Health Organization.
45. Chima S (2006) Regulation of biomedical research in Africa. BMJ 332: 848-851.
46. Ofori-Anyinam O (2001) Composition and responsibilities of ethics committees and investigators. Acta Trop 78 (Suppl): S45-S49.
47. Milford C, Wassenaar D, Slack C (2006) Resources and needs of research ethics committees in Africa: Preparations for HIV vaccine trials. IRB 28: 1-9.
48. Love RR, Fost NC (1997) Ethical and regulatory challenges in a randomized control trial of adjuvant treatment for breast cancer in Vietnam. J Investig Med 45: 423-431.
49. Weijer C, Shapiro S, Fuks A, Glass KC, Skrutkowska M (1995) Monitoring clinical research: An obligation unfulfilled. CMAJ 152: 1973-1980.