Effects of elasticity on the Rayleigh-Taylor instability: Implications for large-scale geodynamics

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 168, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 843-862

  Kaus, Boris J P ^a   Becker, Thorsten W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Elasticity; Gravitational instability; Lithospheric dynamics; Mantle lithosphere; Rayleigh Taylor instability

Indexed keywords

GEODYNAMICS; LITHOSPHERIC STRUCTURE; MANTLE; NUMERICAL MODEL; VISCOELASTICITY;

EID: 33846677180     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: 1365246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03201.x     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Bassi, G. & Bonnin, J., 1988. Rheological modeling and deformation instability of lithosphere under extension, Geophys. J., 93, 485-504.
2. Batt, G.E. & Braun, J., 1997. On the thermomechanical evolution of compressional orogens, Geophys. J. Int., 128, 364-382.
3. Bercovici, D., Dick, H. & Wagner, T., 1992. Nonlinear viscoelasticity and the formation of transverse ridges, J. geophys. Res., 97, 14195-14206.
4. Billen, M.I. & Houseman, G., 2004. Lithospheric instability in obliquely convergent margins: San Gabriel Mountains, Southern California, J. geophys. Res., 109, doi:.
5. Biot, M., 1965. Mechanics of Incremental Deformations, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
6. Biot, M. & Odé, H., 1965. Theory of gravity instability with variable overburden and compaction, Geophysics, 30, 153-166.
7. Braun, J. & Sambridge, M., 1994. Dynamic Lagrangian Remeshing (DLR): a new algorithm for solving large strain deformation problems and its application to fault-propagation folding, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 124, 211-220.
8. Buiter, S.J.H., Babeyko, A., Ellis, S., Gerya, T., Kaus, B., Kellner, A., Schreurs, G. & Yamada, Y., 2006. The numerical sandbox: comparison of model results for a shortening and an extension experiment., in Analogue and Numerical Modelling of Crustal-Scale Processes, Vol. 253, pp. 29-64, eds Buiter, S.J.H. & Schreurs, G., of Geological Society of London Special Publications, Geological Society of London.
9. Burg, J.P. & Podladchikov, Y., 1999. Lithospheric scale folding: numerical modeling and application to the himalayan syntaxes, Int. J. Earth Sc., 88 (2), 190-200.
10. Burg, J.P., Kaus, B. & Podladchikov, Y., 2004. Dome structures in collision orogens. Mechanical investigation of the gravity/compression interplay, in Gneiss Domes in Orogeny, Vol. 380, pp. 47-66, eds Whitney, D., Teyssier, C. & Siddoway, C., Geological Society of America, Boulder.
11. Burov, E. & Guillou-Frottier, L., 2005. The plume head-continental lithosphere interaction using a tectonically realistic formulation for the lithosphere, Geophys. J. Int., pp. doi:.
12. Conrad, C. & Molnar, P., 1997. The growth of Rayleigh-Taylor-type instabilities in the lithosphere for various rheological and density structures, Geophys. J. Int., 129, 95-112.
13. Cuvelier, C., Segal, A. & van Steenhoven, A., 1986. Finite Element Methods and Navier-Stokes Equations, Mathematics and its Applications, Reidel Publishing company, Dordrecht.
14. Dziewonski, A. & Anderson, D.L., 1981. Preliminary reference Earth model, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 25, 297-356.
15. Fletcher, R.C., 1972. Application of a mathematical-model to emplacement of mantled gneiss domes, American Journal of Science, 272 (3), 197-216.
16. Fletcher, R.C. & Hallet, B., 1983. Unstable extension of the lithosphere: A mechanical model for basin-and-range structure, J. geophys. Res., 88 (B9), 7457-7466.
17. Frederiksen, S. & Braun, J., 2001. Numerical modeling of strain localisation during extension of the continental lithosphere, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 188, 241-251.
18. Funiciello, F., Morra, G., Regenauer-Lieb, K. & Giardini, D., 2003. Dynamics of retreating slabs (part 1): Insights from 2-D numerical experiments, J. geophys. Res., 108 (B4), 2206, doi:.
19. Gerbault, M., 2000. At what stress level is the Central Indian Ocean lithosphere buckling?, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 178 (1-2), 165-181.
20. Gurnis, M., Eloy, C. & Zhong, S., 1996. Free-surface formulation of mantle convection - ii. Implications for subduction zone observables, Geophys. J. Int., 127, 719-727.
21. Hall, C.E. & Gurnis, M., 2005. Strength of fracture zones from their barythmetic and gravitational evolution, J. geophys. Res., 110 (B01402), doi:.
22. Hall, C.E., Gurnis, M., Sdrolias, M., Lavier, L. & Dietmar Mueller, R., 2003. Catastrophic initiation of subduction following forced convergence across fracture zones, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 212, 15-30.
23. Harder, H., 1991. Numerical simulation of thermal convection with Maxwellian viscoelasticity, Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 39, 67-88.
24. Hoogenboom, T. & Houseman, G., 2006. Rayleigh-Taylor instability as a mechanism for corona formation on Venus, Icarus, 180, 292-307.
25. Ivins, E.R., Unti, T. & Phillips, R., 1982. Large Prandtl number finite-amplitude thermal-convection with Maxwell viscoelasticity, Geoph. Astroph. Fluid Dyn., 22 (1-2), 103-132.
26. Jackson, J., 2002. Strength of the continental lithosphere: Time to abandon the jelly sandwich?, GSA Today, September, 4-10.
27. Jones, C.H., Farmer, G.L. & Unruh, J.R., 2004. Tectonics of Pliocene removal of lithosphere of the Sierra Nevada, California, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 116, 1408-1422.
28. Kaus, B., 2005. Modelling approaches to geodynamic processes, Phd-Thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, (http://geodynamics.usc.edu/~bkaus/PhD\_Kaus\_Doublesided.pdf.
29. Kaus, B. & Schmalholz, S.M., 2006. 3D Finite amplitude folding: implications for stress evolution during crustal and lithospheric deformation., Geophys. Res. Lett., 33 (L14309), doi:.
30. Kaus, B., Podladchikov, Y. & Schmid, D.W., 2004. Eulerian spectral/ finite difference method for large deformation modelling of visco-elasto-plastic geomaterials, Bolletino Geofisico, 45, 346-349.
31. Kaus, B.J.P. & Podladchikov, Y., 2006. Initiation of localized shear zones in viscoelastoplastic rocks., J. geophys. Res., 111 (B04412), doi:.
32. Kohler, M., 1999. Lithospheric deformation beneath the San Gabriel Mountains in the southern California Transverse Ranges, J. geophys. Res., 104, 15025-15041.
33. Kohler, M. & Eberhart-Philips, D., 2002. Three-dimensional lithospheric structure below the New Zealand Southern Alps, J. geophys. Res., 107, 2225, doi:.
34. Lee, C.-T., Yin, Q.-Z., Rudnick, R., Chesley, J. & Jacobsen, S., 2000. Osmium isotope evidence for Mesozoic removal of the lithospheric mantle beneath the Sierra Nevada, California, Science, 289, 1912-1916.
35. Mancktelow, N.S., 2001. Single-layer folds developed from initial random perturbations: The effects of probability distribution, fractal dimension, phase, and amplitude, in Tectonic Modeling: A Volume in Honor of Hans Ramberg, Vol. 193, pp. 69-87, eds Koyi, H. & Mancktelow, N.S., Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO.
36. Melosh, H.J., 1978. Dynamic support of the outer rise, Geophys. Res. Lett., 5, 321-324.
37. Molnar, P. & Houseman, G., 2004. The effects of buoyant crust on the gravitational instability of thickened mantle lithosphere at zones of intracontinental convergence, Geophys. J. Int., 158, 1134-1150, doi:.
38. Molnar, P. & Jones, C., 2004. A test of laboratory based rheological parameters of olivine from an analysis of late Cenozoic convective removal of mantle lithosphere beneath the Sierra Nevada, California, USA, Geophys. J. Int., 2004 (156), 555-564, doi:.
39. Moresi, L., Dufour, F. & Muehlaus, H.B., 2002. Mantle convection modeling with viscoelastic/brittle lithosphere: Numerical modeling and plate tectonic modeling, Pure appl. Geophys., 159, 2335-2356.
40. Moresi, L., Dufour, F. & Muhlhaus, H.-B., 2003. A Lagrangian integration point finite element method for large deformation modeling of viscoelastic geomaterials, Journal of Computational Physics, 184, 476-497.
41. Mühlhaus, H.B. & Regenauer-Lieb, K., 2005. A self-consistent plate mantle model that includes elasticity: Computational aspects and application to basic modes of comvection, Geophys. J. Int., doi:.
42. Naimark, B.M. & Ismail-Zadeh, A., 1994. Gravitational instability of Maxwell upper mantle, Comput. Seis. Geodyn., 1, 36-42.
43. Neil, E. & Houseman, G., 1999. Rayleigh-Taylor instability of the upper mantle and its role in intraplate orogeny, Geophys. J. Int., 138, 89-107.
44. Odé, H., 1966. Gravitational instability of a multilayered system of high viscosity, Verhandelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Afd. Natuurkunde., 1 (24), 96.
45. Ogawa, M., 1987. Shear instability in a viscoelastic material as the cause of deep focus earthquakes, J. geophys. Res., 92 (B1), 13801-13810.
46. Peltier, W.R., 1985. Mantle convection and viscoelasticity, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 17, 561-608.
47. Podladchikov, Y., Lenardic, A., Yuen, D. & Quareni, F., 1993. Dynamical consequences of stress focussing for different rheologies: Earth and Venus perspectives, EOS, Trans. Am. geophys. Un., 74 (43), 566.
48. Poliakov, A. & Podladchikov, Y., 1992. Diapirism and topography, Geophys. J. Int., 109, 553-564.
49. Poliakov, A., Cundall, P., Podladchkov, Y. & Lyakhovsky, V., 1993. An explicit inertial method for the simulation of viscoelastic flow: An evaluation of elastic effects on diapiric flow in two- and three-layers models, in Flow and Creep in the Solar System: Observations, modeling and Theory, pp. 175-195, eds Stone, D. & Runcorn, S., Proceeding of NATO Advanced Study. Institute.
50. Ranalli, G., 1995. Rheology of the Earth, 2nd edn, Chapman and Hall, London.
51. Regenauer-Lieb, K., Yuen, D. & Branlund, J., 2001. The initation of subduction: Criticality by addition of water?, Science, 294, 578-580.
52. Regenauer-Lieb, K., Weinberg, R.F. & Rosenbaum, G., 2006. The effect of energy feedbacks on continental strength, Nature, 442, doi:.
53. Ricard, Y. & Froidevaux, C., 1986. Stretching instabilities and lithospheric boudinage, J. geophys. Res., 91 (B8), 8314-8324.
54. Schmalholz, S.M. & Podladchikov, Y., 1999. Buckling versus folding: importance of viscoelasticity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26 (17), 2641-2644.
55. Schmalholz, S.M. & Podladchikov, Y.Y., 2001. Viscoelastic folding: Maxwell versus kelvin rheology, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28 (9), 1835-1838.
56. Schmalholz, S.M., Podladchikov, Y.Y. & Schmid, D.W., 2001. A spectral/finite difference method for simulating large deformations of heterogeneous, viscoelastic materials, Geophys. J. Int., 145 (1), 199-208.
57. Schmalholz, S.M., Podladchikov, Y. & Burg, J.P., 2002. Control of folding by gravity and matrix thickness: Implications for large-scale folding, J. geophys. Res., 107, doi:.
58. Schmalholz, S.M., Podladchikov, Y. & Jamtveit, B., 2005. Structural softening of the lithosphere, TerraNova, 17, 66-72, doi:.
59. Schubert, G., Olson, P. & Turcotte, D.L., 2001. Mantle convection in the Earth and planets, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
60. Stern, T., Molnar, P., Okaya, D. & Eberhart-Philips, D., 2000. Teleseismic P wave delays and modes of shortening the mantle lithosphere beneath South Island, New Zealand, J. geophys. Res., 105, 21615-21632.
61. Toth, G. & Gurnis, M., 1998. Dynamics of subduction initiation at preexisting fault zones, J. geophys. Res., 103, 18053-18067.
62. Toussaint, G., Burov, E. & Jolivet, L., 2004. Continental plate collision: Unstable vs. stable slab dynamics, Geology, 32 (1), 33-36.
63. Vasilyev, O.V., Podladchikov, Y.Y. & Yuen, D.A., 2001. Modeling of plume-lithosphere interaction using adaptive multilevel wavelet collocation algorithm., Geophys. J. Int., 147 (3), 579-589.
64. Zandt, G., Gilbert, H., Owens, T., Ducea, M., Saleeby, J. & Jones, C.H., 2004. Active foundering of a continental arc root beneath the southern Sierra Nevada, California, Nature, 431, 41-46.
65. Zuber, M.T., Parmentier, E.M. & Fletcher, R.C., 1986. Extension of the continental lithosphere: A model for two scales of Basin and Range deformation, J. geophys. Res., 91 (B5), 4826-4838.